The 1932 Journalism Textbook That Accidentally Describes the AI Newsroom of the Future
A forgotten reporting manual shows how artificial intelligence could rebuild the political beat system American newspapers once relied on.
In 1932, Curtis MacDougall outlined the duties of political reporters: monitor government agencies, track elections, follow legislation and understand political machines.
Those are exactly the kinds of information problems AI is good at solving.
codymcdevitt.substack.com/p/the-1932-j...
07.03.2026 16:32
👍 0
🔁 1
💬 0
📌 0
What Were Abortions Like Before Roe v. Wade? Inside America’s Underground Abortion System
Police raids, secret referral networks, and activists exposing the underground abortion system that existed in America before 1973.
Before Roe v. Wade, abortion didn’t disappear — it went underground.
Police raided apartments turned into makeshift clinics. Doctors quietly treated complications. Activists exposed a hidden referral network helping women find illegal procedures.
New story:
reprorights.substack.com/p/what-were-...
07.03.2026 16:10
👍 5
🔁 2
💬 0
📌 0
Why Hollywood Can’t Create Movie Stars Anymore
The collapse of the star system, the rise of franchises, and how the next generation of global stars may emerge from theater.
I've heard from younger people that they're the first generation without pop culture figures. So I developed ideas for people in power to implement if they wanted to create bankable stars, as they did during the golden era.
codymcdevitt.substack.com/p/why-hollyw...
07.03.2026 08:02
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Rex v Bourne (1938): The Abortion Trial That Changed British Law
How a 14-year-old rape victim, a defiant surgeon, and a single word in an 1861 statute reshaped UK abortion law decades before the 1967 Abortion Act.
In 1938, a London surgeon performed an abortion on a 14-year-old rape victim — then told the police:
“I want you to arrest me.”
The trial that followed, Rex v Bourne, quietly reshaped British abortion law decades before legalization.
reprorights.substack.com/p/rex-v-bour...
06.03.2026 22:34
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
It was very crime noir. If you like graphic novels that sort of fall into this, read Ed Brubaker's The Fade Out and any of his other comic work. I'm actually a comic book nerd.
05.03.2026 19:49
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
I tried for years to get City Paper and In Pittsburgh Newsweekly added to newspapers.com. It's now owned by Block Communications, which is closing all operations in Pittsburgh. So alas, it probably won't happen. No one takes historical preservation seriously.
05.03.2026 19:48
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
The “Abortion Racket”: A 1935 Investigation Into Illegal Abortions in New York
A forgotten article in The Forum exposed underground abortion networks, corrupt police raids, and the dangers women faced decades before Roe v. Wade.
While researching abortion history, I tracked down a forgotten 1935 investigation called “The Abortion Racket.”
It described a hidden world of doctors, midwives, police raids and corruption surrounding illegal abortion in New York decades before Roe v. Wade.
reprorights.substack.com/p/the-aborti...
03.03.2026 20:51
👍 2
🔁 1
💬 0
📌 0
Well guys, the final proofread is done. It’s gotta be laid out, but I hope to have it up for pre-order by the beginning of next week. The release date is March 28.
03.03.2026 01:37
👍 0
🔁 1
💬 0
📌 0
This could start a regional war in the Middle East and American military don’t have enough volunteers. America won’t stand for a draft.
01.03.2026 03:55
👍 2
🔁 1
💬 0
📌 0
Trump has usurped congress’s powers of war
01.03.2026 03:54
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
I’m gonna be frank with the men of Hollywood. I expect some level of fortitude in standing up for a great actress and woman like Susan Sarandon. That would be a profile in courage because you could suffer consequences and a loss of luxury to stand for principle. Not seeing that.
01.03.2026 01:07
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Who Decides When America Goes to War? The Iran Crisis and Congressional Authority
As tensions rise with Iran, the Constitution — not political urgency — must determine whether U.S. troops are sent into another Middle East war.
Before the U.S. escalates with Iran, we must insist that Congress authorizes action, not the President acting alone. Our Constitution and our national interest deserve clarity, debate, and accountability — not drift into war shaped by foreign strategy.
codymcdevitt.substack.com/p/who-decide...
01.03.2026 00:39
👍 2
🔁 1
💬 0
📌 0
Boxing three days a week helps with ski conditioning. But there isn’t any workout that can prevent you from wearing out on the third day of skiing the Rockies unless you ski a hundred days a year.
26.02.2026 22:53
👍 0
🔁 2
💬 0
📌 0
That’s a fucking workout
26.02.2026 19:31
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Why Juries Rarely Convicted Abortion Providers Before Roe v. Wade
Even when abortion was a felony in nearly every state, prosecutors struggled to persuade ordinary citizens to punish it as murder.
Before Roe v. Wade, abortion was illegal in nearly every state.
But juries often refused to convict.
Why? Because the law said “felony,” and ordinary citizens weren’t always willing to treat it as such.
New column 👇
reprorights.substack.com/p/why-juries...
26.02.2026 09:19
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
I'm not gonna lie. Every time people say they don't care what a celebrity thinks politically, I ask myself, then how the hell did Donald Trump end up president?
17.02.2026 23:10
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
It’s got one more proofread and waiting on an index, then it’ll be up for pre-order. Aiming for a late March release.
10.02.2026 03:43
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
When people ask me about white supremacy, I’m responding by what I’ve studied and heard from scholars like James Aho. So it’s not a thought experiment. It’s what I took away from experts.
10.02.2026 02:52
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
I’m happy to talk about the Rosedale Banishment with anyone who cares to talk about it. I just don’t want to be used as an example on a two-hour talk show no one listens to so he can demonstrate a convoluted understanding of racism in which every form of it is interchangeable with white supremacy.
09.02.2026 04:47
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Even within your own party and movements, you'll do things that evoke hatred and strong reactions. There's no way to publicly defend Margaret Sanger without triggering a backlash. Should you do it? Yes. But people will then cast you as a racist or as defending a genocide. It's just part of it.
07.02.2026 07:18
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Right at a time in history when we need good men and women to step forward and lead, we’re creating a pallor and shame to public office by casting a former president and his wife, who is also historically important, in a false and defamatory light. These sex scandals just worsen our candidates.
07.02.2026 06:58
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0