Jake Yeston's Avatar

Jake Yeston

@jakeyeston

Editor at @science.org, shepherding chemistry papers; views here are my own; he/him

6,513
Followers
2,761
Following
4,706
Posts
22.08.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Jake Yeston @jakeyeston

Yes exactly!

09.03.2026 23:39 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

What was #ChemTwitter like…

09.03.2026 23:17 πŸ‘ 23 πŸ” 3 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0

I mean my absolute favorite thing about this is when you *start* there are folks who won’t work with carbon tet🀣🀣🀣🀣🀣

09.03.2026 23:27 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

I'm not complaining because I'm privileged to do what I do. But yes, this is it. It's constantly funny what a lot of people think authors make. "But you must get a lot of royalties from all those books!" 🀣

09.03.2026 20:58 πŸ‘ 17 πŸ” 3 πŸ’¬ 3 πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
NASA administrator talks to Science about studying the Moon, Marsβ€”and Earth Jared Isaacman says agency may accelerate lunar science program and could tackle a new Mars mission in 2028

My latest: in an interview with @science.org, new NASA administrator Jared Isaacman promises a big uptick in lunar robotic missions, another potential Mars 2028 mission beyond comms, and continued support for earth science observation.

(Sorry astro and helio folks, time went fast.)

09.03.2026 20:21 πŸ‘ 22 πŸ” 10 πŸ’¬ 3 πŸ“Œ 3
Preview
a cookie monster is sitting on a table with a thumbs up ALT: a cookie monster is sitting on a table with a thumbs up

Anyway when @stuartcantrill.com has a lot of free time, he should make an epic Eras Tour thread of ChemTwitter’s greatest hits with appropriate Taylor Swift tie-ins

09.03.2026 16:22 πŸ‘ 6 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
09.03.2026 15:55 πŸ‘ 13 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 1

😎

09.03.2026 15:54 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Let’s get physical

09.03.2026 15:49 πŸ‘ 5 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
My name is Marisa Kabas, and I'm an independent journalist who publishes The Handbasket. I'm reaching out about a matter that involves your team and that continues to trouble me.

In June of last year, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and I filed a FOIA lawsuit against the DC Metropolitan Police Department to compel them to release body camera footage from the March 17, 2025 DOGE raid on the US Institute of Peace. What followed was months of back and forth with their lawyers, arguing why it was in the public interest to release the un-redacted footage in its entirety. Though tiny segments were handed over, that wasn't enough: We wanted all of it.Β 

On February 18, 2026, a DC judge ruled in our favor, and your reporter Mark Segraves sent a kind note of congratulations that day. Then on Monday, March 2nd, the footage was handed over to me and excitedly announced I'd received it and would be reviewing it in the coming days and sharing what I learned. When Segraves emailed me this past Thursday asking for my phone number, I didn't think much of it. But when he called me just before 2pm on Friday to let me know NBC4 Washington would be airing a segment at 5pm, I grew concerned.Β 

Segraves said he'd obtained some of the footage via a FOIA request that week after he heard the footage had been released to me. He said he'd credit the work of RCFP and me, but it was little comfort. I asked if he'd known the day before when he emailed me for my number, why didn't he tell me then? He didn't have a good answer for that. He acknowledged all the hard work I'd done getting this footage released. I asked him if he could hold the story until Monday, to which he replied that he's "not just a blogger" (implying that that's all I am, presumably) and that he'd have to check with his editor. I said fine. Nearly an hour later he called back to say his editor refused to hold the story, but that they were happy to interview me via Zoom to add to the package, and I said I would.

