David Moorfield Frank's Avatar

David Moorfield Frank

@dmf84

Interdisciplinary environmental philosopher 🌳🌹🌎🌞🦝 Values in/and Environmental Science/Research Ethics, Environmental Utopias, posting nuance, jokes 🫠 for/as myself only

616
Followers
1,534
Following
288
Posts
12.11.2024
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by David Moorfield Frank @dmf84

The current world chicken population is larger than the planet-wide non-chicken bird population not just today, but at any point in the history of earth.

13.03.2026 02:20 πŸ‘ 1423 πŸ” 103 πŸ’¬ 116 πŸ“Œ 39
Preview
Judge Orders Colorado to Stop Throwing Prisoners in Solitary for Refusing to Work Years after voters amended the state’s constitution to ban forced labor in prison, a court ruling could finally make Colorado change how prison guards β€œcompel and coerce” work.

Colorado is the first state where advocates have secured a court ruling forcing prison officials to stop using solitary confinement to compel labor from incarcerated people. β€œIt’s exciting and it’s amazing,” says one advocate in the state.

12.03.2026 18:01 πŸ‘ 286 πŸ” 88 πŸ’¬ 4 πŸ“Œ 10
Poster for this semester's reading group. We meet every first Wednesday at 4:15pm (CET) at Ruhr University Bochum (room NDEF04/346). If you need more information (abstract of the book, topics of the individual dates, information about the moodle course etc.), please e-mail me! vera.straetmanns[at]rub.de

Poster for this semester's reading group. We meet every first Wednesday at 4:15pm (CET) at Ruhr University Bochum (room NDEF04/346). If you need more information (abstract of the book, topics of the individual dates, information about the moodle course etc.), please e-mail me! vera.straetmanns[at]rub.de

This semester, we will be reading selected chapters from "Everything flows", edited by @djnicholson.bsky.social and John DuprΓ© in our Reading Group. All interested are welcome to join us at @ruhr-uni-bochum.de (room NDEF04/346). If needed, we can also arrange hybrid meetings.
#HPBio #PhDSky

12.03.2026 14:31 πŸ‘ 34 πŸ” 10 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 1

The climate impacts of fossil fuel COβ‚‚ will last longer than nuclear waste.

12.03.2026 20:17 πŸ‘ 119 πŸ” 23 πŸ’¬ 5 πŸ“Œ 3

It's also hard to choose the pedestrian/bicycle/public transit/density option when you may not have experienced it, it may not be available to you, it's often maligned and disparaged, and it's largely only achieved through collective effort rather than individual choice.

12.03.2026 17:22 πŸ‘ 179 πŸ” 13 πŸ’¬ 6 πŸ“Œ 1
Fitzcarraldo

Fitzcarraldo

Can this be a solution?

12.03.2026 13:52 πŸ‘ 1544 πŸ” 303 πŸ’¬ 32 πŸ“Œ 23

rebecca solnit today rebecca solnit tomorrow rebecca solnit forever

11.03.2026 17:27 πŸ‘ 362 πŸ” 27 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0

<Back> to Return
Previous  Next  Send    Actions    Translate                                                       News: News Story
101)	 	 	*PENTAGON OFFICIALS MET WITH LAWMAKERS ON IRAN ON TUESDAY: NYT	 	BFW	16:35	 	 
102)	 	 	*NYT CITES 3 PEOPLE FAMILIAR WITH CONGRESSIONAL BRIEFING ON IRAN	 	BFW	16:33	 	 
103)	 	 	*PENTAGON SAYS IRAN WAR COST MORE THAN $11B IN FIRST WEEK: NYT	 	BFW	16:33	 	 
 03/11/2026 16:31:40[NYT]Β 
Billion
 By Catie Edmondson

