they can definitely do more than parrot incorrect police wording
they can definitely do more than parrot incorrect police wording
Lack of safety for those who need it the most and the horrific outcomes are often understated or obscured by media & police.
Not @citynewscalgary.bsky.social, reporting here how an elderly pedestrian was "struck by a motorist", not a "collision with a vehicle"
www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQIw...
today we can add our "demon of the streets" person crossing the road, terrifying distracted and obscured-vision drivers
Perhaps media, here @globalnews.ca, should centre key wording around witness and local resident statements - "a tragedy" - vs police statements which incorrectly use the English language to obscure the role of drivers, one of whom fled the scene
globalnews.ca/video/117203...
every darn time we cross
Horrific incident in Ottawa last week resulting in one fatality, multiple severe injuries
How often do we hear of an investigation, yet no news of charges
City speed limits should be 30km/h
www.youtube.com/watch?v=03K4...
this is an excellent overview of the research, by @brentbellamy.bsky.social . The SF study is a good one
www.winnipegfreepress.com/opinion/anal...
Right. "War on Cars" in Calgary. sigh. A toddler in a stroller killed in a marked crosswalk. A 70-year old man killed in a marked crosswalk. Reframing as "attack on cars" doesn't make it any more real. Just effin' disgusting and irresponsible.
www.cbc.ca/news/canada/...
if the children of decision-makers relied on walking, we'd have very different decisions made
Ok but also let's bring the death of street hockey into the conversation.
Cars cost us the gold medal.
somehow we have developed and normalized an infrastructure-caused deathtrap for pedestrians, then claim measures which address it have "potential safety impacts"
Nothing could be worse than the status quo - many dozens of serious crashes per year resulting from this trap
Those safer signals could be used effectively with no right on reds (spreadsheet from Ottawa open data)
docs.google.com/spreadsheets...
A whopping and hugely disturbing 56% of pedestrian crashes occurred at Ottawa's signalized intersections since 2017: 1,021 of 1,831 crashes.
There is an obligation to assess an implement safe traffic signals used widely elsewhere in Canada, e.g. Montreal and QC
www.ctvnews.ca/ottawa/artic...
But did it remember to press the beg button
bsky.app/profile/esmc...
A toddler is dead in Calgary because we allow these jacked up SUVs with very minimal forward visibility. The drivers of these canβt see people in the crosswalk.
When will these be banned?
#Calgary
"βOf course, people go, βWow, a ticket for killing somebody.β Itβs like, βYeah, but itβs not murder. So quit clutching your pearls.β β - a retired police officer.
Wow.
signalhfx.ca/halifax-pede...
Elderly person using mobility scooter struck and killed while using a crosswalk.
Nothing noted from the police about an investigation, charges laid, or anything at all regarding the need to slow, look for and yield to vulnerable people using crosswalks
www.ctvnews.ca/calgary/arti...
Yes I saw, great message!
www.reddit.com/r/VictoriaBC...
Driver found 100% responsible.
But how often do we hear this argument about "shared responsibility" from police and authorities?
www.ctvnews.ca/vancouver/ar...
Alberta pedestrians might want to contact their councillor and request this incorrect, highly dangerous advice is removed asap:
"When pedestrians are crossing the intersection, you may proceed only when there is a safe gap between your vehicle and the pedestrians"
no such thing as a "safe gap"
Drivers must yield the right of way to pedestrians. Obviously, passing them while they are still in the intersection is not yielding. People accustomed to driving tend to normalise law breaching at intersections around pedestrians, and consider it harmless
www.alberta.ca/intersection...
From your webpage: "When pedestrians are crossing the intersection, you may proceed only when there is a safe gap between your vehicle and the pedestrians"
Seriously? How is a "safe gap" defined and enforced by the police?
Victoria Police Department: VicPD is urging the community to take extra care on our roads. Since January 1, our officers have responded to a cyclist or pedestrian being struck every single day. To date, this includes 8 pedestrians, 7 cyclists, and 1 person on a scooter. These are not statistics. These are people - your sister, mother, brother, aunts, kids, colleagues, uncles - all walking to work, cycling to school, crossing the street, or simply moving through our community. Each collision carries the potential for life-threatening injury or loss. Road safety is a shared responsibility. Drivers, cyclists, and pedestrians all a have a role to play, but those operating vehicles carry a heightened duty of care. A moment of distraction, speed, or impatience can have irreversible consequences. We are asking the public to slow down, stay alert, and make deliberate, cautious choices behind the wheel. Watch for cyclists. Yield to pedestrians. Put phones away. Take the extra second. Together, we can prevent these collisions. Together, we can keep people safe.
This from Victoria Police is how it should be put. Yes, it's a shared responsibility, BUT between a pedestrian and a car, only one of those has the capability to harm or kill the other
Questions raised after two female pedestrians struck and killed by Surrey Police last month
vancouversun.com/news/surrey-...
Horrific. RIP.
No mention of any driver involvement until some way through this article. Vehicles do not hit and kill pedestrians then flee the scene. Drivers do.
www.cbc.ca/news/canada/...
@michaeljohnlo.bsky.social there are few to no examples of investigative journalism following vulnerable road user crashes of this calibre, thank you.
Tragic incident, truck driver striking a skateboarder on a crosswalk - yet police would not say if they are recommending charges.
Excellent journalism from Michael John Lo who interviews a witness also city engineering staff - who admit the design is dangerous
www.timescolonist.com/local-news/s...
You can be inside a store and classified by police as a "pedestrian".
6 people in the store were struck
www.cbc.ca/news/canada/...
it would say if they were
Four people struck, one killed. Driver not arrested, only comment is that he "remained at the scene"
Police and media never fail to construe the driver as an inactive participant who did the right thing
globalnews.ca/news/1159069...