Nah it's all marketing. A bubble. Going to pop anytime now. Stochastic parrot.
:( /s
19.02.2026 21:34
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Nah it's all marketing. A bubble. Going to pop anytime now. Stochastic parrot.
:( /s
excellent piece, and should be required reading for anyone skeptical of the technical capabilities and policy implications of AI.
there are certainly exceptions, but by and large, the political left is currently treating what should be a five-alarm fire like a distasteful spectator sport.
One of the primary problems this site has in its illiteracy is seeing this true statement and being utterly incapable of understanding it as a description rather than an endorsement
Many of them actually. Top of mind because I re-read them yesterday): Nickerson 98 on confirmation bias, Klayman and Ha 87 on hypothesis testing. Just because there is a lot of nonsense doesn't mean the field hasn't generated useful knowledge.
Very important paper, both empirically (for our understanding of human behavior) and methodologicaly (for our future inquiries into human behavior).
After a popular psychological manipulation turns out to be non-replicable (e.g., "in a seemingly unrelated task" behavioral priming interventions), it is always fun to go back and find the papers who reported "p < 10e-8" effects.
No, wait, it's not fun actually.
turkerview.com/requesters/A...
www.mturkcrowd.com/threads/05-2...
www.reddit.com/r/mturk/comm...
This hasn't received much attention, but it looks like scammers also hacked into Francesca Gino's MTurk account, and asked MTurkers to buy her book Rebel Talent to boost the first-week sales of the book.
Poor lady cannot catch a break.
(links in comments)
Merry Cubemas!
His account got hacked.
If you want to submit your research to HotFresh Research News or find a boilerplate letter to refuse reviewing for closed journals, visit this link
learnmoore.org/hotfresh.html
For Sunday at the SJDM conference, please note the following changes to the program!
Repost this to let people know you are at SJDM 2025 in Denver!
Tag @sjdm-tweets.bsky.social
if you would like us to repost stuff that you post!
#SJDM2025
If you're attending @sjdm-tweets.bsky.social or @psychonomicsociety.bsky.social this week, do not print your poster on site at the convention center -- it's $100 more! There's a FedEx a short walking distance away. Please tell your students!!
Halloween is the best holiday. Change my mind.
When it's Halloween, but your 2.5yo daughter insists that "we should bring the skeleton inside" and "make it cozy with a blankie and a pillow".
We Taught This Chimpanzee to Understand the Median Voter’s Politics and He Hanged Himself
take this quiz then tell me you can win over low-info "moderates" on policy
it's just vibes all the way down
An LLM-produced essay is tangible proof that a student doesn’t care, and yet responding to it properly requires hour upon hour of careful work. It’s asymmetrical and overwhelming.
Cheating with an LLM is the easiest thing in the world for a student to do, but it creates a massive, laborious headache for a prof, if you intend to take it seriously. There’s meetings, emails, discussions, moral dilemmas. It’s just incredibly burdensome, on top of everything else right now.
Wait until you learn about common ways of doing segmentation analysis in marketing.
"Yeah, we ran a K-means algorithm, gave each cluster a cute name and a persona, and now we're making every decision based on whether Pumpkin-Spice Peggy or Truck-Nut Terry will like it".
Trust me, the verb is appropriate 😂
Oh my god thank you! I needed it the other day and could not find it, so I recreated a worse one in PowerPoint...
BRB, petitioning the Office of Weights and Measures.
Cool and normal
(The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel approach is NOT an interaction test: It tests whether an association between two variable exists after controlling for a stratifying variable).
If, as a reviewer, you see an unusual statistical test being reported in a manuscript, it never hurts to double-check whether the test does what the authors claim.
Who knows, it might help a journal not publish inaccurate results.
I have many thoughts about Charlie Kirk—and perhaps even more about the white elites, including some on the left, who insist we can’t hold multiple realities at once. We can. And we must.
A brief 🧵
Google's Gemini AI tells a Redditor it's 'cautiously optimistic' about fixing a coding bug, fails repeatedly, calls itself an embarrassment to 'all possible and impossible universes' before repeating 'I am a disgrace' 86 times in succession
I'll admit, I was skeptical when they said Gemini was just like a bunch of PhDs. But I gotta admit they nailed it.
