Admin Husic's Avatar

Admin Husic

@husician

Associate professor of water resources engineering at Virginia Tech. Fascinated by hydrologic interfaces and my dog, Darcy.

509
Followers
227
Following
18
Posts
08.09.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Admin Husic @husician

Video thumbnail

“I watched him die… then I watched them maneuver his body like a rag doll— only to discover it was because they wanted to count the bullet wounds and see how many they ‘got’, like he was a deer.”

28.01.2026 05:46 👍 25157 🔁 11767 💬 915 📌 1050
Video thumbnail

Dave Matthews and Tim Ryenolds playing Neil Young’s Ohio last night and ends with some Rage Against the Machine.

24.01.2026 23:35 👍 1926 🔁 614 💬 32 📌 131
Alex Pretti, wearing a green sweater with his VA badge on.

Alex Pretti, wearing a green sweater with his VA badge on.

This is Alex Pretti.

This morning he was murdered by ICE. Six ICE agents held him down and shot him at point blank range. Alex was a nurse and researcher at the VA.

Our thoughts are with his loved ones and we stand united in action calling for the abolishment of ICE.

#ScientistsAgainstICE

24.01.2026 20:03 👍 1651 🔁 773 💬 27 📌 35

Best of luck, Chris!

15.01.2026 22:42 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
We need an Iowa Secretary of Agriculture for the people not just corporate agriculture. #iowa #water #waterquality #agriculture #farming TikTok video by Chris Jones for IA AgSecretary

so begins day 1 of campaign
www.tiktok.com/@chrisjones4...

15.01.2026 20:28 👍 31 🔁 8 💬 1 📌 1
Post image

If you are going to #AGU2025, come check out the various talks and posters from members of our research group. I hope to see you in New Orleans next week!

10.12.2025 16:01 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 1
Post image Post image Post image

Congratulations to two students in our lab, Nishchal and Sugam, for their successful MS theses defenses yesterday! Nishchal's thesis is entitled "American rivers are transporting more sediment in less time." Sugam's thesis is entitled "Why are some watersheds more sediment productive than others?"

05.12.2025 15:41 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
Rivers are heating up faster than the air − that’s a problem for aquatic life and people River heat waves are rising faster than the pace of air heat waves. That’s a problem for fish, drinking water quality, and food and energy production.

Rivers are heating up faster than the air − that’s a problem for aquatic life and people

doi.org/10.64628/AAI...

www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...

25.09.2025 14:20 👍 39 🔁 22 💬 1 📌 2
Preview
Mud swallowed half of this Kansas lake. Engineers think they can fight back In dry years, Tuttle Creek Lake and other reservoirs keep the Kansas River flowing strong enough to provide drinking water for hundreds of thousands of people. But these manmade lakes are disappearing...

The US Army Corps of Engineers is doing a test run of an underwater dredging method right now in Kansas. This method hasn't been used on a lake before, so it's unclear whether it will work: www.kcur.org/news/2025-09...

19.09.2025 14:25 👍 3 🔁 2 💬 1 📌 0
Preview
The merchants of doubt are back But this time, it's the U.S. government pushing doubt

On The Climate Brink, I write about the DOE report and our response.

02.09.2025 14:12 👍 74 🔁 42 💬 2 📌 5
DOEresponseSite On July 29, 2025, the Department of Energy (DOE) published a report from its Climate Working Group (CWG). This report features prominently in the EPA's reconsideration of its 2009 Endangerment Finding...

The Department of Energy hired five academics to raise doubts about climate change. 85+ climate experts (organized by @andrewdessler.com) reviewed their report. Our conclusion, detailed in 450 pages of analysis: it is biased, full of errors, and not fit to inform policy making.

02.09.2025 13:07 👍 1191 🔁 506 💬 21 📌 37

The worst part about having a paper rejected is not the rejection itself, it's knowing that you'll have to reformat the manuscript for some new online portal submission system.

09.08.2025 23:14 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Can we have a moratorium on using any variant of the word "Advance" at the start of an AGU session title? Nearly 1 in 4 Hydrology sessions begin this way. Alphabetical sorting means these sessions appear at the top - maybe the motivation? An ironic result is that they become harder to differentiate.

