To revers it we need at least the same amount of energy that was set free during the production. So you're doubt is very realistic.
Best we can do is engineer our life with the heated globe. There are realistic solutions, but they take time
To revers it we need at least the same amount of energy that was set free during the production. So you're doubt is very realistic.
Best we can do is engineer our life with the heated globe. There are realistic solutions, but they take time
Let's assume all of the world stops burning fossil fuels right now, you know what's gonna happen? The earth will get even hotter, cause we put out a lot of gases that reduce impact. The issue is, those will be gone in a few years. The CO2 stays for thousands.
There are far more then just one problem
So basically be the value obsessed Midwesterner ๐
700W is enough to get my food boiling within 3 minutes, so why add more power? After all, all taste and texture will be out anyway
Good thing I call everyone a cunt then ๐คฃ
Same, till the day I took one apart. Such a disappointment for little me
At least they both lack skills ๐
Get well soon
Better rest up then, but remember to stay hydrated
Statistically speaking you need at least 3 to make a solid prediction
It still beats Brussels Sprouts
I've watched a lot of the debates and rallies, and I've not seen either being said by the candidates. Can you point me in the right direction for where they specifically state these goals?