If you think Hasan is a valid twitch streamer than leave. We hate you.
04.07.2025 23:15
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
If you think Hasan is a valid twitch streamer than leave. We hate you.
We get it. It's ok when your friends in the union work during a "strike". Totally not nepotism. It's not crossing the line when your friends do it.
So, Corina?
Jacob did nothing wrong.
We'll see.
We can keep revisiting this topic but I'd rather not. The strike will fail. Everyone is already getting replaced. If they keep it up then all that's going to happen is SAG will get blacklisted from every Hoyo project. Maybe even other gacha games.
Well, since a majority of workers across all languages are working still... They do have collective bargaining power. They used it to say they don't want SAG.
I take them by a case by case basis like any sane person does.
I just said it. Refusal to work. In the precious post. We aren't gonna go in circles. SAG says Hoyo isnt apart of it. Only SAG people are doing it. The non-SAG people don't care. This will continue to fail.
It can be a solution sometimes. Sure. I don't doubt that. But if a majority don't go along with it... They aren't scabs. The people striking are the ones wrong. Just saying you are striking doesn't mean it's valuable, reasonable, or right.
You really need to quit hastily blocking people just for a reasonable disagreement.
You really need to quit hastily blocking people just for a reasonable disagreement.
And I answered it. Read all of it instead of skimming.
Sure. That's one way to do it. Work refusal works sometimes. But... What if most of the workers there disagree with your work refusal?
James Earl Jones was not part of SAG when he chose what to do with his voice.
I firmly disagree. I think only you own your voice. If you die not agreeing to AI, no AI. Even if SAG wants it with their program. If you say yes, it's up to you where and how your own voice is used.
Is that so wrong of a concept?
Sometimes yes. Especially the ones who aren't Fi-core. They shouldn't have been there in the first place.
Ok. So if you join the union your voice isn't yours. It's SAGs. That's what that says.
And I get it. From your side, he's dead and they aren't. But... It's still his voice. Not SAGs. I firmly believe no corporation should have rights over your voice. Only you and what you choose with it.
Did the actor himself agree to it, sign to it, had family agree to it? What choice should you have on how someone uses their own voice? Who owns your voice but you?
Fine. If you see it that way. The union doesn't support that action and there's no protection for doing it. They'll just get replaced.
You didn't debunk my points though. We disagree. It is what it is. But I see what the union is doing in my opinion. "Its about AI". Yet they sneak in AI programs. It's about ethics. But they fight an ethical use. It's about the principle. But people break the work rule on non-union all the time.
Its not wrong. But Hoyo isn't a strikable target. Even SAG said so. So any recast isn't scabbing. Its just a consequence of not going to work. And Hoyo cared enough to wait over a year before they started.
Not all of them are Fi-Core. You and I both know that.
Side note. Not mad. I hate autocorrect as well.
Just say you think SAG should control it all. I'd respect your more for being honest.
Bing bing bing. It's a non-union shop. The only people not working are union. There's rules against union works working non-union jobs. And they aren't apart of the strike. But yet... Somehow are. Even SAG has said they aren't. So the union actors are forcing it. So yes. That is what I am saying.
Oh really? Which part. Let me spell it out for you.
