Not nearly as celebrated as she really should be (glad for this account's posts), but she does get far more credit for her work than ever before. Indeed, what a brain!

Saw someone the other day say they either see the complicated analysis of geopolitical conflicts or rocks shaped like dicks in their feed and, I have to say, that was an interesting/fun diversion that "celebrating" how a critically endangered ground dwelling parrot got it on a lot may come close to.

Which oligarch doesn't have our confidential government data at this point is the real question; because even the piss ants have it, so it should be understood they absolutely do, no? 🤬

😭 that's what I worry about, especially w/ a different nephew who "cut his adult teeth" on Rogan & doesn't believe his lovely wife frm ecuador is in ANY danger whatsoever. Any discussion about it & he just talks ovr people, my sister says. She told my sister she carries her green card, buut ya know.

But, *it worked* on a LOT of guys who don't see themselves (or friends/family/community) outside of blue collar oriented professions, so who are they listening to when they think they've been hearing objective voices "just" talking abt economic issues? It can often just begin w/ populist messaging.

I say that b/c I have a nephew who was solidly a Bernie guy & last time I saw him he was spouting right-wing talking points, something... something.. "bring back manufacturing" & that sounds good on paper, but it was never really gonna materialize in any REAL way > no VIABLE PLAN was ever put fwd.

Got you. There's no dismissing what's happening as being "mostly online" & ppl do believe that. Whatever they're putting out there & consuming, they're carrying it into the "real world" in some form. I wonder what statistics are on being 17-37 y/o white guy & following at least 1 right-wing creator.

That docuseries The Family, wasn't that about US lawmakers taking their Christian nationalism abroad and helping conservatives in their respective countries get their legislative agenda passed and build movements? Give Christian nationalist propagandists funded platforms and it grows exponentially.

In contrast to the coverup of the EPSTEIN crimes here in America, there are ongoing investigations in the UK, France, Turkey, Poland, Latvia & Lithuania that is sure to expose his central, filthy role in the largest crimes against humanity case in world history. #AccountabilityIsComing

*chronically online to include: podcasts, sports content (with "social" interacting), gaming, SM, chatting/group apps, run of the mill web pages and substacks & general commenting on just about any content out there -- it's all exposure to ideology they may not have encountered before in their homes

Oh, and yes, women are/become fascists also, as you said, but the explosion of manosphere content on SM (and it has been 1) isn't 1) particularly aimed at them & 2) will be less likely to pull them in than, say, Christian nationalism pushed at them incessantly. Chronically online IS our reality now.

.. EASIER, the young men more accessible, & on a scale that's worldwide.

Nazis used/wielded the resources at their disposal to "capture" their audiences, much as modern-day fascists today do at a scale they couldn't come close to reaching.

1 click on Jordan Peterson & algorithms are FEEDING them.

.. then algorithmS lead young men deeper into the worst of the worst?

There have actually been studies about radicalizing young men frm YouTube content & the numbers are beyond concerning, now add in the reach & chronically online (odds).

No one said it's entirely the internet, but it's made it...

Points taken, but also, you don't believe that a whole lot of young men didn't start out bigoted & racist until algorithms incessantly pushed manosphere dudebro content in their faces and eventually things struck nerves, maybe some misogynist creator who they related with b/c HS is 1 big clique, ...

Them coming forward isn't going to stop THE REGIME, not now, and it's wishful thinking to pretend otherwise... even as much as I'd also "like" them to, it seems a damn big risk to them AND their families to be labeled traitor & paraded around for GOP propaganda while they have EVERY lever of power.

What is it you think they'll accomplish when they "get the truth out there" w/ their names made public *at this juncture*? Have you at all considered that midterms are around the corner & MAYBE they're thinking strategy for WHEN is the BEST USE of their voices coming fwd that MIGHT actually do good?

I was speaking of a multitude of things our servicemembers might be choosing not to *come forward about*, not following illegal orders.

Whatever they come forward about *will not be investigated* in any real sense of the word and the complicit majority in Congress will DO nothing about it either.

As I understand it, retribution in the military can be unlike anything we see in civilian life, so many soldiers are afraid to come forward and there will be NO reprieve with these traitors in command. I understand the sentiment and generally agree, but if they're relieved of duty, who'll document?

Ben Stiller also did, if memory serves

*aimless young men with a lot of angst who are chronically online listening to the likes of Rogan et al...

(definitely makes sense)

Hey press, SUPER glad you're talking about this, don't get me wrong, but uhh...

It's modern day GOEBBELS level propaganda meant to speak to Christian nationalists and the dudebro manosphere guys, like chronic Rogan listeners.

Maybe it's time to lift the press veil and TALK ABOUT *THAT*, huh?

If I’m ever killed during war, you can skip the dignified transfer. Being met by a pedophile in a baseball hat, a prostitute and a couchfucker, isn’t my idea of dignified.

Thankfully, as is the case with many authoritarian regimes convinced of their own righteousness, who are really just self-serving themselves to the government coffers they berated to help them secure power.

Could potentially explain a lot though (an "lol" seems kinda inappropriate here, but also I'm replying to dishing them out like smarties lol!).

I'm not pointing fingers, but asking, I guess... seems like each reply has, at least minorly, deflected frm the fact reporting indicates Pentagon threats were related SPECIFICALLY TO removing required human intervention re: mass surveillance & fully autonomous weapons, not facilitating a change ovr.

Ha ha ha. Aww *chef's kiss*! Those echo chambers won't feed themselves, so best you cut off anyone who doesn't want to get blasted w/ posts because you were spreading misinformation, even though literally no one agreed with nor condoned A SINGLE THING the DNC did.

Have the day you deserve, cupcake!

Those aren't facts. I'm not debating opinions with you and you can quit blasting me just because you misspoke about what courts said.

You're entitled to have whatever opinions/perceptions you have, that's not what anyone disagreed with though.

I mean, they are the toughest dudebros around, so they say.

Underrated ⬆️

Well, I messed the end of that up lol