An ussie with Oscar Kelly. No, it’s not a selfie, there’s more than just me…
This week we have @oscarkelly.bsky.social of @fenicu.bsky.social group visiting my @icreacommunity.bsky.social group at @iqccudg.bsky.social to do some new and exciting work on Mg
#CompChem #ChemSky
20.02.2026 21:06
👍 7
🔁 2
💬 0
📌 0
When we ate whales for breakfast
A reminder that technological developments aren't sufficient to solve environmental problems
Ahead of World Whale Day on 15 February, Chris Baker tells the story of how the invention of kerosene should have stopped whaling – but instead massively expanded its scope.
13.02.2026 12:22
👍 30
🔁 17
💬 1
📌 1
See also teaching. It's important that the student does the work. Outsourcing to an LLM does nothing for learning necessary skills.
And universities having policies to "Ensure students are trained on AI" is complete nonsense. Any graduate can easily use AI.
21.12.2025 18:53
👍 20
🔁 6
💬 1
📌 0
Abstract: Under the banner of progress, products have been uncritically adopted or
even imposed on users — in past centuries with tobacco and combustion engines, and in
the 21st with social media. For these collective blunders, we now regret our involvement or
apathy as scientists, and society struggles to put the genie back in the bottle. Currently, we
are similarly entangled with artificial intelligence (AI) technology. For example, software updates are rolled out seamlessly and non-consensually, Microsoft Office is bundled with chatbots, and we, our students, and our employers have had no say, as it is not
considered a valid position to reject AI technologies in our teaching and research. This
is why in June 2025, we co-authored an Open Letter calling on our employers to reverse
and rethink their stance on uncritically adopting AI technologies. In this position piece,
we expound on why universities must take their role seriously toa) counter the technology
industry’s marketing, hype, and harm; and to b) safeguard higher education, critical
thinking, expertise, academic freedom, and scientific integrity. We include pointers to
relevant work to further inform our colleagues.
Figure 1. A cartoon set theoretic view on various terms (see Table 1) used when discussing the superset AI
(black outline, hatched background): LLMs are in orange; ANNs are in magenta; generative models are
in blue; and finally, chatbots are in green. Where these intersect, the colours reflect that, e.g. generative adversarial network (GAN) and Boltzmann machine (BM) models are in the purple subset because they are
both generative and ANNs. In the case of proprietary closed source models, e.g. OpenAI’s ChatGPT and
Apple’s Siri, we cannot verify their implementation and so academics can only make educated guesses (cf.
Dingemanse 2025). Undefined terms used above: BERT (Devlin et al. 2019); AlexNet (Krizhevsky et al.
2017); A.L.I.C.E. (Wallace 2009); ELIZA (Weizenbaum 1966); Jabberwacky (Twist 2003); linear discriminant analysis (LDA); quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA).
Table 1. Below some of the typical terminological disarray is untangled. Importantly, none of these terms
are orthogonal nor do they exclusively pick out the types of products we may wish to critique or proscribe.
Protecting the Ecosystem of Human Knowledge: Five Principles
Finally! 🤩 Our position piece: Against the Uncritical Adoption of 'AI' Technologies in Academia:
doi.org/10.5281/zeno...
We unpick the tech industry’s marketing, hype, & harm; and we argue for safeguarding higher education, critical
thinking, expertise, academic freedom, & scientific integrity.
1/n
06.09.2025 08:13
👍 3790
🔁 1897
💬 110
📌 390
It seems this can't be emphasized enough. Chatbots and LLMs do not make mistakes (excepting any bugs in the code). They do not lie. They do not blackmail or cheat. They follow statistics. When the people who build these systems don't tell you this, they are either deluded or trying to mislead.
06.11.2025 11:33
👍 109
🔁 30
💬 8
📌 3
Delighted to finally share this work in @jacs.acspublications.org . Big thanks to @fenicu.bsky.social , @marcelswart.bsky.social and Brendan Twamley. Check it out! 👇🏻🧪 #chemsky
06.08.2025 17:59
👍 9
🔁 2
💬 0
📌 0
Okay so imagine this, you have no opinions, you have no skills, you have no wants or desires, you are a smooth orb of nothing and our subscription service helps make sure you still cast a shadow that resembles a human being. Sounds sick right?
22.04.2025 21:46
👍 7872
🔁 1187
💬 53
📌 38
An excellent CSCB symposium in UCD last week, with @oscarkelly.bsky.social presenting his discoveries in modulating charge at a porphyrin. #chemsky #loveirishresearch
17.12.2024 16:46
👍 7
🔁 1
💬 0
📌 0