Potentially doi.org/10.1177/0962... ? Otherwise cc @margaritamb.bsky.social , who has very readable papers on DAGs/missing data
Potentially doi.org/10.1177/0962... ? Otherwise cc @margaritamb.bsky.social , who has very readable papers on DAGs/missing data
New post, on how AI is coming for open source software: kucharski.substack.com/p/will-your-...
cc @kristinsainani.bsky.social and @reginanuzzo.bsky.social , who discuss the statistical limitations of this preprint on their podcast: www.normalcurves.com/your-brain-o...
@lshtm.bsky.social will be running a 3-day online short course on using multiple imputation to handle missing data on 23-25th June 2026. Teaching staff include James Carpenter, Ruth Keogh, ClΓ©mence Leyrat, and myself. Further details about the course at www.lshtm.ac.uk/study/course...
Modern-Day Oracles or Bullshit Machines?
Jevin West (@jevinwest.bsky.social) and I have spent the last eight months developing the course on large language models (LLMs) that we think every college freshman needs to take.
thebullshitmachines.com
A "methods primer" article in the journal "BMJ Medicine", titled "Factors associated with: problems of using exploratory multivariable regression to identify causal risk factors"
We wrote an article explaining why you shouldn't put several variables into a regression model and report which are statistically significant - even as exploratory research. bmjmedicine.bmj.com/content/4/1/.... How did we do?
Belgian AI scientists are advocating *against* the use of AI in academia. βIf independent thinking is no longer encouraged at university, where would it?β apache.be/2025/10/24/b...
Multiple Imputation of Missing Covariates When Using the FineβGray Model. Edouard F. Bonneville, Jan Beyersmann, Ruth H. Keogh, Jonathan W. Bartlett, Tim P. Morris, Nicola Polverelli, Liesbeth C. de Wreede, Hein Putter. Statistics in Medicine. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/...
Yep as long as you thought to store your simulation results nicely in a tidy / long format it makes things very easy π
Looks nice! Suggestion: with the {targets} approach you can have a quarto file at the end of the pipeline to report your results, using e.g. @ellessenne.bsky.social 's excellent {rsimsum} (ellessenne.github.io/rsimsum/) package for performance measures + making nice plots
Hazards Constitute Key Quantities for Analyzing, Interpreting and Understanding Time-to-Event Data. Jan Beyersmann, Claudia Schmoor, Martin Schumacher. Biometrical Journal. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/...
sorry to miss ACIC; enjoy the weird lasagna pizza nerds
A common sentiment is βI canβt share my code because itβs messy and there might be errorsβ
But if itβs that untrustworthy, why are you publishing the results it generates?
Tariffs xkcd.com/3073
Alas I reviewed one of these recently.. at least it provided an all-timer along the lines of "A scoping review on how measurement error is handled (=inclusion in review if there was measurement error + a correction method used) showed that over x% of papers suffered from measurement error" π₯
This piece from @tressiemcphd.bsky.social starts with a bang and just gets better and better. Gift link.
Interesting read, thanks! Would you have any insights as to why methodological journals do not yet make the code sharing mandatory? Quite frustrating as a reviewer..
Here's hoping "(no wizard required)" becomes the new ": a tutorial"
.. at least compared to the matching step before G-computation in each imputed dataset, which does seem to affect the final estimates π
Really nice, thanks! While playing around with the code locally, it was interesting (albeit a bit depressing as a missing data enthusiast) how little the imputation approach seemed to matter e.g. unstratified by exposure/random forests/compatible with the model w/ all exposure x confounder terms..
'Estimating hypothetical estimands with causal inference and missing data estimators in a diabetes trial case study', led by Camila Olarte Parra, with Rhian Daniel and David Wright, now available open access in Biometrics: doi.org/10.1093/biom...
New work in preprint!
"Performance evaluation of predictive AI models to support medical decisions: Overview and guidance".
Under the wings of the STRATOS initiative.
But @maartenvsmeden.bsky.social said it better already π
arxiv.org/abs/2412.10288
{ggeffects} version 2.0.0 is out now! Read more about this #rstats package at strengejacke.github.io/ggeffects
What does {ggeffects} do? The π¦ helps you to understand (complex) models and results by calculating and plotting *estimated marginal means* or more generally, *adjusted predictions*. π§΅
Hello everyone! I teach a class for graduate students on methods for reproducible research. π§ π’
I would interested to hear about the barriers you face in implementing reproducible practices in your research (e.g., version control, code review, reproducible documents).
My fav starter packs so far, a thread:
stats: go.bsky.app/Ki7PjpS
stats: go.bsky.app/7TBN5rX
causal inference: go.bsky.app/FdemGAZ
package devs: go.bsky.app/N1569Qh
data peeps: go.bsky.app/8TdEfdK
medical stats: go.bsky.app/ArqEz36
bioinformatics: go.bsky.app/Ha64Gmv
r-ladies: go.bsky.app/Vgxwa2F
Goose chase meme. Top Panel: Suspicious goose asks "biased relative to what?" Bottom Panel: Goose is chasing a man, yelling "Biased relative to what?"
When a study talks about various things that could bias estimates but never explicitly addresses the analysis goal in the first place