Here's Houston telling people to "shut up". His claim "if they can come deep, we can come deep too" belied by fact that his group did not come deep to the meeting, there were 36 supporters, an actual verifiable public record of people with strong views, not a promotional video
17.12.2025 20:33
👍 3
🔁 0
💬 2
📌 0
One of the speakers from the recalls-linked media maker that Houston used for his 8 minute presentation. The videographer coaches him at the end to thank the City Council and he does so.
17.12.2025 19:40
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Local journalism, in this economy? This week the Oakland Observer's reporting on proposed Flock expansion and the EAP netted numerous new subscribers.
I am incredibly grateful for everyone's support and could not do this work without you
11.11.2025 20:07
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
About to start a special 9 am city council mtg, ostensibly scheduled to not interfere with election day. But perhaps as also intended, there are no people in chamber as important legislation that changes Rules of Procedure, grants 1 MM/yr contract to ICE-contracting company is up
04.11.2025 16:59
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Five days after publishing powerpoints and press releases about its 2025 poll, I still can't find Chamber of Commerce's data, i.e., number of respondents by gender, race/ethnicity, zip code, income, education, district, etc. I can't think of one decent reason to uphold this info
04.11.2025 00:15
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
A lot happened while Trump was trying to invade Oakland, Council made an unprecedented move that by any measure has undermined the citizen led Police Commission; then for good measure an attempt to sneak EAP into a last minute meeting with a day's notice. oakland.legistar.com...
27.10.2025 15:14
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Thanks to CM Houston, one of only a handful of Black male appointees to Police Commission since its start almost 10 years ago will face more fabricated allegations at a full council meeting after weeks of delays and baseless complaints from a marginal, mostly white, group
18.10.2025 21:47
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Making the original Encampment Abatement reporting thread public as its coming up again. Several videos here from life-long Oakland residents now homeless, and its worth taking a look at.
18.10.2025 01:04
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Oakland has almost half the homicides it had in 2023, a decline that began in mid-2024 and has steadily continued today. There is no way to undercount the murders by a substantive amount.
17.10.2025 18:47
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
How long will Oakland be stuck with a security company linked to key figure in federal corruption case?
It may take three months or longer for a new contract to be prepared, officials estimated.
OO was only publication to note this to date---given new process, its conceivable ABC Security will finish its time w/Oakland after 2 years of non-contracted work. It's mostly bungling at this point; but Gallo specifically asked ABC be awarded contract
17.10.2025 01:10
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Raising barrier to move a consent item to non-consent by a CM means that it will be harder for CMs to move a non consent item to consent to give public a chance to weigh in.
16.10.2025 16:28
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Removing the req that committee split votes send the item to non consent means that with current leadership at Rules and Council, controversial items will lack debate, opportunity for community to contest
16.10.2025 16:28
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Removing the 5pm barrier for non consent, running non consent first, means that most working people will have limited opportunity of interacting with legislation at Council meetings. 5 is already too early, but at least public has a shot of making it
16.10.2025 16:28
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
It's hard to read the substantive changes in Jenkins/Ramachandran proposed Council Rules of Procedure as anything but a way of diminishing public participation in the council process. They'll be discussing them today at Rules
16.10.2025 16:28
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 2
It's also worrisome to see her and other CMs again attack Oakland's volunteer led commissions on issues they know are fallacious rhetoric from those that support breaking the budget for useless public safety theater and disinformation.
16.10.2025 14:50
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Wang is Chair of Public Safety, with the entire legislative database and department directors she can query about anything. But she's made a habit out of referring to half-remembered news articles that themselves are often flawed, instead of using the source at her workplace
16.10.2025 14:50
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
During this time, OPD/Armstrong was never blamed for flubbing ALPR. Local corporate media simply moved on from the issue of ALPR, after helping police-focused CMs and OPD argue PAC was standing in the way of the difference between life and death for crime-fighting
16.10.2025 14:50
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Why didn't OPD ask for Flock? Because they were involved in a years-long ALPR battle premised on the idea that their decrepit vehicle-mounted ALPR was wonderful, & their use policy superb, instead of admitting both were useless and asking to move to another system completely.
16.10.2025 14:50
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
When Flock finally came to Oakland, it sailed through PAC because the OPD worked with PAC to create on paper good use/retention policy [which we now know OPD haven't followed]. The reason it took OPD so long to turn to Flock has nothing to do w/PAC: OPD they didn't ask for Flock
16.10.2025 14:49
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Oakland HOAs are quietly installing surveillance cameras to watch public roads
To fight crime, private neighborhoods are using license plate readers to track cars on city streets. One is already sharing data with police.
I suspect Wang was struggling unsuccessfully to recall an Oaklandside story in which a HOA that already had FLOCK wanted OPD to have it too, to upload specific plate captures to OPD easily. But OPD didn't have Flock yet, so couldn't upload it directly.
16.10.2025 14:49
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
This is CM Wang claiming at a private Chamber of Commerce event that Privacy Advisory Commission prevented a community from buying Flock w/their own funds, using the story to demonize Commissioners. It's false. Only tech owned/run and/or purchased by City needs PAC approval
16.10.2025 14:48
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0