@pgmol-watch.bsky.social
@thepeoplegeek
People Geek in the business and sports world. Evidence based HR & sports coach practitioner. Using 4E cognitive & behavioural science to inform building, managing & retaining high performing teams. Particular interest in all things non-linear & pedagogical
Stand Larsen looking in this game. Pressing, flicking on balls and being a nuisance for the CBs. #cpfc
Watching this season, this is what we are missing. We look to beholden to a rigid system against any type of block.
This @officialcpfc.bsky.social team feel like the least South London styled team. No flair, no creativity, just patterns of play that are too easily defendable. FIFA96 was less predictable than the team today.
Lessons need to be learned.
Congratulations to Macclesfield! π
How does his out of possession game look?
Not the changes anyone expected
Is that last 3 minutes major enough?
In transformation or change management programmes, what do we mean by efficiency? Could we be chasing the wrong pot of gold at an illusionary rainbow?
open.substack.com/pub/davehodg...
I've written about what 19th century astronomy teaches us about 21st century people management, why prediction has inherent limits in complex systems and what we can do about
The lessons from physics suggest we might need to fundamentally rethink how we approach behavioral change in organisations.
Workplace behaviour emerges from the interaction of three components: Someone (the person), Somewhere (the environment), and Something (the task). When these three elements interact, the system becomes complex in ways that resist traditional cause-and-effect thinking.
Tiny changes in starting conditions lead to completely different outcomes over time.
What does this have to do with people management?
In the 1890s, Henri PoincarΓ© proved that when three celestial bodies are gravitationally attracted to each other, their motion becomes fundamentally unpredictable. Not because we lack data or computing power, but because three-body problems inherently resist prediction.
This story from my recruitment days was jogged whilst reading Alicia Juarrero βContext Changes Everythingβ. Her introduction to 19th century physics has profound implications for how we approach workplace behaviour.
The only change? Her office was now next to the executive floor instead of embedded within her team.
Six months later, she was struggling. Not dramatically failing, just... different. Less innovative, more cautious, increasingly frustrated.
Sarah was the perfect candidate. Brilliant analytical mind, stellar track record, glowing references. She'd thrived in similar roles at two previous companiesβ¦β¦
The UEL final has become the PL relegation playoffβ¦
The Europa League final has effectively turned into a Premier League relegation playoff?
It makes no logical sense how a body part that cannot be scored with, that has no bearing on the goal gives him an advantage?
I appreciate questioning the cognitive science behind Pixarβs Inside Out may not make me popular.
But what if the major cognitive science assumption the film makes is wrong?
open.substack.com/pub/davehodg...
Stretch goals. Are they consistently stretched too far?
open.substack.com/pub/davehodg...
Nice to hear Matt. Keep up the physio and over recover as you get back the mileage. I killed my LCL not willing to pull out of Brighton Marathon.
What is the science behind hunches?
#hr #cognitivescience #neuroscience
open.substack.com/pub/davehodg...
Is Nketiah the right profile (assuming heβs the successor)? Much of JPs success is his physicality in penetrating space whilst holding off defenders? Or can we adapt to Nketiahβs strengths?
Will take a look at Hayden Hackneyβ¦.
All I can think is succession planning for JP and Wharton. Why canβt I just enjoy todayβ¦.?
Thanks Steve!
IRL Hungry Hippoβs?