this is bad and violates consent but also how do you flirt with this geriatric turd on your face?
11.02.2026 01:40
👍 0
🔁 1
💬 1
📌 0
this is bad and violates consent but also how do you flirt with this geriatric turd on your face?
MATCHMAKING For PSYCHOPATHS a hovel TASHA CORYELL AUTHOR OF LOVE LETTERS TO A SERIAL KILLER
Competition for resources
“you’re kind of a loser if you’re not in the Epstein files” is an incredibly capitalist take
Annie Rauwerda, creator of Depths of #Wikipedia, lives for the internet’s weirdest footnotes.
Case in point: the long-gone Garfield the cat “G-Mail,” a defunct web curiosity now surviving only on the #WaybackMachine. 🙀📬
Read more 👉 blog.archive.org/2026/02/05/d...
@depthsofwikipedia.bsky.social
* This is a UI dependency so it bloats our bundle by several megabytes
* It's ours. Maintained by another team in the organisation where I work
* Team does not respond to issues I open
* Source repo is private, can't even view the code let alone open a PR
mr cat being a dork even though I fed him 3 times today
mr cat has been fed 3 times
Mass market paperbacks that were unsold within 90 or 120 days had their covers stripped (as proof of destruction) then were pulped. Up to 50% of the print run would be destroyed this way. Horribly wasteful: we're MUCH better off with ebooks as the cheap/disposable reading format of choice.
TFW you check a person of notoriety you are somewhat fond of and they're NOT in the epstein library
It is almost certainly the case that the evils of the first Trump administration are borne of the failures of political and legal accountability for the GWB administration and the evils of the second are borne of the failure to prosecute what happened during the first.
Personally I believe that when your leaders flagrantly defy the Constitution and law Strong Accountability Through Due Process is needed to ensure that they stop and a message is sent to future leaders to not consider the same path
I've just seen the word "unalive" used earnestly in a non-fiction book that is specifically written to deconstruct harmful tropes built in to modern romance novels.
Girl you explicitly talked about sexual violence not 20 pages ago what the fuck do you MEAN "unalive"?!?!?!?
with all due respect it is not lib shit, it is fed psyop or outright idiocy, and given circumstances one would be remiss to treat it as anything other than fed op
I hate my muse.
(Muse just visited my crapsack space empire with degenerate nobles and said, "*what if* fox hunting with hounds, only Reynard is a GM histocompatible vulpine with thumbs and the brain of a condemned felon grafted on, to make the hunt more exciting for the nobs? TALLY HO!" Aagh.)
There's dirt on literally everyone of note.
This is part of the strategy, btw - have your fingers in EVERY pie, so people dont know which ones are fully corrupt.
bsky.app/profile/chad...
„Taken together, Bach’s communications with Epstein reveal an entire architecture of thought increasingly common among Edge participants: biological hierarchy; racial destiny; gender determinism; genetic optimisation; population culling; fascism as efficiency.“
I think if you were to write a book about the scientific and academic scene that Epstein cultivated (and which also sought to cultivate him!) this is the throughline
I think a lot of westie "left direct action opsec" culture is at its core superstitious, a magical cargo cult. Opsec (comsec, whatever) for them is not a mechanistic, rational set of procedures to shape interactions with adversary in a desirable way, but rituals, "rites of holy thegrugg thewise"
in conclusion, american politics is a land of contrasts
Who here has ever seen something genuinely weird, that they sincerely couldn't explain - but wish they could?
Tell us about it!
Oh wow I think this is the first non hostile engagement ive got on here
Is this thing still going?
well, I'm running for mimi/alice/a few others rn, so talk it over w them if you all think the invite would be net positive :)
like, it's not strange at *all* if it's performative.
or performative.
There is NO SUCH THING as an apolitical social media platform post-2016.
Pick a side, or lose.
You prob want to weigh likes w an exponential decay, rather than just adding them all up then dividing.
Suggestion:
We create one "leap period" of 23,274,000,015.21336 seconds.
Once this "runs out", we end our civilization.
It's a really simple litmus test:
Have you ever once, in the entire history of this man's posts, ever seen him say anything to ANYONE that was remotely "in good faith"?
