Osman Sabri Kiratli

The source code is on github.com/okiratli/Citat… , but you DO NOT need it. Simply go to Releases section on the right side, and download the standalone Windows (exe) or MacOS (app) version.

4-     Color-coded output showing three types of issues: • Missing bibliography entries • Uncited references • Potential year mismatches.
5-     It works with a lot of different citation styles (e.g., APA, APSA, Chicago author-date, IEEE)

1-It is completely free to use
2-It has a full standalone program and Easy-to-use graphical interface for Windows and macOS. No Python, no command lines.
3-Year Mismatch Detection: Identifies potential year mismatches (e.g., online-first vs. final publication)

Fellow Academics: I’ve created a simple tool (with the help of AI) called Citations Cross Check. It does what the name implies: It verifies citations have bibliography entries AND bibliography entries are cited. github.com/okiratli/Citat… A few notes: 1/n

Announcing the 1st session of the SGIR Virtual IR Workshop Series!

Dr Fanny Badache, University of Geneva: "Contestation alignment in world politics: The case of UN peacekeeping operations"

Discussant: Prof Lora Anne Viola, Freie U

Wed 10th Dec 2025, 12pm CET
uofglasgow.zoom.us/j/81889216947

Note saying "New Data!"

For those who didn’t catch it:🚨 We’ve released 3 additional panel waves via @GESIS, bringing the total to 71 waves of survey data. Spanning Sep 2012–May 2024, the GIP dataset is fully accessible for researchers studying trends, attitudes, and social changes over more than a decade.

What Americans really think when European allies don’t cooperate NATO recently agreed to a historic 5% defence spending target. But Osman Sabri Kiratli presents new experimental evidence revealing that what Americans truly care about goes far beyond the numbers. In...

💰 #NATO has agreed to a historic 5% defence spending target. But @osmansabrikiratli.bsky.social of @ecprsgir.bsky.social presents 🆕 evidence revealing that what Americans truly care about goes beyond the numbers. In fact, democratic allies may have more leeway than they realise.
👉 bit.ly/3JXqqlX

NOW OUT ON FIRSTVIEW!!

The #Politics of #Alliance #Cohesion: #Experimental #Evidence on #American #Attitudes toward #Corrective #Measures in #Security #Partnerships

By @osmansabrikiratli.bsky.social

doi.org/10.1017/S153...

Bottom line: Public opinion shapes the credibility of alliance management. Leaders who ignore ally defection risk domestic backlash. This has implications for US foreign policy, especially as debates over NATO burden-sharing and alliance reliability intensify.

Exposure to ally behavior also affects support for US contributions to the alliance. Voters want reciprocity and demand cuts when partners
don’t pull their weight. Partisanship and ideology play a role too. Republicans and right-leaning voters are more supportive of restraint.

Also not all allies are equal. Americans are far less willing to punish democratic partners when they act uncooperatively. Regime type matters. Treaty status and military power? Surprisingly, not so much.

The results? Americans overwhelmingly favor action over inaction. But not all measures are equal. Coercive steps like cutting military aid or imposing sanctions are far more popular than public shaming or breaking the alliance.

Using a pre-registered survey experiment with 1,502 Americans, I tested support for different “corrective measures” against allies who underperform—like underspending on defense or buying weapons from rivals.

Publication day: My new paper @poppublicsphere.bsky.social explores American public attitudes toward punishing 'uncooperative' security partners. Turns out, voters have strong opinions👇 www.cambridge.org/core/journal...

Summer School of the Standing Group on International Relations European Consortium for Political Research

This is an excellent opportunity for students and early-career scholars in international relations. Highly recommended! ecpr.eu/Events/334

Names and institutional affiliations of the new SGIR steering committee. Rohan Mukherjee The London School of Economics & Political Science Maria Ferreira Universidade de Lisboa - Instituto Superior de Ciências Sociais e Políticas Lora Anne Viola Freie Universität Berlin Osman Sabri Kiratli Waseda University Bernhard Reinsberg University of Glasgow Raphael Oidtmann Universität Mannheim

We are delighted to announce the new @ecpr.bsky.social SGIR Steering Committee. Congratulations to Maria Ferreira, @osmansabrikiratli.bsky.social, @rohanmukherjee.bsky.social, @raphaeloidtmann.bsky.social, Bernhard Reinsberg, and Lora Anne Viola on their election!

Truly shocking move. Mavs lost big time. The only logical explanation I can come up with is some personal problems Doncic had with the team

Russian aggression and Europeans’ attitudes toward the EU – Evidence from the 2014 annexation of Crimea This research note investigates whether external military crises, short of war, in the neighbourhood of the European Union (EU) affects attitudes toward the EU. Specifically, I explore whether the Ru...

A similar piece on the topic. ejpr.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/... Unfortunately, the authors seem to miss it.

Russian aggression and Europeans’ attitudes toward the EU – Evidence from the 2014 annexation of Crimea This research note investigates whether external military crises, short of war, in the neighbourhood of the European Union (EU) affects attitudes toward the EU. Specifically, I explore whether the Ru...

A similar piece on the topic. ejpr.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/... Unfortunately, the authors seem to miss it.

Which makes me think that it's not going to be as isolationist as most people expect. Including in Ukraine

Obviously, this wouldn’t be an issue if journals start publishing null results more frequently, but unfortunately we’re not there yet.

I actually think the opposite. Pre-registration, despite necessary, deepens inequality. With more funding, more pre-registrations, more experiments, more likely to find "sign." results. With less money, if your experiment does not give you what you hoped for, you are empty-handed.

Would like to be added, please

Would like to be added, please

New paper with the best co-author @bschlipphak.bsky.social. If you are interested in populism and International Organizations, you would find this one interesting.

New paper with the best co-author @bschlipphak.bsky.social. If you are interested in populism and International Organizations, you would find this one interesting.

Is #SocialMedia bad for democracies? I contribute to this debate by exploring the impact of social media on institutional trust in the #EuropeanUnion. Published in Public Opinion Quarterly #OpenAccess
doi.org/10.1093/poq/...

3/ In such high-information environments, those who more frequently use online social networks, tend to trust those networks, and receive information on EU affairs from these networks, have less faith in the EU compared to those in regions with lower-quality internet access.

2/ I show that higher social media use correlates with lower trust in the EU among European citizens. But more troubling finding is this: Social media usage habits exert particularly detrimental effects in regions with wider and faster internet connections.

Is #SocialMedia bad for democracies? I contribute to this debate by exploring the impact of social media on institutional trust in the #EuropeanUnion. Published in Public Opinion Quarterly #OpenAccess
doi.org/10.1093/poq/...