My name is Marisa Kabas, and I'm an independent journalist who publishes The Handbasket. I'm reaching out about a matter that involves your team and that continues to trouble me. In June of last year, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and I filed a FOIA lawsuit against the DC Metropolitan Police Department to compel them to release body camera footage from the March 17, 2025 DOGE raid on the US Institute of Peace. What followed was months of back and forth with their lawyers, arguing why it was in the public interest to release the un-redacted footage in its entirety. Though tiny segments were handed over, that wasn't enough: We wanted all of it.Β  On February 18, 2026, a DC judge ruled in our favor, and your reporter Mark Segraves sent a kind note of congratulations that day. Then on Monday, March 2nd, the footage was handed over to me and excitedly announced I'd received it and would be reviewing it in the coming days and sharing what I learned. When Segraves emailed me this past Thursday asking for my phone number, I didn't think much of it. But when he called me just before 2pm on Friday to let me know NBC4 Washington would be airing a segment at 5pm, I grew concerned.Β  Segraves said he'd obtained some of the footage via a FOIA request that week after he heard the footage had been released to me. He said he'd credit the work of RCFP and me, but it was little comfort. I asked if he'd known the day before when he emailed me for my number, why didn't he tell me then? He didn't have a good answer for that. He acknowledged all the hard work I'd done getting this footage released. I asked him if he could hold the story until Monday, to which he replied that he's "not just a blogger" (implying that that's all I am, presumably) and that he'd have to check with his editor. I said fine. Nearly an hour later he called back to say his editor refused to hold the story, but that they were happy to interview me via Zoom to add to the package, and I said I would.

What followed was two hours of furiously writing and posting clips of the footage to Youtube so I could get something published before the 5pm broadcast, and in the midst of that, recording a quick Zoom interview with a person who was about to take credit for my work. At 4:59pm ET, The Handbasket published a piece titled "Police body cam footage shows DOGE knew Institute of Peace was private property during raid." Then I tuned into NBC4 Washington via your website to catch the broadcast, and my instinct to rush to get something out first was proven right.Β 

"It's a story you're seeing first on News4," your newscast began. "For the first time we're getting an inside look at what happened the day the Trump administration took over the US Institute of Peace. News4 obtained more than four hours of police body camera video from that day." What followed was more than six minutes of clips and commentary from Segraves, but it's not until six minutes and 21 seconds into the piece that he mentions my name (mispronounced though he asked for the correct pronunciation on Zoom), "The Handbasket blog," and the RCFP's foundational role in bringing this footage to light. I was angry, but didn't feel there was much I could do.

Then I saw the version NBC4 posted to Instagram and TikTokβ€”the video itself made ZERO mention of the RCFP or my work, only briefly acknowledging it in the written caption on Instagram, and not even bothering to do that on TikTok. An average viewer with no background on the case is lead to believe that this footage was released because of your efforts. When I saw that, I decided I couldn't let this go.

It's difficult to explain what it's like to spend nearly a year working on a story only to have another reporter and outlet surreptitiously take credit for it; months of work and personal risk only to have another reporter lying in wait to swoop in. What NBC4 did was immoral, unethical, and to be frank, just truly sucked.

What followed was two hours of furiously writing and posting clips of the footage to Youtube so I could get something published before the 5pm broadcast, and in the midst of that, recording a quick Zoom interview with a person who was about to take credit for my work. At 4:59pm ET, The Handbasket published a piece titled "Police body cam footage shows DOGE knew Institute of Peace was private property during raid." Then I tuned into NBC4 Washington via your website to catch the broadcast, and my instinct to rush to get something out first was proven right.Β  "It's a story you're seeing first on News4," your newscast began. "For the first time we're getting an inside look at what happened the day the Trump administration took over the US Institute of Peace. News4 obtained more than four hours of police body camera video from that day." What followed was more than six minutes of clips and commentary from Segraves, but it's not until six minutes and 21 seconds into the piece that he mentions my name (mispronounced though he asked for the correct pronunciation on Zoom), "The Handbasket blog," and the RCFP's foundational role in bringing this footage to light. I was angry, but didn't feel there was much I could do. Then I saw the version NBC4 posted to Instagram and TikTokβ€”the video itself made ZERO mention of the RCFP or my work, only briefly acknowledging it in the written caption on Instagram, and not even bothering to do that on TikTok. An average viewer with no background on the case is lead to believe that this footage was released because of your efforts. When I saw that, I decided I couldn't let this go. It's difficult to explain what it's like to spend nearly a year working on a story only to have another reporter and outlet surreptitiously take credit for it; months of work and personal risk only to have another reporter lying in wait to swoop in. What NBC4 did was immoral, unethical, and to be frank, just truly sucked.

