In my reading, both of these papers are primarily critical of CLPMs but not of RI CLPMs, or am I missing something here?
In my reading, both of these papers are primarily critical of CLPMs but not of RI CLPMs, or am I missing something here?
π’ New in HCR by @janadreston.bsky.social and @andreasnanz.bsky.social:
Both intentional search and accidental exposure to election info on social media boost political knowledgeβbut donβt improve vote-choice alignment. Intentional seekers just feel more confident.
Read: doi.org/10.1093/hcr/...
π Top Student-Led Paper
π @janadreston.bsky.social & @andreasnanz.bsky.social
π Incidental Exposure in a Mock Election Setting on Social Media: Effects on Subjective and Objective Political Knowledge and Aligned Voting
Hmm, not sure whether I agree...π€ to get any structured data (not only but, e.g., rectangular data) out of a PDF, I typically need more information (e.g., what is the separator between values) than I need to parse a standard excel. PDFs are not really designed for data storage, imho.
Read-only for raw data is great advice. Also, an intuitive structure for subdirectories is important. But raw data as *.pdf seems a bit... impractical? Are reviewers and (future) readers then supposed to parse your data from a PDF? This sounds a bit error-prone to me (or I don't get it)
New blog post! In which I explain the issue with mediation analysis and sketch out one way to deal with the underlying causal inference problem -- in just a bit over 1,000 words!
If you have never found the time to read up on this, now is your chance.
www.the100.ci/2025/03/20/r...
ONLINE FIRST! This article by @andreasnanz.bsky.social and colleagues investigate how crucial political predispositions as well as how perceptions of content characteristics predict the two levels of incidental exposure to #news. Available with OPEN ACCESS.
www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
#OutNow in #iCS
Nanz and Matthes examine how incidental exposure to political information on social media impacts usersβ political knowledge and sense of political efficacy.
doi.org/10.1080/1369...
New paper on incidental exposure (IE) w. @rutakaskeleviciute.bsky.social, Stubenvoll, and Matthes in @digitaljournalism.bsky.socialπ We investigated how pol. predispositions (interest and news avoidance) as well as perceptions of content relate to first- and second-level IE. doi.org/10.1080/2167...
New blog post on #MediationAnalysis (MA), which is widely misunderstood and overused in #CommunicationResearch and #Psychology.
I made mistakes using MA myself, and no one should be blamed. But it's important to discuss flaws, esp. as MA has become so popular.
www.raffaelheiss.com/post/mediation
New paper on incidental exposure (IE) in @icsjournal.bsky.social π We investigated how first- (scanning of IE content) and second-level IE (thorough processing) relate to internal pol. efficacy and pol. surveillance knowledge (w. a 3W survey during 2021 GER election π³οΈ). doi.org/10.1080/1369...
π’ Publication π’
JΓΆrg Matthes, @alonzoizner.bsky.social, @andreasnanz.bsky.social, @1864.bsky.social, @yannistheocharis.bsky.social, & Selina Noetzel report findings from a 17-country survey about incidental pol news exposure & both online and offline pol participation.
ππΌ doi.org/10.1080/2167...
ONLINE FIRST & OPEN ACCESS! This study by JΓΆrg Matthes,
@alonzoizner.bsky.social, @andreasnanz.bsky.social et al. examines incidental political news exposure, revealing how its effects on participation depend on engagement levels and the quality of democracy.
www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....