It's-9C where I am. Considering going for an evening stroll before an actual cold front hits us.
22.01.2026 02:10
👍 3
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
It's-9C where I am. Considering going for an evening stroll before an actual cold front hits us.
"Overall, 14 % of toddlers in the pre-pandemic group were at high risk for developmental delays on the BSID-III compared with 51.6 % in the SARS-CoV-2 exposed group." 😭
I love your alt-tags !
En effet, c'est purement électoraliste et on dirait que tout le monde le sait.... mais la CAQ pense encore qu'il reste un peu de jus dans le citron, alors on continue d'en parler et de gaspiller temps et argent sur des études...
It's not that bad - the person was a kid, and was shielded by their parents from the worst, many of the replies explain how things were&many also explain how there's still ongoing damage being done.
Frankly, anything that keeps covid in the headlines is welcome. We just won't address it otherwise.
These people cannot conceive of the whole "answer-shaped responses" thing. They keep asking if the LLM is lying or not, and the answer is "stop asking". It's like DJT - he doesn't lie, because he doesn't understand the concept of truth. It's like asking if a Magic 8 Ball is lying.
Ok, keep on trolling rather than making a point.
And to preempt a cheap comeback: asymptomatic transmission is estimated around 50% of all cases, so if the vaccines eliminated it (which is your claim), it would show.
Because I read about Covid, and have for years? Googling it just now gave me a paper with "Overall, there is no convincing evidence that the COVID-19 vaccination significantly reduces the risk to transmit SARS-CoV-2 to others."
You're claiming vaccinated people don't spread the virus asymptomatically. You have a source on this?
I believe you're wrong.
I don't think I'm hysterical, but even if I were, I'd rather make smart choices than let myself be tone policed.
I'm not a bot, but there's no way to prove that without sounding (even more?) like a bot.
What's your point ?
Better to be hysterical than bury your head in the sand.
You're stating your opinion as if it's fact.
Endemicity requires predictability, which we don't have.
Permanent masking is only a consideration as long as weaklings like yourself raise a white flag rather than argue for society wide mitigation.
How am I hysterical?
And how smart are they if their measures only cover around 50% of infection scenarios?
Which ones, exactly ?
People choose if, when and who they kiss.
Not so for shared air.
Please identify the lie.
Given asymptomatic transmission, you seem awfully comfortable infecting, and likely eventually killing, people. In particular for a former masker.
He wants better stats out of the BLS. He will eventually find someone willing to spit out the stats he wants, regardless of the underlying reality.
And then BLS stats will be seen as just another form of propaganda.
What is this showing ?
I don't recognize the app...
Zohran Mamdani is saying things like “poverty is a policy choice and politicians have a duty to their constituents to make their lives affordable” and it is making a lot of politicians very very scared that they may actually have to start doing some actual service in their public service jobs.
Competent but no great tranformative vision to be found with him, for sure.
Meh. I ask it for suggestions. Some are good, some aren't.
Just hang a paper bag nearby and they will clear out.
Turtles are better than people.
@msnbc.com reporter at the 1:15 mark.
“The chaos you’re seeing is not the result of peaceful protestors, it’s the result of actions of law enforcement, specifically the Los Angeles sheriff’s department.” #nokings
It's so very easy to get hooked...
Ils contrôlent pour les effets de l'infection elle-même ?
Si non, c'est foncièrement nul et ne devrait pas se rendre à la publication.
