Embrace the Void's Avatar

Embrace the Void

@etvpod

A #philosophy podcast for surviving the worst possible timelines. Hosted by ethicist aaronrabinowitz.net. Ethics director and credentialed creator at creatoraccountabilitynetwork.org. Obsessed with luck. Sibling show: https://0gphilosophy.libsyn.com/

6,639
Followers
4,501
Following
4,811
Posts
08.05.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Embrace the Void @etvpod

Funny, only folks I see using the word betrayed are Fuentis types.

11.03.2026 14:45 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Especially when they’re creepers.

11.03.2026 14:41 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

How else would you describe this? bsky.app/profile/alan...

10.03.2026 18:57 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Fair, I do think there is probably a lot of variation on this subject to go along with the total lack of standardization. In such a mixed climate it's probably still reasonable to be cautious about who you share your AI usage with either way.

10.03.2026 18:55 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

I mean I think the tech is a massive breakthrough on several fronts that will reshape the world as previous technological revolutions have.

10.03.2026 16:23 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

There are also just a very large number of jobs that involve pushing numbers around spreadsheets that are already being automated with human oversight as you suggested. We just don’t see nearly as much talk about it especially in leftist spaces for various reasons.

10.03.2026 15:26 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Sorry, are you confusing insulting assertions with the free exchange of ideas? I missed the part where you actually made an argument instead of just trashing people’s motives.

10.03.2026 15:21 πŸ‘ 7 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

I dunno how much credibility I have with anyone these days but happy to help!

10.03.2026 15:19 πŸ‘ 4 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Thank you for contributing your case in point.

10.03.2026 15:15 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

lol. Lmao.

10.03.2026 15:11 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Agreed for a lot of jobs.

10.03.2026 14:58 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Fair I can pass that along to Ella and ask if the my address it in the full paper.

10.03.2026 14:52 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

I will say the AI need better filters on who they cite. They often cite popular terrible people.

10.03.2026 14:46 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

I read that piece and thought it was interesting and then didn’t post about it cause I didn’t have it in me that day. πŸ˜…

10.03.2026 14:44 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Agreed, which is why it should be included in blinding along with names etc.

10.03.2026 14:41 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Interesting, can you say more?

10.03.2026 14:40 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

I believe they controlled for concerns like this.

10.03.2026 14:37 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Yeah that seems true to me. I do think we have an obligation to do the best we can though, especially where students are involved.

10.03.2026 14:36 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Totally agree and there should be strict rules against these misuses. Unfortunately the history of tech often involves having to have massively bad uses before we get basic regulation. The history of medical ethics comes to mind.

10.03.2026 14:35 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

I can totally respect that and I think I agree that can be a meaningful relationship as well. I do think that’s separable from reading something good, finding out an AI was involved and then hating the writing on principle, just as one example.

10.03.2026 14:29 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Yeah, I think the most reasonable concerns about AI are things like what happens if we don’t get a UBI along side widespread implementation.

10.03.2026 14:25 πŸ‘ 4 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 3 πŸ“Œ 0

See, this is fascinating to me. I seem to lack this particular disgust reaction, which is not unusual for me. For me, if the writing is good I don’t really care where it came from.

10.03.2026 14:23 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

What about if someone just used the AI to improve their own writing?

10.03.2026 14:16 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Honestly, given the state of AI under capitalism it would be weird to me if there wasn’t a ton of negativity towards it and people who use it. Most people’s experiences of it involve having it forced on them and it being terrible.

10.03.2026 14:09 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Whenever I talk about this I’m worried. I’m worried people will reflexively think worse of my writing or assume it’s all AI written. I’m developing consulting materials for this topic content creators right now, that’s another space where disclosure could seriously impact listenership.

10.03.2026 14:06 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0

I mean, the study I referenced suggests there are strong, sometimes unacknowledged biases against people who use AI even when they openly use it in appropriate ways. And it can hurt you in peer review. I haven’t seen data on career impact yet but I think it’s reasonable to be worried.

10.03.2026 14:06 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

For sure, just not a ton of outspoken ones in leftist spaces in my experience. The topic has become very politically polarized. And in academia it feels like a teacher vs admin debate where being a teacher and pro-AI can get you labeled a traitor.

10.03.2026 14:02 πŸ‘ 7 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

The author even explained to me the dark irony of having to declare AI usage when submitting a paper for peer review where they explicitly argue that AI disclosures bias editors.

10.03.2026 13:54 πŸ‘ 20 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

In my experience definitely the first one. But that’s just my experience. Especially in leftists spaces.

10.03.2026 13:52 πŸ‘ 8 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

I’ll prolly never get tenure so fuck it AI is revolutionary tech and the discourses around it is maximally cursed. I saw one study at SPSP that showed how students are viewed as lacking merit for using AI even when they are allowed to and declare using it. It’s reasonable to lie right now.

10.03.2026 13:45 πŸ‘ 62 πŸ” 6 πŸ’¬ 10 πŸ“Œ 2