unless there are extraordinary circumstances at play, yes, it is a rational decision. but it is one that is made without consideration of rationality
but that does not mean that all impulsive decisions are rational, because words mean things
no, it is a rational decision made instinctively and without concern for rationality
a good sign you’re engaging in intellectual masturbation is that you’ve taken the position “words shouldn’t mean anything, and that means i’m right”
the colts had no good options between moving forward or franchising jones until he was healthy and somehow chose a secret worse third option. incredible
but lieutenant dan(iel jones) you ain’t got no legs
Internet famous for being amoral enough to take a bad job and incompetent enough to be unable to do it.
This is also why concerns about Waymo cameras ring hollow for me too: I pull a lot of dashcam footage from bystanders and buses. The panopticon is a nightmare to live in but very convenient professionally
Collision reconstructionist here, I absolutely canvas areas for doorbell camera footage and use them quite frequently. Even have all the standard models calibrated for 3D reconstruction. Most people give it for free but I’ve tossed a few Benjamins too
I mean don’t get me wrong, absolutely in character if he tries to pocket veto and screws up like Paul LePage but no way it’s an intentional strategy
This is technically true but I am not going to pretend that Trump both knows this and is intentionally playing semantic word games.
I don’t support the bill, but I think the key here is 1) Trump promising to not sign any bill until SAVE is passed and even if not, 2) the tax holiday expiring in October, right before the election.
I hate it, but it’s not a total own-goal.
I mean Baltimore doesn’t actually need a reason at all, technically, since nothing is finalized until tomorrow.
oops! all bar referrals
instructions unclear. big ship stuck
so long as you have a lot of boats and aren't particularly fond of them, pretty easy to remove mines
that is certainly a theory, slightly contradicted by the fact that the checks were mostly not actually checks but direct deposits from the IRS
answer is obviously lunch, that’s why we do exactly that for all of our pets.
only way this isn’t true is if you exempt coffee from counting as breakfast
it’s the kind of thing you say when you know no one will check what you’re wearing while you’re “farming”
The voters that won him reelection weren’t those who remembered what their checks looked like 4 years later, they were the ones who couldn’t remember who was president at all during 2020.
everybody loves “put your name on the check” because FDR did it but no one cared when Trump did it before. Voters will just credit whoever is currently president and run it through their own partisan filter
based on the reaction to the signs with Biden’s name on them, who gives a crap
“Espresso Proteini” is a C-grade Bond henchman
none of these words are in the bible
tl;dr: cocaine
it's more likely than you'd think
bsky.app/profile/mtsw...
so, uh, did we ever find out if Ahmadinejad actually survived or not
like has anyone followed up on that
IRAN i wrote but you still ain't calling
Hate on it for being cringe, but Hamilton read farmers perfectly for what they are. “keep ranting, we know who’s really doing the planting”.
An exception to Hanlon’s Razor, where both malice AND incompetence are at play.
Farmers like her and most others are landowners and managers of government-backed businesses, I don’t understand the argument that increased productivity developments are supposedly bad outside of pure rent-seeking.
