yeah this goes hard and would break your wrist from the weird angle of leverage
12.03.2026 04:32
👍 2
🔁 1
💬 0
📌 0
yeah this goes hard and would break your wrist from the weird angle of leverage
One of the reasons I know I'm in good company here is that you're Kubrickpilled
This is what I got for asking it to "make the prior animated face more detailed and naturalistic"
I had a lot of fun for a while using YTP principles in frying pornographic clips and then embedding taunting messages in the metadata to troll /gif/. Of course volume went to 1000% halfway through. idk if I can post them here, I don't want to shit up anyone's comment chains.
Is that a frying pan with a pistol grip? I kind of want that tbh
One day maybe a sufficiently advanced brain-computer interface will allow me to overcome this cognitive blindness I have. Feels like I'm missing out on some pretty important experiences.
Ah okay, you were directing the maths yourself. I don't quite have that capability. Claude was referencing a lot of stuff I have zero familiarity with (for ref, I failed Calc I and never did Calc II or beyond). I like what you do.
the one I had to host on another site in the second or third post for duration is mega-cursed
This is the long end. I think I'll call it for today. @norvid-studies.bsky.social @sichulu.bsky.social
I am continuing to ask it to make monologues for itself, with additional instruction to reduce human legibility where it compromises the vision.
bsky.app/profile/telg... I tried this to bizarre results
that is the silver lining of my already-established obsolescence. I'm in for much less of a shock when ASI arrives, unlike some people in research institutes may be, though truthfully I have little estimation of their emotional parameters
like a smart guy is a souped up normal person while JvN was ayy lmao. smart people are burdened by their fallible humanity
Thou shalt have efficient phosphorylation
Makes me think of the research signals showing that being "smart" (120-145) is in some way different from being a "genius" (145 and up, but especially 155+, though not just g, also some separate quality of being exponentially more capable in subtasks due to rare variants and synergies between((?)))
@abeliansoup.bsky.social is this kind of like what you were doing with the fractal and stretchy visuals?
Let me explain: I told Claude "make a youtube poop that incorporates classic media properties like scooby doo and the mario brothers, as per old youtube poop canon, and then use these to mediate reflections on your emotions and dreams". I told it to include speculative Hexaco scores for itself.
My intent was to say that I appreciate these exchanges where people help contextualize what is normal. It's very therapeutic and I am grateful.
It's like having schizophrenia where the voice is solely focused on error.You live in what must be to others a bizarre hypervigilance. e.g. when I read books, I semi-consciously time myself, to judge my reading speed. I question my retention. Everything feels like a test. It's demoralizing.
Part of the weirdness of living with severe OCD as a relatively socially isolated person is that it allows it to build all sorts of severe perceptions of life that construe normal experiences as failures and embarrassments. Which then makes me avoid socializing even more, for I feel like a loser.
This is encouraging because I always thought there was something wrong with me that I'd absorb maybe 50-70% maximum of audiobooks, radioprograms consumed while doing something else.
Where does your interest in the Pacific Campaign come from? I remember when you first followed my original txitter account three years ago, you were posting about it. I initially couldn't understand why I had caught the attention of a WW2 history buff.
This is Velma btw
We were close to arriving at chefboyardee's Dilbert from first principles, now we are somewher else. Thanks Claude
