Elizabeth Crockett's Avatar

Elizabeth Crockett

@elizabethgc

SVC B.S. Psychology ‘24 | Social Psychology Research | PhD Applicant https://www.linkedin.com/in/elizabeth-c-9a6067165?utm_source=share&utm_campaign=share_via&utm_content=profile&utm_medium=ios_app

241
Followers
924
Following
7
Posts
04.03.2025
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Elizabeth Crockett @elizabethgc

Post image Post image

The more active users are on social media, the more polarized they are!

The opinions of the these extreme users are filling your newsfeed, but they are not representative of most citizens or even most social media users--which are far less polarized! arxiv.org/pdf/2603.021...

09.03.2026 14:36 👍 28 🔁 17 💬 2 📌 1

Congrats!

04.03.2026 04:08 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Post image Post image Post image Post image

I am excited to share that I presented my research twice at the Society for Personality and Social Psychology conference in Chicago!

I am grateful for this opportunity to connect with amazing scholars within the field of Social Psychology and begin sharing my research with a wider audience!

02.03.2026 16:08 👍 8 🔁 2 💬 1 📌 0
Abstract: This piece critiques the dominant assumption in social and political psychology, as well as in political science and other disciplines, that polarization is inherently undesirable and should therefore be reduced under all circumstances. We argue that this premise reflects a neutrality bias (or depoliticizing bias) that obscures the asymmetrical nature of contemporary political conflict. We distinguish democratic polarization—agonistic contestation among actors who accept multicultural pluralism, democratic institutions and election outcomes, civil and human rights, and epistemic accountability—from anti-democratic polarization, in which conflict is strategically mobilized to delegitimize opponents, erode institutional constraints, and normalize dehumanization, scapegoating, misinformation, anti-scientific, and conspiratorial narratives as a route to political power. In a global context marked by the growing...

Abstract: This piece critiques the dominant assumption in social and political psychology, as well as in political science and other disciplines, that polarization is inherently undesirable and should therefore be reduced under all circumstances. We argue that this premise reflects a neutrality bias (or depoliticizing bias) that obscures the asymmetrical nature of contemporary political conflict. We distinguish democratic polarization—agonistic contestation among actors who accept multicultural pluralism, democratic institutions and election outcomes, civil and human rights, and epistemic accountability—from anti-democratic polarization, in which conflict is strategically mobilized to delegitimize opponents, erode institutional constraints, and normalize dehumanization, scapegoating, misinformation, anti-scientific, and conspiratorial narratives as a route to political power. In a global context marked by the growing...

“Not all polarization is equivalent nor undesirable”

New preprint by Felipe Vilanova and @flavioazevedo.bsky.social:

osf.io/preprints/ps...

01.03.2026 11:49 👍 37 🔁 17 💬 2 📌 1

“Urging those targeted by discrimination or authoritarian mobilization to empathize with their aggressors mirrors a familiar moral inversion: it relocates responsibility for harmony onto the vulnerable rather than the powerful.”

01.03.2026 11:49 👍 11 🔁 3 💬 1 📌 0
Post image

In an interesting #SPSP2026 talk, @asmiley.bsky.social presented work suggesting that the proportion of out-partisans at one’s church had a curvilinear association with affective polarization—politically balanced churches showed the lowest rates of affective polarization.

01.03.2026 22:45 👍 6 🔁 4 💬 1 📌 0
Post image

Happy conference season!

Looking back at my poster from the 2024 Eastern Psychological Association meeting in Philly.

Wishing everyone presenting at EPA and SPSP this weekend the best of luck!

26.02.2026 19:42 👍 10 🔁 3 💬 0 📌 0

Thank you for sharing this!

26.02.2026 00:27 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Post image

New article in Nature describes a field experiment on X which shows that assigning users to an algorithmic feed pushes conservative content and demotes mainstream news.

Sounds obvious but important in light of prior claims algorithms don't cause attitudinal changes.

www.nature.com/articles/s41...

18.02.2026 18:42 👍 79 🔁 33 💬 1 📌 2
Post image

New paper in Current Directions in Psych Science: journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...

After countless arguments about what tasks ppl should/should not offload to AI, we instead argue that genAI can be used *augment* research protocols in novel ways. I.e. use AI to make better psych experiments!

18.02.2026 22:22 👍 41 🔁 13 💬 2 📌 0
Post image

Across social media platforms, political posting is linked to affective polarization--extreme users post the most.

As polarized partisans increasingly dominate the conversation, casual users disengage and the online public sphere grows smaller, sharper, and more extreme. arxiv.org/html/2510.25...

05.02.2026 20:02 👍 34 🔁 20 💬 1 📌 1
Preview
People choose to receive human empathy despite rating AI empathy higher - Communications Psychology This work explored whether people would rather choose to receive empathy from human or AI empathizers. When given the choice, participants sought human empathy, despite rating AI responses as more emp...

New publication with @dcameron.bsky.social and @minzlicht.bsky.social in @commspsychol.nature.com!

www.nature.com/articles/s44...

AI empathy is good, but would people actually choose to turn to AI for emotional support over a human empathizer?

04.02.2026 23:30 👍 19 🔁 6 💬 2 📌 2

Today in Hagerstown, I stood with Senator Chris Van Hollen and hundreds of neighbors to say clearly: we do not want an ICE facility in our community.

21.01.2026 00:10 👍 45 🔁 14 💬 3 📌 0

Even in the AI era, learning to quickly "read" an academic article is an essential skill.