 (New York Times) -- In a Capitol Hill briefing, officials gave their most
 comprehensive assessment of the cost of the first six days of the war, but the
 number omitted several aspects of the operation.
 Pentagon officials told lawmakers in a closed-door briefing on Capitol Hill on
 Tuesday that they estimated the cost of the war against Iran had exceeded
 $11.3 billion in the first six days alone, according to three people familiar with
 the briefing.
 The estimate did not include many of the costs associated with the operation,
 such as the buildup of military hardware and personnel ahead of the first
 strikes. For that reason, lawmakers expect the number to grow considerably as
 the Pentagon continues to calculate the costs that accumulated just in the first
 week.
 Still, it appeared to be the most comprehensive assessment Congress had
 received so far amid mounting questions about the objectives, scope and time
 frame for the war. The New York Times and The Washington Post reported
 earlier that defense officials had said in recent congressional briefings that the
 military used up $5.6 billion of munitions in the first two days of the war.
 That is a far larger amount and munitions burn rate than had been publicly
 disclosed. The Center for Strategic and International Studies had estimated that
 the first 100 hours of the operation cost $3.7 billion, or $891.4 million each
 day.
 The first wave of the bombardment used weapons including the AGM-154 glide
 bomb, which can cost from $578,000 to $836,000. The Navy …

<Back> to Return Previous Next Send Actions Translate News: News Story 101) *PENTAGON OFFICIALS MET WITH LAWMAKERS ON IRAN ON TUESDAY: NYT BFW 16:35 102) *NYT CITES 3 PEOPLE FAMILIAR WITH CONGRESSIONAL BRIEFING ON IRAN BFW 16:33 103) *PENTAGON SAYS IRAN WAR COST MORE THAN $11B IN FIRST WEEK: NYT BFW 16:33 03/11/2026 16:31:40[NYT]Β  Billion By Catie Edmondson (New York Times) -- In a Capitol Hill briefing, officials gave their most comprehensive assessment of the cost of the first six days of the war, but the number omitted several aspects of the operation. Pentagon officials told lawmakers in a closed-door briefing on Capitol Hill on Tuesday that they estimated the cost of the war against Iran had exceeded $11.3 billion in the first six days alone, according to three people familiar with the briefing. The estimate did not include many of the costs associated with the operation, such as the buildup of military hardware and personnel ahead of the first strikes. For that reason, lawmakers expect the number to grow considerably as the Pentagon continues to calculate the costs that accumulated just in the first week. Still, it appeared to be the most comprehensive assessment Congress had received so far amid mounting questions about the objectives, scope and time frame for the war. The New York Times and The Washington Post reported earlier that defense officials had said in recent congressional briefings that the military used up $5.6 billion of munitions in the first two days of the war. That is a far larger amount and munitions burn rate than had been publicly disclosed. The Center for Strategic and International Studies had estimated that the first 100 hours of the operation cost $3.7 billion, or $891.4 million each day. The first wave of the bombardment used weapons including the AGM-154 glide bomb, which can cost from $578,000 to $836,000. The Navy …

$2bn/day, with $2.8bn/day in munitions alone over the first two days. I tend to think of myself as a Large Number Scale Understander but this is just mind-boggling amounts of money.

11.03.2026 20:50 πŸ‘ 1105 πŸ” 301 πŸ’¬ 25 πŸ“Œ 68
Post image

It would be nice if people remembered this piece of wisdom from the greatest economics tweet in history (and the one I am most insanely jealous of not having written, especially because it was a reply to me).

11.03.2026 23:21 πŸ‘ 967 πŸ” 240 πŸ’¬ 10 πŸ“Œ 2
Post image

One thing I've been stressing is that, if Hormuz traffic remained stopped, the monumental oil supply shock will manifest as sharp price spikes in wealthy nations that sap disposable incomes

In poorer countries, the shock will manifest as outright physical shortages.

11.03.2026 02:59 πŸ‘ 678 πŸ” 178 πŸ’¬ 12 πŸ“Œ 23
Video thumbnail

WATCH β€” @jamestalarico.bsky.social : β€œEvery dollar we spend bombing people in the Middle East is one we’re not spending here at home. We’re always told we don’t have enough money for schools or healthcare or for veterans, but there’s always enough to bomb people on the other side of the world.”

10.03.2026 22:39 πŸ‘ 10095 πŸ” 3230 πŸ’¬ 253 πŸ“Œ 146

I don't want to do a whole long rant on this, so I'll just say: the reason fossil fuels & other aligned incumbents don't want to transition to clean energy is that it will *damage their material interests*. And folks, they understand their own material interests. Really well!

10.03.2026 18:36 πŸ‘ 675 πŸ” 136 πŸ’¬ 10 πŸ“Œ 11

How to Talk About Climate Change When You’d Rather Talk About Something Else

10.03.2026 18:32 πŸ‘ 17 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

I don’t think people who aren’t regularly covering the reproductive rights beat realize how common it is for women to be incarcerated for miscarriages.

