I'm very partial to Palmeiras for numerous reasons, but I just love the font
I'm very partial to Palmeiras for numerous reasons, but I just love the font
Which ones?
Actually, yeah. On this front you're so exhaustively right I have nothing to add.
Tbc, these are some of my wider thoughts on it. It's just that the absolute deluge of ableism, not just in slurs or attitudes but in advocating for eugenicist, Nazi policy, is inexcusable.
Well, the BBC did fuck up. But they did forewarn. Other than editing and providing better care after the fact, what else would you have them do?
I mean he left the room once it started playing up? And not all disabilities are alike and there's no broad foundation here. I'm disabled and miles away from this. Heck, the vast majority of people with Tourette's don't have this kind of experience.
Why do you think it's bad to yell "fire" in a crowded theatre, exactly. Maybe you didn't understand the comparison you made because that analogy is literally about causing a fatal crush of human bodies. As in, as historical events in the plural.
Also, yes he would be allowed to stay in that room. Because people would contextualise it. Same as in the airport.
Haven't seen concrete evidence but apparently yes, people in the audience were forewarned. The BBC fucked up most with its shit apology and including it in the delayed broadcast. It also, categorically, isn't a trigger for potentially immediately killing a bunch of people, that's a weird comparison.
He gives talks in schools where he shouts that he's a pedophile. People with coprolalia go through airport security screaming that they have a bomb and will shoot everyone.
Such a funny "I'm not touching you" act.
Oh that happened to me because I pointed out how infested femboy culture is with pederasty and then a very insecure person in their mid thirties decided to lie profusely about what was and wasn't said.
I think "I won't fuck your kind" is on a different scale to "I will groom, abduct, rape, and traffic your kind" and none of us need to lose sight of that to talk about our problems.
As part of this, people really need to understand pederasty as a heterosexual power structure.
It's not just men who happen to be pedophiles. It's not just that Elon Musk is a pedo guy. It's fucking children to a promotion in your social and economic position. That's how it works.
Elites inevitably tend towards child sexual abuse because they only feel safe if every other powerful person on earth is aomeone they could mutually destroy. It's also because their obsession with power leads to the expression of power via ultimate sexual violence.
We have such a problem when the Epstein files are understood as a bunch of perverted men with unacceptable sexual desires when it's about ultimate expressions of power, compromat, the planned demise of democracy and rituals to bind members of the elite class to one another.
American freedom is the extremity of "you can pick any color, as long as it's black" and they simply act as if this isn't the case.
In Capitalist America, even in times of peace, it is common for people to be arrested for trying to walk to work rather than drive. If you spend some time hanging out in a public space, this is considered suspicious enough to be an arrestable offence. They call this freedom.
Nothing funnier than trying to treat Mark fucking Carney as some naive activist rather than the steady-pair-of-hands-to-the-point-of-celebrity banker he is.
Getting called a victorian orphan by my girlfriend for liking and eating porridge as if it's not tasty, insanely cheap, healthy, and easy to always have in store. Water, honey, salt is a great combo for it and not all of us can be eating breakfast burritos like π€
this will make transfemicide easier, which is exactly what the british media, british government, and brianna's family want
Are you claiming that this essay is transphobic?
All of the leading figures of metoo are trans inclusive, again AFAIK. There was never a schism. I don't see how point a connects to point b. I think this is a hallucination.
Outside of extremely privileged British media classes, gender critical ideology in this era is largely an online radicalisation phenomena funded by overt right wing money, including from Russia and evangelicals (according to the council of Europe and others). I don't see what metoo has to do with it
I think they were concurrent, but not connected unless there's something I'm fully unaware of. The rise of gender critical crap did not have any attachment to metoo AFAIK. It was mostly a response to gay marriage and hundreds of millions spent by the likes of hands across the aisle.
Did this happen? Where?
Going to the source on black feminism is like being given oxygen straight from the tank. Truly. It's probably *why* it gets passed through so many layers of bullshit before it reaches most people's ears. Otherwise, it'd be too potent.
youtu.be/kuGDKLqGiCQ?...
If you're going to invoke her name to criticise the hashtag movement, here she is just 3 weeks ago crediting the viral hashtag for getting 20 years of work done in 8. Also, watch the whole video. It's really fucking good and she deserves to be *properly* heard.
The problem with MeToo is that it became, in the public imagination, a way to just take down the big baddies in society. That it naturally bent with pre-existing systems of oppression to focus on celebrity, narrative, and never on systemic issues. It's not people saying "me, too"