Yes, that interview is now mandatory at my job.
Build what should be a week-long project, but explicitly with AI.
02.03.2026 22:00
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Yes, that interview is now mandatory at my job.
Build what should be a week-long project, but explicitly with AI.
I wish I knew then that they were going to be talking horse-calibrated doses.
My mother used to live in a tropical country and had to take it preventively (for evidence-based reasons).
I can’t hear people mention that drug and not think about how, when I mentioned it was a candidate treatment for Covid, she bursted out “Oh, they are going to shit themselves so-o-o bad…”
Not saying which Bush is uncharacteristically ambiguous…
I know, and should I seen who you were earlier.
Then provide evidence and declare war on those? That would allow the EU to decide if they want to evacuate their citizens, or stand with them.
There raised the point at the UN Security Council.
Let’s be honest: you are just here to lie and that’s not helping anyone.
I see a lot of damage report on civilian infrastructure in the region.
The EU citizens are the ones that she’s directly responsible for helping. She’s clearly offering support beyond that, which you can read but chose not to, but there’s a very obvious reason why she mentions people under her care.
I did.
If you don’t want to read the little I put, there, I was right to not make the effort to put more.
Then maybe attack those bases, not downtown Sharjah?
She’s not condemning attacks on America military targets. She’s explicitly saying civilian infrastructure.
Reassure EU citizens in the region?
Pressure the Iranian regime to aim for legitimate military targets?
The UAE hasn’t attacked Iran. Qatar certainly hasn’t.
I don’t think Dubai even has an army.
I don’t want you to walk away with the illusion silence means you are right.
I don’t think I owe you detailed responses.
*IF* he did that, yeah.
He’s confusing a response to a question about how to present your position with a sincere defense about one’s position.
I can say “Hitler gained support by promising full employment” without supporting the guy—I can analyse why he became popular even if he lied to do so.
I got the impression a lot of people in that regime had a bad day. I suspect it took them so long to confirm his death because there wasn’t a lot of people alive to take over, and those who were had to take stock of their unexpected new responsibilities.
They seem to prioritize looking after the innocent victims in their communication.
Because he's misrepresenting the arguments that he's attacking.
I don't
- Who hurt you?
- The poor decisions that lead to Saudia Flight 763 /
Kazakhstan Airlines Flight 1907, Turkish Airlines Flight 981, Air India Flight 182, Saudia Flight 163, Malaysia Airlines Flight 17, Iran Air Flight 655, American Airlines Flight 191, Pan Am Flight 103, Korean Air Lines Flight 007…
Could someone ask him about shooting people who are shipwrecked?
Let’s hope that lasts for a very long time.
That part felt a little SciFi-ish then, but Trump adopting Russian’s “Circle of Influence” theory made it weirdly appropriate.
That particular pundit did say that. A lot.
But when explicitly asked what she could have done differently, he argued: not make him making that argument so difficult. You can’t remove the context of the prompt.
I mean… I’m not a boat captain or working for a shipping company, but I would have told anyone to avoid it immediately.
Because they are actively trying to destroy each other, so only one can survive?