I just sent this email to the news director at NBC4 Washington about the unprofessional and disrespectful way they handled publishing the body camera footage of the DOGE raid on the US Institute of Peace that was obtained via my FOIA lawsuit:

09.03.2026 14:55 πŸ‘ 4409 πŸ” 921 πŸ’¬ 106 πŸ“Œ 83

My two main controversial opinions are that Fahrenheit is good and Daylight Savings Time is bad. Feel free to express solidarity in appealsπŸ˜‰

08.03.2026 01:03 πŸ‘ 12 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 4 πŸ“Œ 0
A quote by H. Holden Thorp, Editor-in-chief of Science journals, on a black background. The quote is: "… why curtail a program … that cultivates and grows the number of US graduate students and future researchers?"

A quote by H. Holden Thorp, Editor-in-chief of Science journals, on a black background. The quote is: "… why curtail a program … that cultivates and grows the number of US graduate students and future researchers?"

"There is perhaps no stronger evidence of the [Trump] administration’s objectives to reduce the quality of the US scientific workforce than its treatment of the [NSF]’s flagship Graduate Research Fellowship Program," writes H. Holden Thorp in a new #ScienceEditorial. https://scim.ag/4d0fi3N

05.03.2026 20:11 πŸ‘ 44 πŸ” 19 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus), such as this mother and 7-month-old joey from Queensland, Australia, embody a genetic paradox. Populations rich in diversity are declining, whereas those with little variation are expanding and rapidly reshuffling their genomes. These findings reveal that diversity alone does not determine resilience. Instead, a population’s fate depends on several evolutionary processes unfolding across generations.

Koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus), such as this mother and 7-month-old joey from Queensland, Australia, embody a genetic paradox. Populations rich in diversity are declining, whereas those with little variation are expanding and rapidly reshuffling their genomes. These findings reveal that diversity alone does not determine resilience. Instead, a population’s fate depends on several evolutionary processes unfolding across generations.

According to a new study of Australia’s koala populations, rapid demographic rebound may be able to restore once-lost genetic variation and drive recombination in ways that re-establish long-term evolutionary potential in previously bottlenecked populations.

Learn more: https://scim.ag/4b6hLaE

05.03.2026 19:05 πŸ‘ 46 πŸ” 12 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Science stories for young readers

My daughter and I reviewed Megan Durnford’s terrific book β€œOur Plastic Problem: A Call for Global Solutions” in this week’s @science.org

chemsky #chemchat

www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...

05.03.2026 20:35 πŸ‘ 14 πŸ” 2 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

🀣🀣🀣

05.03.2026 02:52 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

the first meeting of the shark coterie board

03.03.2026 21:35 πŸ‘ 18 πŸ” 2 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 1

Nearing a decade @science.org, this is a point I should stress more. It's only $25/year to support one of the largest science-focused newsrooms in the world. Independent and nonprofit.

27.02.2026 14:43 πŸ‘ 15 πŸ” 10 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Our organocatalytic stereoselective head-to-tail macrocyclization is now out in @science.org! We use a peptide catalyst to access 12- to 18-membered rings featuring various functionalities with catalyst-controlled stereochemical outcome. #chemsky

27.02.2026 07:16 πŸ‘ 7 πŸ” 3 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
NSF officials break silence on how AI and quantum now drive agency grantmaking Leaders acknowledge White House role in controversial moves

NSF leaders have just acknowledged what many scientists have long suspected: Presidential directives to boost AI and quantum have upended its traditional way of doing business. www.science.org/content/arti...

26.02.2026 22:35 πŸ‘ 86 πŸ” 65 πŸ’¬ 6 πŸ“Œ 10

In their Perspective, Ziyang Dong and Changgui Zhao note "Rackl et al. provide a way to synthesize macromolecules without a metal catalyst. The approach avoids toxic metal residues on the reaction product and eliminates reliance on scarce precious metal" www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...

