Trending
Dr James Kite's Avatar

Dr James Kite

@jdkite

Academic with Prevention Research Collaboration at Uni of Sydney. Cyclist. Swans fan.

1,109
Followers
335
Following
417
Posts
17.02.2024
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Dr James Kite @jdkite

Preview
Robodebt was the great test of Australia’s accountability mechanisms – and they failed The final report into the Centrelink debt recovery process that wreaked havoc on the vulnerable is not the full-stop many wanted. It has not restored the trust that was so fundamentally broken * Follow our Australia news live blog for latest updates * Get our breaking news email, free app or daily news podcast The whistleblower’s message landed just before Christmas. It was 2016, now a distant memory. Continue reading...

Robodebt was the great test of Australia’s accountability mechanisms – and they failed

12.03.2026 07:17 👍 251 🔁 110 💬 11 📌 7

He doesn’t hold a hose, mate

11.03.2026 06:03 👍 3 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0

Geez. Really scraping the bottom of the barrel now

11.03.2026 02:52 👍 1 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0
Morrison one of the six referred to anti-corruption commission
Sarah Basford Canales
Sarah Basford Canales
Former prime minister, Scott Morrison, was one of the six people robodebt royal commissioner, Catherine Holmes, referred to the National Anti-Corruption Commission.

The final report, released this morning, found two officials – Mark Withnell and Serena Wilson – had engaged in serious corrupt conduct.

The report found the other four, however, did not. The other four names referred to the Nacc included Morrison, Kathryn Campbell, Annette Musolino and Catherine Halbert.

Morrison’s failure to realise the bureaucratic advice was misleading, the report found, was due to both the social services and human services departments failing to advise him and other ministers that new laws were needed.

Campbell was one of two named by the Australia Public Service Commission in 2024 after it found 12 public servants, including Campbell and former department head Renée Leon, breached the code of conduct 97 times during their involvement in the robodebt program.

Morrison one of the six referred to anti-corruption commission Sarah Basford Canales Sarah Basford Canales Former prime minister, Scott Morrison, was one of the six people robodebt royal commissioner, Catherine Holmes, referred to the National Anti-Corruption Commission. The final report, released this morning, found two officials – Mark Withnell and Serena Wilson – had engaged in serious corrupt conduct. The report found the other four, however, did not. The other four names referred to the Nacc included Morrison, Kathryn Campbell, Annette Musolino and Catherine Halbert. Morrison’s failure to realise the bureaucratic advice was misleading, the report found, was due to both the social services and human services departments failing to advise him and other ministers that new laws were needed. Campbell was one of two named by the Australia Public Service Commission in 2024 after it found 12 public servants, including Campbell and former department head Renée Leon, breached the code of conduct 97 times during their involvement in the robodebt program.

NACC's new report finds that two of the Robodebt Six engaged in serious corrupt conduct www.theguardian.com/australia-ne...

10.03.2026 23:42 👍 140 🔁 80 💬 10 📌 10
Preview
Up to $1.4 billion in medical research remains unused under government cap Researchers say securing funding has become increasingly tough, with many left with no choice but to spend a disproportionate amount of time applying for grants.

In 2014 Ross Gittins described the MRFF as an accounting trick (www.smh.com.au/business/med...) to hide deficits rather than fund more medical research. How right he was www.abc.net.au/news/2026-03...

08.03.2026 23:57 👍 29 🔁 20 💬 1 📌 0

They could make the system much more efficient by just releasing documents by default. I wonder if they will consider that option 🤔

05.03.2026 07:06 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

What a cool guy. Cool and normal

05.03.2026 07:03 👍 2 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 1

See how your trial goes. If it seems to be working, we could maybe try evaluating it across institutions.

