Wordle 1,726 5/6
⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬜⬜⬜⬜🟨
🟨🟩⬜⬜⬜
⬜🟩🟨⬜🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
That hit like a bolt of lightning
Wordle 1,726 5/6
⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬜⬜⬜⬜🟨
🟨🟩⬜⬜⬜
⬜🟩🟨⬜🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
That hit like a bolt of lightning
I mean, why wouldn't they? The US made them a global pariah. Russia was friendly to them. The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
If your device supports Touch ID or Face ID you can just use those
Wordle 1,725 3/6
🟩🟨⬜⬜⬜
🟩⬜🟨⬜⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
That was unexpectedly quick
Yes, htmx does some more stuff in the backend, like rendering partials. But it actually gets rid of quite a lot too–it allows using a single router and a single auth middleware in the entire app. And even the rendering stuff is simplified compared to what you'd do in a SPA
Have you seen htmx.org/essays/when-... ? I found this the opposite of a vitriolic teardown
Wordle 1,724 3/6
🟨🟨🟨⬜⬜
⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Quick one today
Wordle 1,723 6/6
⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜
🟩⬜🟨⬜⬜
🟩🟩⬜⬜⬜
🟩🟩⬜⬜🟩
🟩🟩⬜⬜🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Should have seen that coming
'...using a PC without a Trusted Platform Module...'
Get a PC with a TPM and passkeys will instantly work
No biometric data is ever sent to anyone, it's used only by the user device
Wordle 1,722 4/6
⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩
⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩
⬜⬜🟨🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Solid comeback
I found your libraries very helpful to understand how to simplify WebAuthn implementation as much as possible. In fact I used the server library as a model for my OCaml attempt: github.com/yawaramin/we...
Wordle 1,721 X/6
⬜⬜⬜⬜🟨
⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜
⬜🟩🟩⬜⬜
⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩
⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩
⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩
Lol, weird word
Wordle 1,720 3/6
🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨
🟨⬜🟨🟩🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
You're kidding...
They seem busy with vibe coding. Apparently the future is here or something
Wordle 1,719 4/6
⬜⬜🟨🟨⬜
🟩🟩🟩⬜⬜
🟩🟩🟩⬜⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Difficult repeated letter!
-load if the backend 'templates' have changed, to ensure consistent styles
I've been doing something like this with htmx and can confirm the devex is actually great especially with a fast compile-restart cycle. The unexpected win comes from the abstraction power of just being able to use backend language to write components. One slightly subtle technique: forcing a page-
It's underrated imho!
Wordle 1,718 3/6
⬜⬜🟨🟩⬜
⬜🟩⬜🟩⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
No way...it was a wild guess
So far we have ONE example (Amazon) that pops up a passkey creation UI without explicit informed consent. And in my opinion even this workflow will be a thing of the past once Conditional Create is more widely supported developer.chrome.com/docs/identit...
We already know that passkeys are not designed for people using borrowed/temporary devices. You wouldn't set up a passkey in a shared browser at the public library. Under these assumptions it's perfectly reasonable for Amazon to trigger the passkey UI
FaceID doesn't work if your eyes are closed. Can they physically force you to open your eyes? Is use of force allowed to unlock a device?
OCaml security advisories are published on a mailing list
bsky.app/profile/yawa...
And as I just explained, this is just not possible, are you making a circular argument here
'But what if I don't want to use passkeys'
Forget about passwords. They're an insecure historical artifact. Passwords are like HTTP. We needed to move forward to HTTPS, and now we need to move forward to passkeys.
Wordle 1,717 3/6
⬜🟩⬜⬜🟩
🟩🟩🟩⬜🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Having a relatively uncommon letter in a specific place narrows things down quite a lot...
So just add the passkey? Takes like one second...
Sorry but this is such a niche scenario it can hardly convince anyone that it would be a widespread problem. I have to be using my friend's device so much that I get tired of the passkey prompt. At that point why don't I just ask my friend to set up my own account on this device?