Legalized Theft = Disrupt the market + The poor panic + The rich buy it allβon sale.
Legalized Theft = Disrupt the market + The poor panic + The rich buy it allβon sale.
Just remember, narcissists never admit when they are wrong.
There are some, but they are more expensive, and there are studies that have shown diverting money away from dirty companies actually makes them worse.
What I have clients do instead, donate the different in cost of regular fund for the ESG to a local charity that supports green initiatives.
When you jump back in, go with a globally diversified index instead of the S&P.
It will save you from ever doing this again. ;)
Honest question then for you: if you don't want them doing it, why are you?
Not to mention, with an annuity in place, if it covers your baseline retirement needs, you don't need to worry or react as much anyway.
And letβs say you bought the S&P 500 instead of the globally diversified portfolio Iβve already suggested.
For anyone who bought, holds it, and waits for recovery has lost nothing.
You donβt lose unless you sell.
But selling early and buying back in late cost actual return. Thatβs the point.
Cash on hand mean you missed part of the upswing leading up the current drop.
Thatβs not a gain in your favour.
Again, your logic is flawed.
Iβm not saying that all.
Iβm saying humans are horrible at investigating.
Timing the market, picking stocks, have a terribly negative effect on your returns.
Instead, a globally diversified passive equity portfolio will do everything you need without needing to guess and guess wrong.
Everyone said the same thing about Covid, the financial crisis, the dot com bubble, and on and on it goes.
None of it matter for those who stayed invested and did so passively.
Your logic is flawed.
Thatβs the point.
Thereβs no need to do what youβre doing and the nearly four decades of evidence demonstrates youβre the one harming yourself.
You think youβre being effective, and yet youβre costing yourself money long term.
And youβll miss the upswing like everyone who does the same continues to do.
Those who ride out miss nothing.
Itβs the whole point of passive investing for the long term. You donβt need to predict and risk being wrong. Because you, indeed, are wrong, and you just donβt know it.
When saving is the goal, the obstacle between you and saving money is you.
When it's finally time to spend money, the obstacle is still you.
Retirement is a whole new stage of lifeβone the path to retirement doesn't prepare us for.
I'm so pleased Meera Ramen took the time explore the kind of planning available beyond traditional portfolio management.
Thanks to @theglobeandmail.com for sharing.
www.theglobeandmail.com/investing/pe...
Love this!
Such a great conversation, Robb!
Situations like this make me want to scream.
Most advisors donβt have a clue how to produce retirement income.
Itβs why I had to give props to this guy for not trying, even though he could have chosen a better response.
PS β If your advisor hesitates when you mention βusing your retirement assets,β it might be time for a second opinion.
Retirement isnβt just mathβitβs emotion. A great advisor will discuss the fear of outliving your money, the guilt of spending hard-earned savings, and help you spend more while you still can.
Not all advisors deliver the same kind of advice. Ensure yours specializes in your phase of life.
If they can also talk you through the latest developments in retirement income research, you can hit them with a follow-up question.
βHow will you address the psychological challenges of spending my savings?β
βWhatβs your experience with decumulation strategies?β
A strong answer should include the limitations of the "4% rule," why dividends aren't a strategy, and the behavioural pitfalls of systems like Guyton Guardrails.
Retirement income planning demands distinct strategiesβtax efficiency and withdrawal sequencing while managing the risks of longevity and brevity.
Missteps here can cost you the retired life you promised yourself.
If youβre nearing retirement, ask your advisor:
I have to admitβI respect this advisor's self-awareness.
He didnβt pretend to know what he doesnβt.
I've seen this situation many times before.
Advisors who focus on growing wealth often lack the expertise to convert it into income.
Itβs like expecting a family physician to become a brain surgeon overnight: both are doctors, but only one has the specialized skills for the task.
I once spoke with a retiree with $2M in savings. When she asked her advisor, βHow do I start drawing income in retirement?β he replied, βWhy would you take money out?β
He manages her investments but has no plan for her retirement incomeβand worse, refused to help create one.
Before retirees buy a big insurance policy, remember, if you're healthy enough to qualify for insurance, you're healthy enough to use the money instead of leaving more behind.
My latest collaboration with Globe Advisor.
www.theglobeandmail.com/investing/gl...
Haha Iβm almost done writing it. Few more months of deep editing.
You reach a point in life when saving money isn't your problem, it's spending it.
We simply call this stage retirement.
There are many reasons retirees fail to spend.
Don't miss your chance to use your retirement savings while you're still able to do so.
You can say YES to more trips.
You can say YES to giving more to your kids now (when it actually matters)
You can say YES to living more while you still can.
Every excuse preventing you from using your money, I've already solved, behaviourally and financially.