10.03.2026 16:35 πŸ‘ 720 πŸ” 309 πŸ’¬ 8 πŸ“Œ 0

That's cool, if I even mention the existence of trans people in class a student can anonymously report me and I can get fired, but I bet it sucks to not be able to talk about AI with sufficient enthusiasm too

10.03.2026 12:57 πŸ‘ 36 πŸ” 8 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

I am delighted that dogs are able to receive high-quality health care.

But what about humans?

In America today, 85 million are uninsured or under-insured.

Health care must be considered a human right.

We need Medicare for All, NOW.

09.03.2026 18:18 πŸ‘ 1194 πŸ” 183 πŸ’¬ 43 πŸ“Œ 12
Pernicious diversity, neutrality, and right values - PhilSci-Archive

Why are we justified marginalizing Nazis and other racist and sexist scientists?

(tl,dr: it's a paper thread: philsci-archive.pitt.edu/28499/) #philsci #sts #philsky

09.03.2026 15:24 πŸ‘ 13 πŸ” 4 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 2

can't help but notice whose losses are expressed in dollars and whose losses are expressed in lives

09.03.2026 11:51 πŸ‘ 2172 πŸ” 523 πŸ’¬ 7 πŸ“Œ 6

Farming fed less than 2 billion people in 1900 and 76 million Americans. It feeds more than 8 billion people today and about 350 million Americans.

In the US, people spend about 10% of their incomes on food now, vs more than 40% of their incomes in 1901.

Seems better now πŸ‘πŸΌ

08.03.2026 21:29 πŸ‘ 136 πŸ” 24 πŸ’¬ 8 πŸ“Œ 1
Preview
Sea Levels Are Already Higher Than Many Scientists Think, New Study Shows

"Coastal sea levels are, on average, eight inches to a foot higher than many maps and models of the world’s coastlines indicate" www.nytimes.com/2026/03/04/c...

08.03.2026 21:02 πŸ‘ 4 πŸ” 2 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 1

This is what ecocide looks like.

08.03.2026 17:41 πŸ‘ 5072 πŸ” 1849 πŸ’¬ 91 πŸ“Œ 43

Iran’s people were facing a horrible shortage of water before the war began. If we are destroying desalination plants and setting fire to Teheran we are committing unfathomable crimes.

08.03.2026 02:19 πŸ‘ 25322 πŸ” 8112 πŸ’¬ 781 πŸ“Œ 327
Preview
AI and Ethics AIΒ and Ethics seeks to promote informed debate and discussion of the ethical, regulatory, and policy implications that arise from the development of AI. It ...

πŸ‘€

CfP: Topical Collection on AI Resistance, Refusal, Reclamation and Reimagining: Ethical Imperatives and Emerging Practices

08.03.2026 02:03 πŸ‘ 6 πŸ” 3 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

β€œIf the word hope doesn't work for you try, 'Never fucking surrender’” - @rebeccasolnit.bsky.social

08.03.2026 01:44 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

I’m at a philosophy conference and it is WILD. You philosophers are fascinating people.

07.03.2026 15:08 πŸ‘ 76 πŸ” 11 πŸ’¬ 5 πŸ“Œ 7

What rough beast is it, you ask? It’s not my job to educate you.

07.03.2026 15:05 πŸ‘ 76 πŸ” 6 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 2

it’s certainly not the chief issue here, but the iran war should accelerate renewables buildouts around the world so we don’t need to be so dependent on volatile oil and gas imports

06.03.2026 21:51 πŸ‘ 202 πŸ” 37 πŸ’¬ 10 πŸ“Œ 6

circling back on this, they did it

06.03.2026 20:14 πŸ‘ 220 πŸ” 63 πŸ’¬ 8 πŸ“Œ 0

could be a nothing burger...but it could also be an everything bagel

05.03.2026 18:48 πŸ‘ 1592 πŸ” 373 πŸ’¬ 44 πŸ“Œ 9

Women: We live in a constant state of vigilance because men pose a constant threat to us, here are literally millions of corroborating stories.

Men: What a scary time for men this is.

05.03.2026 15:08 πŸ‘ 3280 πŸ” 679 πŸ’¬ 34 πŸ“Œ 16