05.03.2026 07:01 👍 2 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0

Nice idea. I like it. I’ll be interested to hear how it goes and what students think of it

05.03.2026 04:57 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

“The moment students reach for AI is a teaching moment, not a policing moment.” 💯

05.03.2026 04:57 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Great. We’ll get a lot more White Straight Men Being Violent Is The Best Actually movies. Probably generated by AI, too

27.02.2026 00:54 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Staggering chart. Hard to argue that the discount is in any way fair

25.02.2026 22:09 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

I have questions

25.02.2026 05:49 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

A thread about how fun it is to travel domestically in Australia. Yesterday evening I arrive at Melbourne airport only to find my flight to Sydney has been delayed by half an hour. Then another half an hour. And another …

23.02.2026 02:13 👍 4 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0
Post image

“It is past time for a re-evaluation of how universities engage with consultants and how they can be better employers and better providers of the education students need,” writes Alice Grundy, Managing Editor of Australia Institute Press.

Read the full piece on The Point: https://theaus.in/3Ow6ybB

23.02.2026 02:18 👍 44 🔁 14 💬 6 📌 1
Preview
Reducing inequality means taxing capital more — including inheritances Intergenerational inequality will only be dealt with by taxing the people that have the money, not by cutting the taxes of those who don't have it. #tax #federal #parliament #economic #trends #indicators #income #distribution #labour #market

Intergenerational inequality will only be dealt with by taxing the people that have the money, not by cutting the taxes of those who don't have it. #tax #federal #parliament #economic #trends #indicators #income #distribution #labour #market

22.02.2026 19:00 👍 2 🔁 4 💬 0 📌 1
Dear Colleagues & Peers,

My name is Deanna Zarrillo (she/they), and I am a PhD candidate at Drexel University’s College of Computing & Informatics. I am conducting dissertation research on the experiences of trans and gender diverse authors who have changed their name on academic publications and perspectives around digital identity more broadly. This work is aimed at assessing the community impact of post-publication name change policies from major publishers and enhancing policy around author privacy in the publication process.

As part of this work, I am recruiting eligible participants for a survey on this topic. If you are an academic and have changed your name in the past, whether on publications or not, please consider responding to this survey! As publishing policies evolve, your experiences can help shape more inclusive practices for current and future scholars.

You’re eligible if you:

You are an academic student or faculty member (current or previous) with a history of publications in academic journals 

You are transgender, gender diverse, or otherwise self-identify outside of the gender binary.

You have changed your name and have used, or have considered using, a post-publication name change policy or have changed your name on a publication in another way. 

Are fluent in English. 

What to Expect:

This survey includes questions about your experiences with post-publication name changes and utilizing publisher policies. Your participation in this survey is voluntary. You may refuse to take part in the research or to exit the survey at any time. Partial responses will not be retained. Should you volunteer as an interviewee*, further consent information will be provided via email prior to the scheduled interview in addition to a verbal consent agreement at the beginning of the interview. 

Your responses will provide vital information to help assess current policies, identify barriers and challenges, explore impact, develop recommendations for improvem…

Dear Colleagues & Peers, My name is Deanna Zarrillo (she/they), and I am a PhD candidate at Drexel University’s College of Computing & Informatics. I am conducting dissertation research on the experiences of trans and gender diverse authors who have changed their name on academic publications and perspectives around digital identity more broadly. This work is aimed at assessing the community impact of post-publication name change policies from major publishers and enhancing policy around author privacy in the publication process. As part of this work, I am recruiting eligible participants for a survey on this topic. If you are an academic and have changed your name in the past, whether on publications or not, please consider responding to this survey! As publishing policies evolve, your experiences can help shape more inclusive practices for current and future scholars. You’re eligible if you: You are an academic student or faculty member (current or previous) with a history of publications in academic journals You are transgender, gender diverse, or otherwise self-identify outside of the gender binary. You have changed your name and have used, or have considered using, a post-publication name change policy or have changed your name on a publication in another way. Are fluent in English. What to Expect: This survey includes questions about your experiences with post-publication name changes and utilizing publisher policies. Your participation in this survey is voluntary. You may refuse to take part in the research or to exit the survey at any time. Partial responses will not be retained. Should you volunteer as an interviewee*, further consent information will be provided via email prior to the scheduled interview in addition to a verbal consent agreement at the beginning of the interview. Your responses will provide vital information to help assess current policies, identify barriers and challenges, explore impact, develop recommendations for improvem…

please RT! if you've ever contacted a journal or publisher to have your name changed on a publication, a friend and colleague of mine wants to hear about your experience! drexel.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_...

