Trending
's Avatar

@shmambytandenbaum

75
Followers
440
Following
63
Posts
13.11.2024
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by @shmambytandenbaum

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

03.10.2025 22:14 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

You’re missing the joke here. OP says Kirk has been memory holed. They respond “who” like they’ve memory holed him

03.10.2025 13:35 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Manic Pixel Dream Girl

03.10.2025 12:04 👍 2 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0

What’s funny is I see these ads everywhere and I still don’t know what this ugly necklace does

27.09.2025 17:32 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Jeez, seriously!

21.07.2025 23:44 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Both threads here are worth reading.

I’ll just add that K&S should think long and hard about whether they should welcome an attorney back into partnership who spent his time in government misleading courts.

11.07.2025 18:14 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

@schumer.senate.gov as a constituent of yours - are you really gonna let Fetterman talk like this? NYers are fired up about Mamdani. We don’t need to hear what some DINO in PA thinks about this.

11.07.2025 14:07 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

I guess running a company with a Hitler-bot was the breaking point

09.07.2025 15:08 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Dare I say, I think Stancil is just talking about charisma

25.06.2025 18:59 👍 10 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Today's Skrmetti opinion is devastating to transgender children and families who live in states with cruel laws barring gender affirming care. But it is very important to recognize this opinion does not give private entities, legislatures, or the President carte blanche to discriminate! 1/x

18.06.2025 18:59 👍 430 🔁 144 💬 4 📌 22

I'm also not sure it is fair to say he is "constantly insisting" that people pay for a subscription.

22.05.2025 15:19 👍 12 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Some minor good news, but worth celebrating.

01.05.2025 17:49 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Chief Justice Roberts absurdly declared he “overturned” Korematsu while authoring Korematsu II (validating the Muslim Ban, Trump v Hawaii)

Now we have a new Japanese internment - expanded to any nationality, internment in offshore gulags.
Now let’s see Roberts put his money where his mouth is.

23.04.2025 12:53 👍 54 🔁 23 💬 4 📌 3

how do you take the fact that Alito did not sign off his dissent with either "I dissent" or "I respectfully dissent"?

20.04.2025 11:20 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Almost certainly an anti-Semitic hate crime. And the President who is trying to tear up the American university system on the pretext of fighting anti-Semitism hasn't said a word.

14.04.2025 13:11 👍 1617 🔁 444 💬 60 📌 15

He has the opposite of fuck you money

09.04.2025 21:07 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Stocks are soaring because it's always great when someone just stops hitting you with a hammer. But when they stop, the next step is to take the hammer out of their hands.

Congress needs to take back its tariff authority. And we need to keep saying it until it happens, in this Congress or the next.

09.04.2025 17:49 👍 1143 🔁 252 💬 46 📌 15

Mb...Does seem good to make the 5th circ a less attractive place for buckwild partisan arguments, though. Currently there's a pipeline from Amarillo to SCOTUS, and SCOTUS is only marginally reigning these decisions in.

08.04.2025 16:05 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

JD talked a lot about birthrate on the campaign trail, and maybe he just meant he wants people on the right to have more kids.

Because I think I'm not alone in being concerned about the viability of raising children in a country with entrenched, and increasingly partisan vaccine skepticism.

03.04.2025 18:29 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

We all knew that Trump had little regard for national security, what with the shower files and all. But c'mon.

25.03.2025 23:38 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

BUT HER EMAILS!

Fr tho, this is a crazy breach and a total unforced error. Omigod.

24.03.2025 17:54 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

I still remember the objections to his nomination that he lacks the judicial temperament. Ah well.

20.03.2025 19:06 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

The fight has always been about the boundaries of acceptable speech. This is merely the latest, and admittedly most concerning, instance in a long-running trend.

20.03.2025 16:26 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Republicans don’t like cancel culture because the targeted speech there overwhelmingly came from older, white, and male speakers. But for years now, that same party has targeted speech by banning books, passing ridiculous content moderation laws, and pushing for NYT v. Sullivan to be overturned.

20.03.2025 16:26 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Here’s the problem with this framing. Both parties have advocated for certain types of speech to get less protection. It is not the case that Republicans have suddenly switched their view here - it is that, with power, they are going further in punishing that speech than they have before.

20.03.2025 16:26 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Hold firm, Senator!

12.03.2025 23:03 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Window 10 to Linux. You’ve already switched from 10 to 11, so the og post is not a comment on your circumstances. And yet, you commented.

09.03.2025 13:05 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Wow so it sounds like this doesn’t really apply to you but you complained anyway

09.03.2025 12:37 👍 7 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0

Johnson's stupid expression going "hardy har har isn't it fun when we joke about imperialism. silly guy!"

06.03.2025 01:04 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0