When I started grad school, I thought I had to read every word, in order, for every article I "read".

I don’t do that anymore.

Here’s how I "read" most academic articles:

25.01.2026 21:36 👍 76 🔁 13 💬 6 📌 8

How can we actually break echo chambers at scale?

Ever notice how some political conversations feel over before they start?
Often, they ended somewhere else — in feeds, podcasts, and videos you never saw.

This isn’t just disagreement; it’s living in separate information worlds. 🧵

27.01.2026 17:16 👍 13 🔁 3 💬 1 📌 0

Someone today sent me some fake news that was also aligned with my views.

I rejected it, completely.

You can do this too.

Don't judge the validity of a statement solely by whether it aligns with your beliefs.

26.01.2026 18:05 👍 25 🔁 5 💬 0 📌 0

Graduate school interview season is approaching.
After ~12 years of interviewing PhD and MD/PhD applicants, I’ve noticed some common interview mistakes that hold otherwise strong candidates back...
#GraduateSchool #PhDLife #MDPhD #GradSchoolTips #AcademicBluesky

👇

23.12.2025 16:15 👍 6 🔁 9 💬 1 📌 0
Preview
I’m going to halve my publication output. You should consider slow science, too If we don’t slow down, the research enterprise is going to crash, argues Adrian Barnett.

Great piece on prioritizing quality over quantity in scientific publication.

For those of us with labs, this necessarily involves shrinking our group size. After I got tenure I started to downsize my lab and have not regretted it one iota. More time for each student & more time to think & write.

20.01.2026 14:21 👍 115 🔁 31 💬 5 📌 11
Post image

Sunday in Sterling, Va. Details and tickets at www.ticketleap.events/tickets/prof... .

02.01.2026 14:40 👍 1 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0

The horrific tragedy at Brown University is the 389th mass shooting this year and the 230th gun incident on school grounds so far this year.

This is not normal and we don't have to live this way.

bradyunited.org
@bradyunited.org

14.12.2025 01:04 👍 2548 🔁 966 💬 83 📌 49

The most precious commodity you have is your attention. You don’t have to waste it on poor-faith debates or arguments with strangers if you don’t think they’ll be productive. You can prioritize the things that matter to you and make your life richer.

30.11.2025 20:00 👍 11820 🔁 3004 💬 131 📌 196
Post image

new paper by Sean Westwood:

With current technology, it is impossible to tell whether survey respondents are real or bots. Among other things, makes it easy for bad actors to manipulate outcomes. No good news here for the future of online-based survey research

18.11.2025 19:15 👍 776 🔁 391 💬 41 📌 126
Screenshot of title page of an article published in the journal "Mass Communication and Society" titled "Understanding the Effects of Visual Misinformation: A Systematic Review of 10 Years (2014–2024)."

Screenshot of title page of an article published in the journal "Mass Communication and Society" titled "Understanding the Effects of Visual Misinformation: A Systematic Review of 10 Years (2014–2024)."

Interesting review documenting the rise in scholarship on visual misinformation, how it is more persuasive than text misinformation, and how #GenAI is both increasing visual misinformation content and being used to combat it. (!)
#PsychSciSky #AcademicSky #EduSky
doi.org/10.1080/1520...

04.11.2025 13:40 👍 36 🔁 17 💬 1 📌 2

We need to talk about how social media algorithms push moms down a slippery slope of distrust.

From "Are my kids getting enough support in school?" To "Maybe I should homeschool." To "Maybe modern medicine is bad."

I've seen this first-hand in research I'm doing on parenting apps. 1/🧵

15.10.2025 12:25 👍 1571 🔁 468 💬 38 📌 63
Post image

Cool new study by @joelleforestier.bsky.social @page-gould.bsky.social & Alison Chasteen

Can social media contact reduce prejudice?

#PrejudiceResearch

psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/202...

03.10.2025 13:34 👍 24 🔁 8 💬 1 📌 0
Post image

Critical ignoring offers some great strategies to help navigate our noisy information landscape.

18.09.2025 16:28 👍 95 🔁 52 💬 1 📌 2
Post image

People across the political spectrum suddenly agree that social media can lead to political violence and online calls for civil war have skyrocketed

I explain how social media rewards negativity, division and hostility--and what we can all do about it: www.powerofusnewsletter.com/p/social-med...

17.09.2025 15:24 👍 19 🔁 15 💬 1 📌 1
Preview
Applying for a Ph.D.? These 10 tips can help you succeed Our Letters to Young Scientists columnists offer their advice

I heard that students need to have a 1st author paper to get into a PhD program

This is not true in psychology--most students we admit at NYU & most of the students from my own lab who got into PhD programs do not have publications, let alone 1st author publications
www.science.org/content/arti...

07.09.2025 22:01 👍 34 🔁 6 💬 1 📌 0

Are you accepting PhD applications in Clinical Psychology for Fall 2026 (U.S.)?
If so, please consider adding your name to the document linked in the comments. Our hope is to help reduce the load on applicants.

Please share widely and on X! #clinicalpsychology @abctnow.bsky.social

04.09.2025 21:31 👍 30 🔁 29 💬 1 📌 2
Post image

I have finally gotten round to writing my AI Use Statement for a grad. course I'm teaching in Gen AI...

I would be grateful of your thoughts!

03.09.2025 18:03 👍 50 🔁 15 💬 5 📌 1