CfA: Workshop “Philosophical Issues in Neural Computation” (@ruhr-uni-bochum.de) Jun 2–3 2026.
Deadline: March 31.
Further Speakers: @adriendoerig.bsky.social, @francesegan.bsky.social, @olivia.science, @gualtiero.bsky.social, @seelikat.bsky.social, Oron Shagrir.
05.03.2026 15:02
👍 25
🔁 7
💬 0
📌 0
A good contribution to the debate about mental/neural representations
02.03.2026 11:38
👍 3
🔁 1
💬 0
📌 0
Thanks! I wish I had time to read it now 😬
27.02.2026 22:19
👍 4
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
"This is a superb collection and is highly recommended," says Rex Welshon.
24.02.2026 07:20
👍 9
🔁 2
💬 1
📌 0
Beautiful new paper out from the Peyrache lab. Shows an incredibly stable code for head direction.
Representational drift ain't a thang y'all...
#neuroscience 🧪
11.02.2026 20:45
👍 71
🔁 11
💬 8
📌 3
Workshop on Philosophical Issues in Neural Computation
Workshop on Philosophical Issues in Neural Computation
June 02 – 03, 2026
Ruhr-University Bochum
Abstract:
The idea that the brain performs computations is widely accepted in cognitive science...
CfA: Workshop “Philosophical Issues in Neural Computation” (@ruhr-uni-bochum.de) Jun 2–3 2026.
Deadline: March 31.
Further Speakers: @adriendoerig.bsky.social, @francesegan.bsky.social, @olivia.science, @gualtiero.bsky.social, @seelikat.bsky.social, Oron Shagrir.
philevents.org/event/show/1...
12.02.2026 16:32
👍 12
🔁 5
💬 0
📌 1
Workshop 2026 | Merex
Later this month in Berlin, with @laurennross.bsky.social @okaydaniellle.bsky.social @gualtiero.bsky.social
@francesegan.bsky.social @davidcolaco.bsky.social
www.merex-project.org/workshop-2026
10.02.2026 18:36
👍 17
🔁 4
💬 1
📌 1
Flexible use of a multi-purpose tool by a cow
YouTube video by Antonio Jose Osuna Mascaró
youtu.be/bAk4PFEuWKQ?...
20.01.2026 11:21
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
The Brains Blog 20th Anniversary!
YouTube video by Brains Blog
A chat among the past and present editors of the Brains Blog for its 20th anniversary.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jeld...
10.12.2025 21:03
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
PhD applicants typically have no publications. Still, the process is very competitive since we accept only about 4 applicants. If you want more info on hiw competitive you’re likely to be, email me your CV
05.12.2025 11:12
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
If you are applying to philosophy PhD programs, consider applying to Mizzou. I'm Director of Grad Admissions this year so ask me about it. Deadline to be considered for a fellowship is Jan 10.
05.11.2025 22:49
👍 5
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Check out this excellent paper:
05.11.2025 16:18
👍 3
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Looking forward to this too!
29.10.2025 12:28
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
So, I will try to put together a monograph and turn this paper into at least two of its chapters. The monograph is tentatively entitled Neurocognitive Architecture: Foundations for a Unified Theory of Mind and is under contract with Springer for their Synthese Library.
9/
15.10.2025 02:15
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
The paper is 25,000 words, too long for a journal article and yet rather compressed. Several aspects deserve to be addressed in more detail. It would also benefit from being placed in a broader context.
8/
15.10.2025 02:15
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
As always, further feedback is welcome, especially in light of the following.
7/
15.10.2025 02:15
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
The paper defends the Nonclassical LOT thesis that some neural representations represent in a (natural) language-like way, yet they encode information nondigitally and are processed by ordinary (Nonclassical) neural computations that rely not only on syntactic structure but other features.
6/
15.10.2025 02:15
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
(3) It discusses the degree to which different LOT hypotheses are supported or undermined by neuroscientific evidence about computational architecture and concludes that Classical LOT is ruled out while a version of Nonclassical LOT is plausible.
5/
15.10.2025 02:15
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
2) It rebuts some popular arguments for Classical (Fodorian) LOT, including the argument that neuroscientific evidence is merely relevant to how computations are implemented.
4/
15.10.2025 02:15
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
The paper advances the debate in three ways: (1) It distinguishes different LOT hypotheses—including Representational, Computational, Classical, and Nonclassical LOT hypotheses—in terms of the computational architecture they require. This clarifies LOT's empirical commitments.
3/
15.10.2025 02:15
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
The main argument is the same but I've made a few tweaks and added some footnotes. I have now posted it on the ArXiv (link in comments) and a couple of other places so it can be cited in a stable form.
2/
15.10.2025 02:15
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
A paper on mine entitled "Neural Hardware for the Language of Thought: New Rules for an Old Game" has been circulating since early 2025 and has been cited in print. I have received anonymous feedback from some Classical LOT supporters and made some revisions to address their concerns.
1/
15.10.2025 02:15
👍 8
🔁 2
💬 1
📌 0
👇
09.10.2025 19:52
👍 3
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
I don't think you need to go to a lower leve: bsky.app/profile/gual...
09.10.2025 03:00
👍 1
🔁 3
💬 1
📌 0