AI is inventing academic articles โ and scholars are citing them bit.ly/4rjLy5t
@afrodita-marcu
Social Psychologist, CPsychol AFBPsS, FHEA, doing psychosocial research in cancer at the University of Surrey. Open Research champion. Health inequalities. Risk communication. Qualitative methods. Co-production.
AI is inventing academic articles โ and scholars are citing them bit.ly/4rjLy5t
www.theguardian.com/technology/n...
"potentially catastrophic effects on cognitive abilities and critical thinking skills". Exactly my thoughts...
"The academic publishers Elsevier, Taylor and Francis and Springer Nature all confirmed to The Observer that scholarly slop is real โ and growing โat scaleโ, according to an Elsevier spokesperson. None were able to share their data, but there are signs the problem is prevalent." Cheers guys.
'The systems now being woven into education are shaped by a remarkably small group of people. Not โthe internetโ as the source of training material. Not โsocietyโ influencing the way we use these tools.'
Fascinating that this comes from within Jisc. 1/3
Many of the problems of open access have been caused by funding organisations providing APC money that goes straight to the publishing industry. It's very optimistic to expect that the same (neoliberal) funders will want to prevent researchers from publishing in for-profit journals.
We are very excited to share the full programme for the London Open Science & Scholarship Festival 2026 and announce that bookings are officially open! โจ
Find all the details on the Open@UCL blog ๐ buff.ly/S7yECkO
Latest substack on Iran by @snellarthur.bsky.social is a must read
substack.com/home/post/p-...
Qualitative Health Research
Special Issue: Intersections (existing, emerging, and imagined) between Artificial Intelligence and Qualitative Health Research
journals.sagepub.com/toc/qhra/36/...
Coming up later this month:
Only one in 40 scientific papers suspected of deploying AI writing tools admits using them, says study which suggests stigma of admitting ChatGPT use might explain exceptionally low figure www.timeshighereducation.com/news/fear-st... via @jgro-the.bsky.social
โComputer literacy. Internet literacy. Social media literacy. Mobile literacy. Virtual reality literacyโฆThe pitch to train schoolchildren on the latest tech has stayed roughly the same since the introduction of personal computers in the late 1970sโฆโ
And yes indeed, we do fall for it every time.
"large language models such as ChatGPT were consistently advising women to ask for lower salaries than men in recruitment processes,... AI tools already in use by more than half of Englandโs councils were downplaying womenโs medical conditions, potentially resulting in unequal care"
Whether writing a paper or a book, find out how to improve your academic writing at each stage of the process: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/campus/take-your-academic-writing-skills-next-level #AcademicWriting #AcademicChatter #ECRchat #PhDSky #Academia
Academic #writing is often framed as something faculty should simply manage better; when they struggle, the blame is put on the individual academic. But this explanation doesnโt hold, as Rachel Gabriele explains: https://ow.ly/kFFA50YiI3g #Academia #HigherEd #AcademicSky
Iโm giving the 40th Annual Health Services Research Lecture (which will be the inaugural Nick Black lecture) in March on โthe promise and pitfalls of AI in healthโ. All welcome!
www.lshtm.ac.uk/newsevents/e...
โOpen research is about more than the tightening of analytical and methodological standards. The movement also invites us to reconsider how, and by whom, knowledge is created, shared and evaluatedโ
By @maddipow.bsky.social, @drcpennington.bsky.social, & @flavioazevedo.bsky.social
#MetaSci #OpenSci
Gina Neff, prof. of responsible AI at Queen Mary University of London: the โ 'problem with bad AI Overviews is by design' and Google was to blame. 'AI Overviews are designed for speed, not accuracy, and that leads to mistakes in health information, which can be dangerous.' โ
New OA article just out on "assetizing academic content" led by @jkom.bsky.social with me, @keanbirch.bsky.social & Klaus Beiter, exploring how academic materials are turned into value-generating digital assets by HE institutions, edtech platforms, and AI companies link.springer.com/article/10.1...
Is notion of a reproducibility crisis in science "exaggerated"?
After ERC's Maria Leptin suggests just that, @fionamcintyre.bsky.social talks to those studying the issue.
To judge whether there's a crisis, we would need to know "normal" level of reproducibility, says @martmichaelis.bsky.social
@dmaupin.bsky.social Food for thought!
Four senior UKRI leaders appeared at a press briefing this morning in the wake of RPN stories over the last week about a shake-up to research council funding
Our story that the MRC is expecting to fund fewer grants through applicant-led calls that closed in September last year was confirmed
...
It's also a reminder of the consequences of pandering to the 'legitimate concerns' about immigration of the 'left behind' - not least for 'left behind' areas.
๐NEW Open access (free) textbook
Digital Co-Production of Public Services: Citizens, Challenges and Cases
www.elgaronline.com/edcollbook-o...
๐ข Webinar - Process evaluations: How do we explain why interventions work or cause harm?
Join Prof Rhiannon Evans (Cardiff University) for a talk on process evaluations, covering causal pathways, implementation, context & key frameworks.
๐ universityofgalway-ie.zoom.us/webinar/regi...
๐
12/02 @ 1pm
For more than a century, scientific journals have been the pipes through which knowledge of the natural world flows into our culture, @rossandersen.bsky.social writesโnow theyโre being clogged with AI slop:
New CfP in Qualitative Research in Psychology:
๐ฎ "The Future of Rigorous Qualitative Research"
We're inviting papers that address the big question: What does the *future* of good, quality, rigorous qual research look like?
๐ Deadline Sept 2026
๐ฌ Happy to answer Qs
docs.google.com/document/d/1...
What should we do as editors when a reviewer has clearly used AI to write their peer review?
In my opinion, this is academic misconduct. But it's almost impossible to prove. Should we just ignore the review? Should we report it to their employer? Should we have a blacklist of suspect reviewers?
Saturation in Qualitative Health Research: An Overview and Analysis Through the Lens of Epistemic Injustice
Jackson Loyal and Michelle Amri
journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10....
If you think you know what constitutes best practice in #QualitativeResearch methods in #HealthResearch, here's a list that may confirm or challenge your understanding ๐
If it challenges you, perhaps give the full paper a read? link.springer.com/article/10.1...
#academicsky #ImplementationScience