30.07.2025 16:44 👍 3 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0
This DOE report is best understood through the lens of a well-known saying: “process is product.” In other words, the final document reflects the process that created it — including, most importantly, who was selected to write it. The authors of this report are widely recognized contrarians who don’t represent the mainstream scientific consensus. If almost any other group of scientists had been chosen, the report would have been dramatically different. The only way to get this report was to pick these authors.
The report they produced should be thought of as a law brief from attorneys defending their client, carbon dioxide. Their goal is not to weigh the evidence fairly but to build the strongest possible case for CO2’s innocence. This is a fundamental departure from the norms of science. 
A lawyer is expected to represent their client zealously and selectively, presenting only the information that strengthens their case and leaving it to the opposing counsel to present the other side. In fact, a lawyer who stood up in court and gave equal weight to both sides of a case would be considered professionally negligent, possibly even disbarred.
In science, the standard is the opposite. Scientists are obligated to engage with the full range of evidence, especially that which might contradict their hypotheses. Ignoring contrary data is not just bad practice, in some cases it can rise to the level of scientific misconduct. 
Scientific credibility depends on a willingness to base conclusions on all of the evidence. When scientists cherry-pick data or misrepresent the balance of evidence, they are violating a core principle of the discipline.
In this report, the authors are firmly in lawyer mode. They sift through data to find the few examples that support their narrative while systematically ignoring the much larger body of evidence that contradicts it. 
In conclusion, this report does not appear to be a fair assessment of the state of climate science.

This DOE report is best understood through the lens of a well-known saying: “process is product.” In other words, the final document reflects the process that created it — including, most importantly, who was selected to write it. The authors of this report are widely recognized contrarians who don’t represent the mainstream scientific consensus. If almost any other group of scientists had been chosen, the report would have been dramatically different. The only way to get this report was to pick these authors. The report they produced should be thought of as a law brief from attorneys defending their client, carbon dioxide. Their goal is not to weigh the evidence fairly but to build the strongest possible case for CO2’s innocence. This is a fundamental departure from the norms of science. A lawyer is expected to represent their client zealously and selectively, presenting only the information that strengthens their case and leaving it to the opposing counsel to present the other side. In fact, a lawyer who stood up in court and gave equal weight to both sides of a case would be considered professionally negligent, possibly even disbarred. In science, the standard is the opposite. Scientists are obligated to engage with the full range of evidence, especially that which might contradict their hypotheses. Ignoring contrary data is not just bad practice, in some cases it can rise to the level of scientific misconduct. Scientific credibility depends on a willingness to base conclusions on all of the evidence. When scientists cherry-pick data or misrepresent the balance of evidence, they are violating a core principle of the discipline. In this report, the authors are firmly in lawyer mode. They sift through data to find the few examples that support their narrative while systematically ignoring the much larger body of evidence that contradicts it. In conclusion, this report does not appear to be a fair assessment of the state of climate science.

I've been getting a lot of requests for comments on the DOE report "A critical review of the impact of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions on the U.S. climate". Here are some initial thoughts. More will come later.

30.07.2025 03:26 👍 150 🔁 63 💬 9 📌 12
Post image

If your journal manuscript gets this group of Pyr reviewers... god help you!

23.07.2025 14:39 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
After 7 Decades of Measurements From a Peak in Hawaii, Trump’s Budget Would End Them

Trump is closing all four climate observatory stations in Alaska, Hawaii, American Samoa, and Antartica. Because you can't have high CO2 levels if you don't *measure* CO2 levels.

roll_safe.gif

19.07.2025 01:27 👍 2335 🔁 1224 💬 56 📌 134
A blue, red, and black graphic reads: "Celebrate Juneteenth."

A blue, red, and black graphic reads: "Celebrate Juneteenth."

In observance of #Juneteenth, Virginia Tech offices are closed today.

As we recognize Juneteenth, we also reaffirm our commitment to building a community rooted in our Principles of Community - one that rejects hate, violence, and racism.

