I usually say the bad thing but I promptly delete it ๐คโ๏ธ
I usually say the bad thing but I promptly delete it ๐คโ๏ธ
(Delete this section before posting. $5 will be posted into your account) Maybe I need a switch 2???
Ngl I want to play pokopia pretty bad. The only game in the genre I liked is one called graveyard keeper but like, squirtle would be helping me. I'm too solidly millennial to not at least consider buying the switch 2 now.
Not familiar with this tbh. I didn't know he had this obsession while at Facebook tbh. Like, Llava seemed like a reasonable novel training of a decent VLM using relative norms and then they mostly stopped publishing after that afaik.
Also, either way he has kind of earned the right to be a crank to me. In so far as computer vision has guys, he's a big one. He can do orgones as a treat.
It's definitely weird, and I don't consider myself an LLM pessimist. I think the gist of his idea of getting more powerful models (agi?) if he can actually come up with methods for world models sounds pretty intriguing. It sounds intuitive (assuming a working training method no one else knows).
I mostly random posts of his when I check LinkedIn tbh, and maybe you're right, but my understanding was he seems primarily focused on a lack of physics understanding. Like the philo of mind thing about the girl in a black and white world reading about color, but it's practically 1D, just text. No?
I think he believes in Chinese Room stuff, but that it only applies to LLMs and MLLMs specifically, but not models that are trained in a potential secret sauce to understand the physical nature of the world much better, basically.
(Arguably though, that would make it not likely a Chinese Room?)
Lecun thinks LLMs are not capable of understanding the world and can't approach agi. I think gyges disagrees with him, but Lecun is also a very respected guy, (he basically invented CNNs), who just got like a bajillion dollars to work on AI that has world models so everyone is having fun, really.
Singapore and Malacca get Officers of the Deck lives flashing before their eyes lol
Relatedly, how do you make a Whoppers Junior situation possessive? Whopper's Junior or Whoppers Junior's?
I'm not saying Platner is an op, but I can't think of a better potential candidate if you wanted to make one in the most vulnerable state for Republicans. Depressing situation!
Lmao, I had forgotten the context of her No's
Fucking PT ass larping JO piece of shit.
Even if you look at this completely cynically, these guys, I assume, paid for themselves solely based on "what does it cost to shoot a missile at a target with no military value", before you even look at ethics, but Hegseth decided the sissiness of it all wasn't worth it presumably.
Always so stressful when you realize it's surf and turf dinner day lol
Nah lol
BOFA
Hoo boy
Congrats
Things must be so bad if they're saying this.
They might want more funding for pay raises, expansion (in that it gives more room for promotions and thus pay raises), and benefits (essentially tax free pay raises), but basically no one is begging for more funding for wars of adventure unless they are doing so *as* Republicans.
I can't think of any "troop" I have ever served with (outside of explicit Republican partisans) who would see something like this as a betrayal. It's completely made up by chickenhawk elites. Most troops just want to take a nap and collect a paycheck
A reminder on International Womenโs Day that women can do anythingโeven the contract killing of Jeffery Epstein (allegedly)
I could see if there was some uncertainty put into the power of the spice at long time spans, but I don't think there is. He's actually omniscient.
It's so funny that the host of Jeopardy is an excellent and blatantly partisan lib poster.
Normalize asking American tourists where they were on January 6th
God I hate this idea. People are not one more image of a dead baby away from radicalisation. We don't lack will, we lack any real means to act on our will because the left has ceased to be a political project and become a few thousand people trying to Post their way out of Posting.
Then the literal only view anyone can have is solipsism.
If the tests are insufficient, that's fine. But there should be very good reason for rejecting them and not just vibes, and it definitely deserves more thought from a guy who wants to be a public intellectual about the subject than "pee pee poo poo".
We don't have to trust it. We are using the heuristics we instinctually use on anything, or the previously commonly accepted test for thinking machines, which everyone now rejects only bc we made something that passes it.