Care to lay a wager on whether this gets appealed? Because I can certainly see a win-win $$$$ settlement here for plaintiffs' counsel and Anthropic...
24.06.2025 18:16
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Care to lay a wager on whether this gets appealed? Because I can certainly see a win-win $$$$ settlement here for plaintiffs' counsel and Anthropic...
Wow, the deeper you look, the more this CJEU referral on AI seems like a real mess.
copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2025/05/28/d...
First case on AI and copyright referred to the CJEU
Most people who have been paying attention to the copyright and AI debate in Europe has been expecting that at some point the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) would be tasked with interpreting some of the existing exceptions…
Also tech-lash more generally. Change brought by tech innovation is now viewed with suspicion in many quarters.
OpenAI's Jason Kwon: "To sustain America’s AI lead and maximize its benefits for education, science, and healthcare, policymakers must ensure that copyright law fulfills its constitutional mandate to encourage creativity and innovation."
www.foxnews.com/opinion/ais-...
Mat Dryhurst and Holly Herndon have been creating amazing art with AI tools for over a decade. Mat's take on the proposal for a UK copyright exception for AI training is worth reading. x.com/matdryhurst/...
Good first take on the ruling from @matthewsag.bsky.social, one of the country's leading experts on this area of law: matthewsag.com/thomson-reut...
Google says this started in mid-2024 tho? Can anyone confirm?
First AI fair use ruling, but probably of little predictive value for the big pending genAI cases, as it involved an AI developer that copied Westlaw headnotes to train a legal research model to directly compete with Westlaw (at least that's how the court describes it).
The best explainer of all this that I've seen so far is from Stratechery: stratechery.com/2025/deepsee...
The best analysis of the whole DeepSeek news is from Stratechery. But I worry that it's too "technical" for non-AI nerds to easily digest. Reminds me of the early days of the Internet boom, when a similar gap opened up for a short while.
stratechery.com/2025/deepsee...
And, of course, Congress can fix this anytime it likes.
Prediction: lawsuits over data scraping will be litigation trench warfare, where sapping your adversary's resources is at least as important as prevailing. Example: X v. Bright Data.
Couldn't have said it better.
brought to you by the ever useful chatgptiseatingtheworld.com and @edleeprof.bsky.social
Latest update from the copyright vs. AI front.
chatgptiseatingtheworld.com/2025/01/09/h...
Ah, so that's what cowardly bootlicking sounds like?
"The Parties’ stipulation resolves Publishers’ pending Motion for Preliminary Injunction in part, as it relates to Publishers’ request for a preliminary injunction requiring Anthropic to “maintain its already-implemented guardrails” but does not resolve the question about training future models.
Will Keep be the app where notes from the impending Google sunglasses go?
I look forward to this every year.
web.law.duke.edu/cspd/publicd...
Amen. Didn't realize they had US distribution again!
Hey copyright friends, anyone have an EU copyright nerds starter pack? @hutko.bsky.social @technollama.bsky.social
And also if you are interested in AI, @emollick.bsky.social is the first (and maybe only) feed on the subject to follow.
Yes, this.
