Trending
Rachel Cunningham's Avatar

Rachel Cunningham

@friendlighost

Have been trying to be cool for my entire life and never succeeded. Maybe this is my year!!

300
Followers
1,212
Following
219
Posts
10.11.2024
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Rachel Cunningham @friendlighost

It turns out killing citizens in the street for 2A rights exercising, on video from multiple angles, and lying about it WAS the line

01.02.2026 20:49 πŸ‘ 6 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

It's not deleted I just looked at it

30.01.2026 20:26 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Earlier this week I thought, clearly they could release the Epstein files unredacted and Trumps base will just ignore whatever is in there.

AND DOJ REALLY DID IT TODAY, GD

30.01.2026 20:25 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

I just read some extremely graphic documents on there that ruined my day, worth looking at the DOJ epstein library...

30.01.2026 20:24 πŸ‘ 5 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

I know people are going to go in dogpiling against this governor but this is huge. He's being ideologically consistent in a way that will appeal to his voters. This is what is needed for change

25.01.2026 19:50 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Agreed. And ykw I'm happy there's some critical thinking like "hey um what's being said and all of the footage does not agree at all."

25.01.2026 04:14 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Hell yeah NRA

25.01.2026 02:55 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

I think it's because it's again, it's extremely clear in the footage he's on the ground and shot in the back after being beaten and maced.

unlike last week's "the car could have killed him"

In this footage it's like so extremely undebatable the officers are not under threat

25.01.2026 02:53 πŸ‘ 19 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

People who sincerely believe in 2A cannot justify this. The footage does not support a hostile, life threatening situation for the gang of officers.

25.01.2026 01:30 πŸ‘ 9 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Politely why do we care about their strongly worded letters? They already voted no in the house, yes?

18.12.2025 00:20 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

What's annoying about this is we already barely triggered it, I think last August? And it feels like nothing happened, perhaps this is slow moving enough that it makes no difference yet again

16.12.2025 20:37 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

*Carrie Bradshaw music*

and at this point, I had to wonder... Did Jerome Powell actually stick the soft-landing?? #econsky

11.12.2025 05:00 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

And 2024 was not exactly a hot year

09.12.2025 20:30 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Holy cow what's the source on this one

09.12.2025 20:28 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Is this a Torsten chart

09.12.2025 20:28 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Wait I'm being so for real I'm not a smart law person, can you explain what they're doing like I'm 5?

27.06.2025 23:01 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

There's something so good about revisiting an album you didn't like when it came out but years later you're like, no this slaps

27.06.2025 00:17 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Lmaooo I hope you're right man

06.06.2025 17:57 πŸ‘ 7 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

As a degrowth girlypop I Stan this message but the President of the United States advocating for less consumption (the basis of our economy) is insane

30.04.2025 19:01 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Unfortunately normalcy bias won this round

30.04.2025 19:00 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Anna Wong: Empty Shelves Are Coming Soon Odd Lots Β· Episode

Empty shelves for Christmas? Interesting ep here. Anna Wong is so objective, I love to hear her takes. #econsky

25.04.2025 17:39 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

I'll admit it– I am always nice to my roomba, just in case.

21.04.2025 01:27 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Carrie Bradshaw at her computer

Carrie Bradshaw at her computer

Once again, I was left to wonder: was Pete Hegseth signal chatting military attack plans to everyone but me??

Am I the one that’s insecure, or is it his communication practices that are insecure?

20.04.2025 21:37 πŸ‘ 13145 πŸ” 1912 πŸ’¬ 160 πŸ“Œ 64

You're correct

14.04.2025 18:40 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

DOJ just basically went back on testimony as well, pivoting to "no actually we do think he was in a gang now, even though we said before that it was an error, under oath."

14.04.2025 18:18 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

If this President can jail American citizens in El Salvador no matter what the courts say, then the next one could override the J6 pardons and Presidential immunity no matter what the courts say.

That's where this leads us. Don't open Pandora's box.

14.04.2025 18:12 πŸ‘ 4 πŸ” 2 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

β€œWE ARE ALL-POWERFUL AND CANNOT BE DEFIED EXCEPT BY THE SCHMUCK WE SUB-CONTRACT TO RUN A JAIL.”

14.04.2025 16:13 πŸ‘ 123 πŸ” 4 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0

More in No, Other People:

New poll:

β€œAmerica would be better off if more people worked in manufacturing.”

β€’ 80% of Americans agree
β€’ 20% disagree

β€œI would be better off if I worked in a factory.”

β€’ 25% of Americans agree
β€’ 73% disagree
β€’ 2% currently work in a factory

13.04.2025 17:06 πŸ‘ 26460 πŸ” 6878 πŸ’¬ 1118 πŸ“Œ 855