26.02.2026 20:22 πŸ‘ 9 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Organocatalyst-controlled stereoselective head-to-tail macrocyclizations Chiral macrocycles are key to the discovery of new medicines. Their synthesis is, however, challenging and typically requires the often-cumbersome installation of stereochemical features in a linear p...

In @science.org for chemsky this week, @wennemersgroup.bsky.social asymmetrically clasp macrocycles using a peptide catalyst

www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...

26.02.2026 20:19 πŸ‘ 15 πŸ” 2 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 2

In fact quite credible, but still remarkable

26.02.2026 15:00 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
The Man Who Stole Infinity | Quanta Magazine In an 1874 paper, Georg Cantor proved that there are different sizes of infinity and changed math forever. A trove of newly unearthed letters shows that it was also an act of plagiarism.

Incredible story and reporting in @quantamagazine.bsky.social

www.quantamagazine.org/the-man-who-...

26.02.2026 13:39 πŸ‘ 15 πŸ” 6 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 6
4-panel comic. (1) [Person with white hat talking to another person.] PERSON 1 with white hat: As Sherlock Holmes said, When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth. (2) PERSON 2: What about the possibility that you forgot to eliminate a possibility? Or that you eliminated one incorrectly? Both of those remain, too. (3) PERSON 1: You’re being pedantic. It’s just a general rule for deduction. PERSON 2: But it’s a *bad rule*. (4) PERSON 2: How often have you thought, β€œI can’t find this thing, and I’ve searched the whole house. The only place I haven’t looked is the car, so it *must* be there.” PERSON 2: ...And then it’s never in the car. PERSON 1: *It’s never in the car!*

4-panel comic. (1) [Person with white hat talking to another person.] PERSON 1 with white hat: As Sherlock Holmes said, When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth. (2) PERSON 2: What about the possibility that you forgot to eliminate a possibility? Or that you eliminated one incorrectly? Both of those remain, too. (3) PERSON 1: You’re being pedantic. It’s just a general rule for deduction. PERSON 2: But it’s a *bad rule*. (4) PERSON 2: How often have you thought, β€œI can’t find this thing, and I’ve searched the whole house. The only place I haven’t looked is the car, so it *must* be there.” PERSON 2: ...And then it’s never in the car. PERSON 1: *It’s never in the car!*

Eliminating the Impossible

xkcd.com/3210/

25.02.2026 21:19 πŸ‘ 2852 πŸ” 457 πŸ’¬ 38 πŸ“Œ 24

😭

25.02.2026 12:50 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
American Voices | Alexandria Choral Society March 8, 2026 | 3:00 PM & 7:00 PM @ George Washington Masonic Memorial

@alexchoral.bsky.social is partnering with the Washington Metropolitan Philharmonic for two concerts on March 8th at the GW Masonic Memorial. Bernstein! Challenging ruminations on humanity's stewardship of our planet! Fun! Tickets on sale now. Do you remember Icarus?

13.02.2026 18:30 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 2 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 5

Also when I typed this the first time, choral was accidentally chiral and I should have left it that way🀣

25.02.2026 12:05 πŸ‘ 10 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
How to solve the tenor shortage A voice that is made, not found

Why did no one tell me @economist.com ran not just an article, but also a whole editorial, bemoaning the choral tenor shortage!!!

They should come hear @alexchoral.bsky.social 🀣

www.economist.com/leaders/2026...

25.02.2026 12:04 πŸ‘ 7 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Suprematism, by Nikolai Suetin, 1920-21, πŸ“Έ by @tiltoncreative

22.02.2026 16:24 πŸ‘ 9976 πŸ” 2277 πŸ’¬ 65 πŸ“Œ 112
Video thumbnail

Reported in @science.org, lithium pentasilacyclopentadienyl complexes.

These silicon analogues of the cyclopentadienyl ligand have a non-planar 5-membered ring and further characterisation shows evidence of aromaticity.

πŸ”— CSD Entry EXOMUD: dx.doi.org/10.5517/ccdc...

#FeaturedStructureFriday

20.02.2026 14:02 πŸ‘ 23 πŸ” 7 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0