#phdchat #academicchatter

21.02.2026 21:47 👍 23 🔁 25 💬 1 📌 1

Wrong place to start. You need to stop the sale of the things in the first place. Target the manufacturers and the retailers, not the kids. And yes, I’m aware many come from overseas, but just because it is hard, doesn’t mean we shouldn’t do it

20.02.2026 04:11 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

“The self-evident truths of public health remind us… of the basics; that ill health and inequity in health, are, via poverty, deprivation, or low-income, structurally determined, and that this is where our efforts must aim, ultimately”

20.02.2026 04:08 👍 11 🔁 8 💬 0 📌 0

I wonder if those 2 things are related 🤔

19.02.2026 21:18 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Who exercises in jeans?!

18.02.2026 03:29 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
‘The trend is irreversible’: has Romania shattered the link between economic growth and high emissions? Emissions have plunged 75% since communist times in the birthplace of big oil – but for some the transition has been brutal

Romania has decoupled economic growth from pollution faster than anywhere else in EU. Its net greenhouse gas emissions intensity fell 88% between 1990 & 2023, so each euro’s worth of economic activity heats planet 10 times less. Emissions have plunged by 75%. www.theguardian.com/environment/...

17.02.2026 08:53 👍 6237 🔁 1915 💬 107 📌 95

Not a good look

17.02.2026 08:47 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

All that will do will be that people don’t declare AI use. I don’t think that is better than the current situation

16.02.2026 21:39 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

I do love to open the pantry even when I know what’s in there

16.02.2026 03:52 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

And donkey?

13.02.2026 22:03 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

The liberal party never ceases to amaze me with who they pick as leader. Taylor gives off strong Dutton/Morrison/Abbott vibes - ie talks a big game but doesn’t bother with the details. That might work as an opposition leader for a time but you’ll fall flat on your face as PM

12.02.2026 22:47 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

For me, it’s probably more. I’ve had songs I’ve really liked and sung along with without ever knowing what they’re about

11.02.2026 10:43 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
It appears you no longer have the right to protest | First Dog on the Moon Police charged at people who could not flee due to being kettled. As always police say that is not what happened

www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...

11.02.2026 09:45 👍 0 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0
Infographic titled "Why Speed Matters" with three sections:

**Top:** Two statistics side by side. Left: "75% — Drivers yield 75% of the time when traveling 20 MPH." Right: "17% — Drivers yield only 17% of the time when traveling 37 MPH."

**Middle:** Two street-view illustrations comparing driver field of vision. Left: Wide, clear field of vision at 15 MPH. Right: Severely narrowed tunnel-like field of vision at 30 to 40 MPH.

**Bottom:** Three panels showing pedestrian survival rates when hit by a vehicle. At 20 MPH: 9 out of 10 pedestrians survive. At 30 MPH: 5 out of 10 pedestrians survive. At 40 MPH: Only 1 out of 10 pedestrians survives.

Graphic by Seattle DOT.

Infographic titled "Why Speed Matters" with three sections: **Top:** Two statistics side by side. Left: "75% — Drivers yield 75% of the time when traveling 20 MPH." Right: "17% — Drivers yield only 17% of the time when traveling 37 MPH." **Middle:** Two street-view illustrations comparing driver field of vision. Left: Wide, clear field of vision at 15 MPH. Right: Severely narrowed tunnel-like field of vision at 30 to 40 MPH. **Bottom:** Three panels showing pedestrian survival rates when hit by a vehicle. At 20 MPH: 9 out of 10 pedestrians survive. At 30 MPH: 5 out of 10 pedestrians survive. At 40 MPH: Only 1 out of 10 pedestrians survives. Graphic by Seattle DOT.

Short reminder:
Vision Zero is a great goal to work on.
Day by day.
Just by putting people over cars.

10.02.2026 18:31 👍 67 🔁 21 💬 0 📌 6