Sadly we are used to it. They make themselves look foolish at the end of the day. It’s frustrating how irresponsible they are being, weaponising the issue. It’s like they’re saying the equivalent of ‘the moon is made of cheese, ignore facts, ignore science’
They voted against, ignoring the facts that have been presented re the legal situation. Political game playing at the expense of the environment. Sometimes, LabCon guys, expertise actually needs to be heeded rather than ignored because it doesn’t suit your agenda.
As above, an untrue claim regarding RNLI at Hoylake, who have long confirmed that their access is not hindered by the salt meadow. It’s a misrepresentation to say Greens are trying to obstruct.
Stuart is lying when he says Greens are ‘preventing the RNLI from doing their work’
It has formed due to the rising level of the beach and is a natural development, meaning the edge of the beach has expanded but moved outwards, so access is needed.
Once tidal mudflats and dangerous tidal gullies, Hoylake Beach is now several square miles of open and safe sandy beach with a narrow band of irreplaceable and highly protected embryo dune and Atlantic Salt Meadow. This meadow catches wind blown sand and stops it inundating the road.
Protect the rare salt meadow whilst enabling access to the vast sandy beach —
www.change.org/p/allow-us-t...
jobird.net/2025/wirral-...
Wirral Council sorely needs a new style of leadership that:
* Shows organisation grip
* Shares power fairly and democratically
* Welcomes challenge
* Above all, puts Wirral's people and environment first - not private profit nor personal promotion.
