Best one? "That was a misspoke."
π€£π€£π€£π€£
When does he get his π€‘ππ
@eieino
45/47 ran to avoid prison, then gamed the system to get richer by implementing Uniformity, Inequity, and Exclusion (UIE). He doesn't care who suffers, who dies, or who wishes he wouldn't commit crimes against humanity. I am antifa. 86 47
Best one? "That was a misspoke."
π€£π€£π€£π€£
When does he get his π€‘ππ
www.americanbar.org/groups/profe...
Article 8 (2) (b) (xii) War crime of denying quarter Elements 1. The perpetrator declared or ordered that there shall be no survivors. 2. Such declaration or order was given in order to threaten an adversary or to conduct hostilities on the basis that there shall be no survivors. 3. The perpetrator was in a position of effective command or control over the subordinate forces to which the declaration or order was directed. 4. The conduct took place in the context of and was associated with an international armed conflict. 5. The perpetrator was aware of factual circumstances that established the existence of an armed conflict.
And the elements of the war crime of denial of quarter from the Rome Statute which the USG regarded to be generally consistent with customary international law and which would likely inform interpretation of the offense under the US War Crimes Act.
Every war involves killing. Any war means. death, and pain, and grief. For centuries the civilized nations of the world have attempted to reduce the death and suffering by observing the laws and usages of war. By international conventions and agreements, such as the Hague and Geneva Conventions, and by general custom, certain practices are internationally regarded as cruel, inhumane, and criminal. Such barbarities include the killing of s,urrendered belligerents, the refusal of quarter, and torture or other ill-treatment of belligerents or inhabitants of occupied countries. Such acts are crimes and, if they result in death, are murders.
From the "High Command Case" at Nuremberg:
And as a fun related legal fact, the failure of a commander to punish war crimes by his subordinates is also a war crime under the doctrine of command responsibility.
Published by the Naval War College in 2021:
digital-commons.usnwc.edu/ils/vol97/is...
"Declaring that no quarter will be given" is specifically prohibited by Art 23 of the Annex to the Hague Convention IV, which means it is a war crime under US domestic law by virtue of the War Crimes Act (18 U.S. Code Β§ 2441).
(1) The accused declared, ordered, or otherwise indicated that there shall be no survivors or surrender accepted; (2) The accused thereby intended to threaten an adversary or to conduct hostilities such that there would be no survivors or surrender accepted; (3) It was foreseeable that circumstances would be such that a practicable and reasonable ability to accept surrender would exist; (4) The accused was in a position of effective command or control over the subordinate forces to which the declaration or order was directed; and (5) The conduct took place in the context of and was associated with hostilities.
β Former USG war crimes lawyer here.
Apropos of SecDef's remarks this morning:
Denial of quarterβeven the declaration of no quarterβis a war crime.
And recognized as such by the US Government.
From DoD's Manual for Military Commissions.
Cadet Bone Spurs reporting for duty!
Lol...Trump is a convicted felon.
Isn't it interesting that they deny climate change but want to grab Greenland because the ice is melting.
"...every page."
Speaking of rapists.
Speaking of gender affirming care.
"Our" ability says a guy who would soil his trousers if he ever faced any real threat.
Fuck these assholes.
bsky.app/profile/diew...
Fuck no...he cannot. How would Sharia be "imposed" anyway? It's all just giving credence to bigotry.
Starr County was the lowest income county in Texas won by Trump and is nearly 98% Hispanic or Latino.
And 20 seconds for number 1.
Lying to Congress is a crime.