This is brilliant.
14.08.2025 12:59
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
This is brilliant.
Well said, John. Best of luck in the future – you deserve it.
Yeah, I've lost count of the number of seven-year-olds who were disappointed because the last copy of the Old Testament had already been checked out.
I hate misogynists. I have no interest in what their sexuality is.
He called her frit for taking death threats seriously. I wish David Amess had been "frit" and hadn't attended his constituency advice surgery that day. Cashman is a misogynist tosser.
Do people on BlueSky genuinely believe there's any analogy between exercising an adult's judgment over what books might be appropriate for children and the Nazi practice of banning and burning texts they disapproved of?
Apart from children's libraries, of course, where only extremists and groomers want there to be a choice of sexually inappropriate books.
It shows quite breathtaking arrogance and mind-blowing lack of self-awareness for Fife Health Board's KC to complain that Naomi Cunningham doesn't use Upton's preferred pronouns, almost as if she hasn't understood what the case is about.
When old-fashioned democracy simply isn't enough for our pampered little darlings. Latest Substack (£): open.substack.com/pub/tomharri...
Some thoughts on Stephen Fry, the midwit’s midwit, over at @thespectator1828.bsky.social.
www.spectator.co.uk/article/step...
I suppose if you're the kind of person who believes that men can become women, it's a relatively small step to believing that, two months after the Supreme Court ruling, Gender Criticals are losing the argument.
Has Baroness Warsi called Dame Louise Casey a racist yet?
New Substack in Corbyn's new political party: open.substack.com/pub/tomharri...
No, you're anti-Semitic.
Tch! Honestly, standards have fallen since my day . . .
Male MPs should either go back to wearing ties or they should wear shirts that are intended to be worn without ties.
This approach will definitely persuade voters not to support Reform. Definitely.
A genuine question for @stonewalluk.bsky.social: when do you think the Equality Act 2010 will come into force? (The clue is in the title)
If by "transgender females" you mean men, then yes, I have an issue with them using bathrooms provided for the opposite sex. So does every right-thinking person.
Every MP who took a knee. Every politician who claimed not to know what a woman was. Every MP who didn't speak up for the victims of the grooming gangs. Every MP who signed a letter opposing the deportation of foreign criminals. Reform's victory is yours. Own it.
No, I want female-only spaces. I certainly do not want to exclude *any* females. I do want to exclude men (males), however.
You're probably too young to remember this, but "far right extremism" used to mean racist or fascist ideology. Now it means wanting female-only spaces.
Ah! Canadian. It all makes sense now.
I have no religious beliefs with regard to trans people. The only religion here is the one followed by the gender cultists who believe in gender ideology without evidence – the very definition of faith.
They have exactly the same rights to use toilets assigned to their biological sex as anyone else. Just because crazed Marxist college lecturers tell their students that "biological sex" is "pseudoscientific" does not make it so. No court would have any difficulty defining the phrase.
Am I the only person who feels his spidey sense set off by the obsessive and constant demands by men to spend seemingly all their time in women's loos?
