open.substack.com/pub/acrowsne...
So it turns out my first ever substack post is about fashion, not quite the menswear guy for trans women but it's a start
open.substack.com/pub/acrowsne...
So it turns out my first ever substack post is about fashion, not quite the menswear guy for trans women but it's a start
This reminds me, my favorite vegan dish I've had lately
littleferrarokitchen.com/turkish-lent...
I haven't tried boiling potatoes with mint, it seems like a great idea
Can't believe it took me. At least a year? To consider that Google might have developed a convenient way to transfer files directly from my laptop to my phone and vice versa
I am quite skeptical of this claim. I am almost certainly 90th+ percentile for "general knowledge of geopolitics" and I do not have a clear understanding of what exactly is meant by "The Russian federation is an oligarchy"
Sleep deprivation, amphetamines, and academia. The psychosis special!
Why is this a question of concern to the Indian defence review
One of the most annoying things about stimulant crash is feeling like I have all these emotions I want to deal with. But also knowing that I'm only experiencing them because of the drug, or lack thereof, so it's a little pointless?
This is why I have a certain skepticism of therapy
The lines
"All we may ask of you we have; the rest
Is not for publication, will not be heard" have echoed in my head ever since the first time I read this and I'm not sure why
I've read a fair amount of poetry lately, and yet this one has stuck with me more than any other. Not sure why
I am resentful of the fact that I have *chosen* to make myself an ugly woman and if I want to be anything else it will be many £££'s
I had a dream where
I was being shown an invention
That was a cheap mechanism for setting priors in mechanical devices
And this was important because setting priors in manufacturing was an incredibly expensive thing which prevented Yugoslavia from being able to perform advanced manufacturing
This is perhaps a good demonstration of the way that X and Bsky make smart people say stupid things. No ones principles are separate from the people they imagine themselves to be. The charitable and uncharitable reads aren't very different, but people mostly care about making biting comments.
"It is absurd to claim that Laith Ashley is βreally femaleβ or βreally male.β Laith Ashleyβlike other transsexuals and many detransitioned peopleβhas an iatrogenic intersex condition"
This is the only reasonable belief vis a vis trans people's sex. You can't believe anything else in good faith.
thingofthings.substack.com/p/in-defense...
Ozy is one of few sane people on this topic
I am currently in the position where it is many orders of magnitude easier to get an interview for a PhD at Cambridge than it is to get an interview for a research assistant job. I don't quite know what is going on
What biology research are you most excited about right now?
Posting this without further context
Lmao
And this much I would agree makes it incoherent. However I stand by the claim that the arguments are perfectly *clear*
That's fair I probably agree with you on this point.
I agree with you for the most part that right wingers who claim not to want desegregation in fact do, but I think there is a significant contingent who don't feel strongly about segregation and who just want to be able to say racist things in public. I think these are real people
Huh? I am confused. He thinks that segregation is one of the biggest risks associated with breaking taboos about racism, this does not necessarily mean that the people who want to break those taboos want segregation. (I think many of them fairly sincerely don't, though even more do)
Granted, however neither does "Incoherent" just mean that the premises are *wrong*, it usually means they are deeply philosophically confused. I do not think that applies here, but more to the point a number of people seemed to genuinely be failing to follow the argument!
bsky.app/profile/imma...
This is complete nonsense but you said that the link being made was "untrue"
If I believe you're a bunch of idiot liars why would i not be extremely skeptical of factual claims you're making? As I said I'm only in a position to debate the text, and nothing you've said has convinced me that "Incoherent" is a reasonable description of it
Except that's not actually how you're using that!
I am in no position to debate factual claims. I trust neither you nor Matt Y to be substantively correct about any of this, I was just baffled by the implication that the claim that what was being said was unclear
But being someone who runs in mostly stem circles yes "Incoherent" usually refers to a claim where the argument doesn't follow from the premises, if the premises are false then it's just a bad piece of research