➡️ vt.edu/principles-of-community

19.06.2025 14:39 👍 8 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 1
Preview
Ion Clusters Reveal the Sources, Impacts, and Drivers of Freshwater Salinization Population growth, land use change, climate change, and natural resource extraction are driving the salinization of freshwater resources worldwide. Reversing these trends will require data-centric app...

🚨 New in ES&T! @pubs.acs.org

Ion clusters in an urban stream reveal how salinization varies with hydrology. Storms, baseflow, and snowmelt each leave distinct chemical fingerprints.

A tool for targeting risk & smarter watershed policy: doi.org/10.1021/acs....

@diveredu.bsky.social

16.06.2025 23:31 👍 7 🔁 3 💬 1 📌 0

I would say that it is worth it to make the most of your remaining eligibility. At a minimum it gets you thinking long-term and building for the future, regardless of how uncertain things are now. Even if not funded, you will get valuable feedback.

31.05.2025 15:07 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Post image Post image Post image Post image

Shoutout to my students for fantastic presentations at #HydroML2025. They looked at applying deep learning to do large-scale, high-temporal resolution prediction of hydrograph separation, sediment transport, and freshwater salinization.

30.05.2025 18:49 👍 5 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0
Example of how the Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) satellite's water surface elevation measurements can be used to record flow wave propagation over space and generate a “spatial hydrograph.”

Example of how the Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) satellite's water surface elevation measurements can be used to record flow wave propagation over space and generate a “spatial hydrograph.”

Hydrologists! Ever heard of a Spatial Hydrograph? Our new paper in @agu.org GRL shows that the SWOT satellite can capture spatial flow waves propagating down rivers—something previously only only observable at river gauges: doi.org/10.1029/2024...

#SWOT #hydrology #RemoteSensing #EarthObservation

19.05.2025 18:15 👍 46 🔁 16 💬 4 📌 5
Post image Post image Post image Post image

Playing in the mud 😀

16.05.2025 14:42 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Video thumbnail

A Bosnian love ballad called "We will sing what our hearts know" 🇧🇦♥️🎶

13.05.2025 16:23 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Jeffrey Goldberg thinking he was being pranked and then realizing he was actually just in the war plans group chat is such a good microcosm of how it feels to be alive right now, everything seems fake until you realize it’s actually real and incredibly stupid

24.03.2025 22:03 👍 42295 🔁 8978 💬 303 📌 267

We expected 2,000 people out in GOP-held Greeley, Colorado.

11,000 people showed up.

Something special is happening, folks. Now is the time to organize in every dimension possible and get to work.

21.03.2025 21:23 👍 128439 🔁 25914 💬 3706 📌 1740
Preview
48 Scientific Societies Representing Almost 100,000 Scientists Ask Congress to Protect the Future of Science 48 scientific societies representing almost 100,000 scientists signed on to a letter asking Congress to protect the future of science

Today, a broad coalition of scientific professional societies who represent over 92,000 scientists are speaking out against the politicization and demonization of Federally funded science and government scientist jobs.

It was an honor to help the Union of Concerned Scientists with this! 🧪🌎

03.03.2025 15:52 👍 3318 🔁 1431 💬 67 📌 103

Slava Ukraini 🇺🇦

28.02.2025 18:20 👍 34891 🔁 4548 💬 398 📌 98
Preview
Variability of flowing stream network length across the US The aggregate length of flowing streams in a drainage network lengthens and shortens as landscapes become wetter and drier. However, direct measurements of stream network variability have been limited...

Variability of flowing stream network length across the US | Science www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...

16.02.2025 13:42 👍 15 🔁 9 💬 0 📌 0
Post image Post image Post image

Watershed models of flow, sediment, and nutrients are continuously improving. However, the metrics we use to evaluate these models were developed decades ago. In a new paper, we present a set of performance criteria for evaluating models at sub-daily and daily timesteps.
doi.org/10.1016/j.wa...

29.01.2025 14:38 👍 1 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0
Post image Post image Post image

Watershed models of flow, sediment, and nutrients are continuously improving. However, the metrics we use to evaluate these models were developed decades ago. In a new paper, we present a set of performance criteria for evaluating models at sub-daily and daily timesteps.
doi.org/10.1016/j.wa...

29.01.2025 14:38 👍 1 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0