/.dam G

Not great when the only people in the free world who believe and trust Vladimir Putin’s word on critical things despite all evidence to the contrary are currently running the government of the United States.

Good luck LOL.

I did point out before the 2022 election most people’s definition of corruption was politically motivated disagreement rather than actual corruption but by god this comes across as so much of a sham. Public hearings has to be the first change.

It’s not the AG’s job to micro manage investigations. That’s what’s breaking the Justice Department at the moment. The question is who and what was under active investigation.

Yeah feels GTV in the lower house.

And a god awful second half would have had people switching over.

Yes, goal difference could matter in the 3rd place table.

First touch is going to cost her against faster opponents.

Triggering a NATO response wouldn’t be ideal in any event.

For a course that should be zero, it’s crazy.

Sounds like they’ll beat Aston

I thought they changed that rule…

That needs a referendum that would be virtually impossible given the state disparities.

It’s closer to 75% of every country making it something of a struggle to fix

I assume some sort of AFC min facility rule?

What sort of testing regime are they under with FIFA/WADA I wonder…

The AI is becoming incredibly obvious at least.

Original plan was to show NRL/AFL they could do sports. That failed.

Women’s…

It had to be said until everyone realizes it. The President of the United States is literally INSANE.

I mean it’s like 15% of people on either end of the political spectrum “Don’t mix entertainment/sports and politics or love your politics and free speech on my side” and then middle 70%, “LOL why waste your time and platform on politics, it’s not changing anyone’s mind”.

Majority government, or as few parties as possible, in traditional Westminster style, is about ensuring broad balancing of competing priorities rather than horse trading.

California not a great example of propositions working effectively, massively failing to take account of cons when the pros are populist. National interest is as much about balancing pros and cons as anything populist.

At some point they’ll have to form a party to provide stable support to a government.

At some point they will have to be involved in the governing discussions, at which point both local and national interests will be served by them forming a party.

It is far more scientific than the vibes of most other “freestyle” ski and snowboard events but it massively undervalues actually landing the jump.

We should have a fixed annual by-election date. If member dies, have a temp member until then, otherwise electorate waits until then.

Both sides should be able to look at each other and agree the current levels of partisanship risk revolution and the key response should be to reduce conviction to a 3/5ths majority.

The problem is they are way too powerful, and too heavy, not that they exist.

The sole difference is a simple majority to hold Royal Family accountable vs 2/3rds of the Senate.