Mr. Buick's Avatar

Mr. Buick

@mrbuick

Probably browsing BaT MotorWeek Evangelist Pennsylvania Nationalist Catholic Worker Movement Respecter AACA, SCCA, & BCA Member “So come drive with us!”

1,815
Followers
2,506
Following
29,302
Posts
07.11.2024
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Mr. Buick @mrbuick

Because the Republican Party is an appendage of the Kremlin

10.03.2026 14:20 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Post image

The headline that highlights the absurd form of American fascism we now live with:

10.03.2026 10:04 👍 436 🔁 109 💬 7 📌 18
10.03.2026 13:11 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Video thumbnail

Czechia's Ondřej Satoria, who is a full-time electrician, leaves his final career game to a standing ovation after throwing 4.2 shutout innings against Japan!

10.03.2026 11:28 👍 180 🔁 44 💬 5 📌 20

Calling Cormac McCarthy’s authorial style a “mistake” that AI no longer makes is so funny

10.03.2026 11:12 👍 521 🔁 125 💬 25 📌 35

whenever asian markets are in turmoil this is all I can think of

09.03.2026 04:05 👍 33 🔁 9 💬 2 📌 0
@JDfromscrubslol
Had a dream there was an emoji like 💯 except it was only 60. Some post said "popeyes fries be tasting so good (60)" and I laughed so hard I woke myself up

@JDfromscrubslol Had a dream there was an emoji like 💯 except it was only 60. Some post said "popeyes fries be tasting so good (60)" and I laughed so hard I woke myself up

Thinking about the 60 emoji again

09.03.2026 23:58 👍 4094 🔁 756 💬 4 📌 0
09.03.2026 20:22 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

I know they're not comparable really, but you can get a Lucid Air Sapphire with double the horsepower for approximately the same amount of money

09.03.2026 20:18 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Preview
1932 Ford Model B 1932 Ford Model B Roadster For consignment, a spectacular 1932 Ford Model B Roadster with some modern modifications that make it enjoyable to drive and...

The only Ford going for over $100k that I'm interested in

09.03.2026 20:15 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Who buys this. What is the demo. Why would anyone with $170k to burn not just choose a Ferrari or special edition 911

09.03.2026 20:13 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0

You could take that money, buy some vacant land out in the sticks, buy about twenty odd NA Miatas, create and open a track, and you'd STILL have tens of thousands left over

09.03.2026 20:12 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

$170k for a Mustang.

A MUSTANG.

A. FORD. MUSTANG.

09.03.2026 20:11 👍 2 🔁 1 💬 3 📌 0

The Dark Horse is the quintessential sports car of 2026: heavier than a military flotilla, with the turning radius of the International Space Station, the steering feel of a week-old dead body, but it's RWD with a manual and a V8 so we're not allowed to complain

09.03.2026 20:10 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 3 📌 0

It's rent seeking all the way down, I fear

09.03.2026 20:07 👍 6 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

A years-long procession of trials and hangings is going to be necessary not only for justice, but to remind the people why all these painful reforms are necessary.

09.03.2026 14:45 👍 267 🔁 24 💬 6 📌 2

The existence of color is predicated both on a physical definition (length of the lightwave) and an observational definition (the relative position of the observer); the existence of art follows a similar pattern

09.03.2026 20:03 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Like color, artistic meaning isn't inherent to it's metaphysical nature. Color, after all, is just the absorption and kickback of lightwaves on objects that we're able to observe with our eyes

09.03.2026 20:02 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

If Emily Dickinson's poetry wasn't found by her sister on her desk, you could make the argument that she possessed sole authority over their meaning, as they're essentially just diary entries. Once it was compiled and published, though, that authority disappears

09.03.2026 19:57 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

You can never separate the art from the artist; but the artist aquieseces agency over the *meaning* of the art the moment it is rendered for public consumption

09.03.2026 19:54 👍 8 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

What you don't think the latifundia owners are on the up-and-up or something

09.03.2026 19:52 👍 6 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Won't someone think of the rent seekers that can only exist when they're perpetually subsidized by tax monies taken from places that actually produce GDP

09.03.2026 19:51 👍 10 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
a man in a suit and tie is standing in front of a sign that says i 'm here to tell you right now . ALT: a man in a suit and tie is standing in front of a sign that says i 'm here to tell you right now .

"Oh no but what about the rural petit-bourgeoisie rent seekers?"

09.03.2026 19:48 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
09.03.2026 19:46 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

This is correct insofar that both fascists and anarchists are anti-Hobbesians

14.12.2024 23:43 👍 5 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0

They believe in the antecedent of Hobbes’ Leviathan - that the state of nature is a ruthlessness of all against all - but don’t believe in the remedy of the state as such, even if the remedies inexorably lead to some kind of state formation

14.12.2024 23:47 👍 3 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 1

Fascists see the state not as conveying security upon a populous but as dispensing violence on them, there is no sense of obligation to the social contract; it’s a contract between the individual and the personalism of the Leader, with the former acting as slave to the latter

14.12.2024 23:48 👍 4 🔁 1 💬 2 📌 0

Anarchists see the state similarly, in that it’s merely an apparatus for dispensing violence, not protecting it; they see the only valid contracts to be immediately relational

14.12.2024 23:49 👍 4 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0

Both fail to understand that all of the arrangements they believe to be deconstructions of the state are just reformulations of it.

You can never not have a state as a unit of political economy, precisely because it’s an inexorable result of humans living socially

14.12.2024 23:50 👍 4 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 1

We can walk and chew gum at the same time, people!

09.03.2026 19:42 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0