Is it to keep him awake perhaps
@profclbrown
Aspiring badass. Books, Detroit, judgment/decision research, social change, history, comparative religion, POTTERY, football/basketball, music/theatre/opera, historic clothing. Newly-retired UM professor. Your mom, if your mom swears like a sailor.
Is it to keep him awake perhaps
The people buy their intelligence with money they made from their jobs thatβ¦do not require intelligence, I guess.
There something about that that does not seek like itβs gonna work. π
That dude was todayβs Easy Block
I'm suing Grammarly over its paid AI feature that presented editing suggestions as if they came from me - and many other writers and journalists - without consent.
State law requires consent before someone's name can be used for commercial purposes.
www.wired.com/story/gramma...
I wonder if the Neanderthals got shit from their parents for painting caves instead of hunting and gathering
For those keeping score at home:
I informed Grammarly via email precisely what I thought of their appropriation of my name and reputation and received an email from their head of litigation promising a full response by the end of the week.
To be continued...
Prof Grygiel seems confused about supply v demand. No one would order this stuff if their coffeehouse didnβt put it on the menu.
My husband has become Heat Pump Solar Guy; he does a dance around the living room when he gets the bill every month. He also is never happier than when he is dressed head-to-toe Costco. Itβs a kind of reverse adolescence.
βThe Three Mothers,β by Anna Malaika Tubbs
I think one case might be Shafir Simonson and Tversky on reason-based choice (Cognition 1993) but I will check
I will find it, although the data I myself collected was obama v mccain and never published. Thatβs how dang old I am.
Yes and also just lacks that inclination to be skeptical of the intent of whoever is asking. Human conversation is about motivations and subtext and AI lacks subtext. I think!
Paper I am thinking about compares hypothetical custody decisions w 1 parent has both strong reasons for and against custody, while the other is meh. The respondent is asked why judge should approve or disapprove custody; there is a clear interaction. Extreme parent wins only win the frame matches.
Roughly yes. But ChatGPT seems to be chronically inclined to framing effects (it always wants to accept your premise if it possibly can).
I am retired and logey does this sound right to you? I will dig up a reference if I can
There is a whole lit in my field about differences between βreasons to acceptβ and βreasons to reject,β and ChatGPTβs utter inability to replicate such human judgmental biases is deeply disturbing
I am gonna tell my kids you said this :)
there's a lot going on right now but did you know a massive amount of the world's fertilizer flows through the middle east, and did you know that that fertilizer needs to be shipped to the us *right now* for planting season, and uh did you know we are at war with iran
Yes I come early to help (but ask first). This is the Midwestern Way (Michigan, Indiana).
In March??
Markwayne Mullin Lured From Senate Seat With Promises of Rides In Bitchinβ Jet Plane And Unlimited Chances To Punch Brown People
I got stuck at βwalking down the street without their legs.β
Also: Soleimani????
He demanded that she send him nude pictures and bullied her into a relationship. This is called sexual harassment. It was not βan affairβ. RESIGN NOW.
One Methodist minister, one farmer.
Not rugged myself.
My worry would be that it cant replicate but it certainly can CLAIM to.
When people come together to fight injustice, we can make real impacts.
Deleting the Starbucks app off your phone & getting 5 friends to do the same until baristas win a fair contract is one way you can directly help move the needle towards a better future for working people!
bit.ly/deletetheapp
Agreed about fewer fucks, but equality is hard to experience when women become old enough to be invisible (but men do not). But as I am now older than dirt perhaps I am ahead of you on this. Keep shouting, though :)
A colleague I know had Dan Ariely, now embroiled in his own Epstein Scandal, as a student some point.
I maintain this means he has an Epstein Number of 2. Is this correct?
#EpsteinNumber
You would prefer that, having made the first mistake, they would just give up
I dunno dude: Iβd hope that if my university got it wrong they would still be willing to complain about violations of student civil rights. But maybe thatβs just me.
Unsurprisingly I agree!