I moved from remarkable to supernote and feel similarly, supernote feels waaaay more lovingly considered
I moved from remarkable to supernote and feel similarly, supernote feels waaaay more lovingly considered
βSo I wanted to steel man the case for detention centersβ - despicable rubbish
Klein and Thompson at their worst just love this twitter fash driven middlebrow intellectual exploration and both their publications seem to think it is the height of sophistication
canβt believe your uncle works at the box making factory
fresh βim a new deal democratβ logo
unfathomable levels of gender in this quote
technocrats trying to do focus group populism are totally misreading the moment and will 100% fail to defeat the rising white identity politics
I've written a couple of papers on how Core(FinSet) being the coproduct of all the symmetric groups helps us understand representations of symmetric groups, and how those are related to symmetric functions.
Unfortunately the first has an unnecessarily scary title.
arxiv.org/abs/2106.00190
W
If it is a formal theorem prover like lean then you only need to check the definitions are correct and none of the proofs use βsorryβ (which the system will tell you you)
person who couldn't name a single film, university, television network in iran: do you know anything about iranian society???
theyβre corner shops that sell a breakfast bap
most people donβt finish Les Mis
I have the same thought about academics who get into the culture war, which clearly is an easier path to βbeing a public intellectualβ than having something new and profound to say
describing this as basic and brave new algebra as the bimboification of mathematics
I love this goofy little nothing arg about binary ops is like βoh maybe this tells us something fundamental about the delooping of a higher monoidal categoryβ
semi interesting that eckmannβhilton has a kind of βco-weakeningβ thing going on where it is easier to conclude that both operations are equal and commutative, than to conclude just one of those facts
originally tried doing this with MulOneClass (which is the same concept as MagmaWithIdentity) but found it impossible even passing typeclass args explicitly as the typeclass inference constantly kicks in and gets confused as it tries to look up instances
100% - your enemy in the job market is not recognising your worth and the treasures you have already at hand
In some sense, taking the coproduct over all n in Core(FinSet) i.e. the groupoid of all finite sets and bijections, is an important example of a coproduct decomposition of a category (and the same goes for e.g. Core(FinVect)
elementary usage I recently had in mind: if a functor is fully faithful, then need it be injective on morphisms? No! consider [id,id] : C β C β C
agda proof of eckman--hilton
in comparison this agda proof is too wordy but syntactically v pleasing
lean 4 proof of eckman--hilton
proof of eckman--hilton, really leaves something to be desired and I wonder how a nicer version would look (in terms of syntax)
choose to believe this is a meme about cubical agda
I thought it would be writing on-the-fly python scripts to extract tables from pdf documents
imo I think a better term, in this context, is to cal them a type of (stochastic) program synthesizer, and the specification/tests/compiler/linter/typechecker as, hopefully, the verifier
the conspiracy theory I meant to be referring to is that notion capitalism keeps tons of people employed even whilst what they all do is useless
I would say it is best to not think about it as a categorification of a top space, but also lawvere says you think of this as a βlocallyβ modality which gets at spatially what coverages are about
youβll probably enjoy Lawvereβs def more if you havenβt come across it, a topology is a strong monad on Prop
Not standard but started as broadcasting of womenβs cricket has become more common in the last ~5 years and is now not unusual