My colleagues and I studied the effect on Obama nominees alone, pre- and post- Nov 2013. We find post-filibuster: faster confirmation times, higher confirmation rates, but not a big shift to appoint more liberal nominees (plotted here). www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi...
09.12.2025 01:50
👍 2
🔁 1
💬 1
📌 0
Definitely potential for a post-filibuster effect, but not enough presidencies per party yet to really see (e.g., for Rs, impossible to untangle filibuster end from a pure Trump effect).
09.12.2025 01:50
👍 3
🔁 1
💬 1
📌 0
Would be super fascinating to try to measure the post-filibuster effect (similar to a post-Loper Bright effect in the coming years). I wouldn't be surprised if there is already or forthcoming polisci work on this @theclboyd.bsky.social
07.12.2025 15:29
👍 4
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
It's that time of year again! #GoBlue
25.11.2025 14:51
👍 4
🔁 1
💬 0
📌 0
The Game at Michigan Law
YouTube video by Michigan Law
It's my fourth year teaching here at Michigan Law, and my fourth big game since moving to The School Up North. We love it here in Michigan, but our football loyalties remain unchanged. 🤓
Time to re-up my favorite welcome video: youtu.be/jWCFaJ0tMfE?...
25.11.2025 02:28
👍 13
🔁 2
💬 2
📌 1
Here's the opinion: cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/op...
25.08.2025 17:44
👍 1
🔁 1
💬 1
📌 0
Today the Ninth Circuit denied rehearing en banc in an important immigration case. Mike Kagan and I had filed an amicus brief urging rehearing. The panel opinion had made a mess of Loper Bright.
We did get three judges dissenting, and Judge Bumatay kindly gives our brief a shoutout in his dissent:
25.08.2025 17:44
👍 11
🔁 5
💬 1
📌 0
Attn law review editors: There are some excellent articles in the SSRN #adlaw reading list from last month that are apparently still looking for a home: www.yalejreg.com/nc/administr...
14.08.2025 20:04
👍 10
🔁 2
💬 0
📌 0
Screenshot of the following text: Stare Decisis and the Missing Administrability Inquiry
New York University Law Review (forthcoming 2025)
U of Michigan Public Law Research Paper No. 25-004
40 Pages Posted: 7 Aug 2025 Last revised: 11 Aug 2025
Andrew Hammond
Indiana University Maurer School of Law
Christopher J. Walker
University of Michigan Law School
Date Written: August 06, 2025
Abstract
Administrative law is undergoing a tremendous amount of change. Presidential administrations have abandoned long-held practices and embraced new strategies to make policy through adjudication and regulation. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court has reworked foundational principles of federal administrative law including agency independence, adjudication, and legal interpretation. What does the pace and degree of change in administrative law mean for the federal courts? We posit that some answers lie in the Supreme Court’s decision in Kisor v. Wilkie and its application in the lower courts over the last five years.
In Kisor v. Wilkie, the Court was asked to reconsider its longstanding precedents concerning judicial deference to federal agencies’ interpretations of their own regulations. The result was a splintered decision that produced more questions than answers. Justice Kagan, writing for the plurality (and in parts, the Court), reaffirmed those precedents, including Auer and Seminole Rock, but also clarified and expanded the ways in which such deference should be constrained. Justice Gorsuch penned the principal opposing opinion, arguing that the Court should abandon Auer deference entirely. Chief Justice Roberts cast the deciding vote based on stare decisis, suggesting that “the
New draft on @ssrn.bsky.social: Stare Decisis and the Missing Administrability Inquiry
By Professor @chrisjwalker.bsky.social and @andrewshammond.bsky.social (@iumaurerlaw.bsky.social)
@ssrn.bsky.social: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
12.08.2025 17:13
👍 8
🔁 4
💬 0
📌 0
New to SSRN: Andrew Hammond and I have posted a draft of a symposium essay from our Kisor dataset, entitled The End of Administrative Pragmatism? This one explores how Kisor, Loper Bright, and Consumers' Research affect theories in administrative law. Link here: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
13.08.2025 20:09
👍 10
🔁 1
💬 0
📌 0
For users of the Hickman, Pierce, & Walker federal admin law textbook, @chrisjwalker.bsky.social has posted the link to our summer supplement at the Notice & Comment blog. We're working on the 5th edition. Feedback from users is always welcome.
07.08.2025 17:30
👍 2
🔁 1
💬 0
📌 0
New to SSRN: Andrew Hammond and I have posted a draft of Stare Decisis and the Missing Administrability Inquiry: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.... This is the first paper from our Kisor dataset, and it includes our findings from reviewing all lower-court decisions that invoke Kisor from 2019-2024.
06.08.2025 21:28
👍 10
🔁 2
💬 0
📌 0