How is that not a bit?
How is that not a bit?
Yeah, v much if they were bright enough for that, theyβd probably not have behaved so consistently stupidly up to now.
Thank you, youβd be v welcome.
I might want reparations.
Ah, to be fair to me, I didnβt go back and read it, because I felt I should join in with committing to the bit rather than get too burdened by what people *actually* said.
Chat, what does βvery malignβ mean? Is it a way of dodging reparations?
I think the reparations question is interesting but Gordon Brown spearheaded a movement to forgive vast amounts of debt and wouldnβt you want that to be general, not just successor nations of places βweβ colonised / exploited?
You .. really donβt appear to know what the word means.
Werenβt you minimising the Welsh element by blaming the Scots more though, eh? I mean, correctly, sure but still, minimising.
No, I mean contextualise. You might need to look both words up.
Or if youβre trolling, decent work, well done.
You appear to have provided a screenshot which entirely supports what twill and I are saying, thank you.
Yes, quite amusing to be told we know nothing of British imperial crimes in a conversation where every single participant is discussing those crimes and contextualising them. We know!
This has the benefit of being really quite funny at times, because theyβre such losers but obvs the disadvantage of being really quite bad for society.
Youβre still in Spanish, according to Bluesky, by the way. Is this because you want the woke points for speaking the language of the global South?
Well, not always *their* dead, now that you mention it.
Spurs are a poor team by EPL standards and might well get relegated. They finished 4th in the league phase and werenβt even all that lucky to do so!
Chelsea will v likely also go out but kept PSG to under 1xG and got done by brilliant finishing which happens but doesnβt tell you much about the EPL
Knock out is obviously how the tournament gets decided but itβs not a v good way to judge comparative league strength because thereβs a large random element. Each of the English teams have played 9 games, except Newcastle (11). The results overall suggest theyβre pretty good.
Usually Liverpoolβs approach of only moving on players they really want was a good one but it did leave a midfield rebuild at least a season late.
He was certainly reported as having much more control over the squad by then, including deciding to extend Henderson. I mean sure, the injuries that season were bad but not that surprising given previous records.
I think the OP criticism of Slot is fair enough and that Jones has been used surprisingly sparingly. Itβs far from impossible that Slot knows things about his injury risk that we donβt but even so, canβt see why he didnβt get on for half an hour yesterday.
Still, all coaches make mistakes.
I do think 22/23 was much more his fault though, albeit still injury related but recruitment was more under his control then and his loyalty to ageing / injury prone midfielders was optimistic, especially given the demands his football placed on them.
This isnβt to say I donβt worship the guy.
20/21 was looking like a perfectly good season until Van Dijk got injured and potentially still okay until Gomez and Matip (think odds on for title after the 7-0 away win at Palace in December). Could only blame Klopp for not recruiting more CBs and Van Dijk had previously been bomb proof.
Bluesky kindly offered me a translation of this (it thinks it was posted in Spanish) but sadly the translation didnβt include any 2010 political meme elucidation at all.
The people voted for HedgehoggyMcHedgehogface, letβs oppose the people and the hedgehogs in one brutal attack on woke.
Never change Kemi (obviously she wonβt).
I do, yes.
Seems a big commitment to buy a starting RB, in that context. But we clearly canβt rely on Bradley.
RB is another position where weβve perhaps got ourselves a bit stuck. Bradley is presumably being paid somewhere between established squad and starter wages but is injured *lots* and even if Frimpong is mostly playing RW, heβs presumably cover, as is Gomez if staying.
Youβd want the full backs to hold the width a lot, which wouldnβt be bad for Frimpong or Kerkez, to be fair and it would be demanding on a midfield 3.
Iβm not totally opposed.
Not so much that you couldnβt do it but more that it wouldnβt be all that robust and youβd either have to change systems (youβre not playing them both together twice a week) or rotate Gakpo and perhaps Rio in as L forwards, rather than wingers. That could work, perhaps.
Can see them both playing with Wirtz behind but itβs hard to run the sort of disrespect eleven that murdered Frankfurt in the EPL too often (those three, Gakpo LW, Frimpong at RB), Iβd have thought.
This is fair but itβs still quite impressive, in a way, not to have got even one.
Theyβll have an idea of how many minutes he can play over what sort of time but him coming off after 70 mins and Gakpo playing to 86 leaves the possibility heβll start pretty live, Iβd say.
Itβs impressive, in a way, that heβs not managed even one of those, or a header, or even a deflection off his bum at a set piece.