News: Federal health officials are retreating from earlier endorsement of leucovorin as a drug that can treat autism.
www.statnews.com/2026/03/10/f...
@hollylynchez
Academic lawyer/bioethicist studying pharmaceutical policy, access to investigational medicines, IRB quality (www.aereo.org), and clinical research ethics and regulation, with a splash of psychedelics.
News: Federal health officials are retreating from earlier endorsement of leucovorin as a drug that can treat autism.
www.statnews.com/2026/03/10/f...
Despite recent controversial decisions, the FDA has stopped holding advisory committee meetings β which bring together regulators, companies, patients, and a panel of independent advisors to publicly discuss complex regulatory matters. I dug into why:
www.statnews.com/2026/03/09/f...
New pub w/ my fab Penn JD/MBE student, Tasneem Mohammad!
Prompted by an ALS drug sponsor's announcement that it was considering launching a trial before it had all $ in hand, we addressed the ethical role of IRBs in making sure studies have adequate funding.
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/...
"If nothing else, one hopes he has learned that the job of being an FDA official is even harder than it looks."
Thank you, @adamfeuerstein.bsky.social, for reporting Prasad's self-identifying statements from that press call (without naming him).
I don't think his departure comes today without it.
With Prasad bouncing from the FDA, now weβre never ever EVER gonna see the data.
Prasad on press call:
"I serve at the pleasure of the [FDA] commissioner and the [health] secretary and the president, and as long as weβre all in alignmentβthat me serving is in the best interest of the American peopleβI will continue to serve happily."
1day later, out:
www.wsj.com/health/healt...
In case you were wondering, this is how a normal FDA responds when it feels it needs to clarify a company's public statements about an investigational product.
www.fda.gov/vaccines-blo...
Would the sham procedure Prasad's asking for fool anyone? 10-12 hour surgery + holes in the skull v. 3 scalp nicks in 30 min. If it's not a good sham, it's not ethical to proceed.
Prasad has raised impt concerns about UniQure's data tho. Take it to an adcom.
www.fiercebiotech.com/biotech/seni...
We all knew but here's confirmation the anon official is Prasad:
"You all know that as background, Iβm a professor and Iβm a practicing [hematology-oncology] doctor. I do miss my clinic and I miss teaching, and I miss being able to run my podcast and speak freely."
www.statnews.com/2026/03/06/f...
An Autism Drug Got a White House Boost. Prescriptions Soon Followed.
Researchers say a 2025 press briefing was followed by a sharp rise in prescriptions for leucovorin, an inexpensive drug now being studied for autism.
Read & subscribe (for free!): www.celinegounder.com/p/an-autism-...
I know, I was laughing too. Who does he think he's kidding?
2. I don't know if the design is needed here given the existing data. But I wish we had more than a press release on the 3 year results. (Have I missed a publication?)
3. I am blown away by FDA's public comments on the matter.
4. This needs to get in front of an advisory committee stat.
1. It is not *necessarily* unethical to run a sham surgery trial for a serious disease. It depends on whether it's necessary to answer the relevant scientific questions and if risks can be minimized enough for the benefits of answering those questions to outweigh them.
There are three women I NEVER want to infuriate:
1. Elena Kagan
2. Hillary Clinton
3. Mandy Moore - There's a reason my audio was cut from our duet version of "I Wanna Be With You."
Oh I know - lots of cringey statements in that piece. But gotta latch onto the positive where I can.
It makes me sad how instrumental my own 16 year old is sometimes about his education :( It's in the ether, I guess, because I have tried so hard not to let him fall into that trap.
Yes, ethics!
"The technical skills relevant for today are not going to be relevant even two years from now. It really is more soft skillsβcritical thinking, adaptability. Also ethicsβwhere human judgment comes into play."
Predictable outcome but important nonetheless.
Market access to unproven drugs can make it much harder to figure out if they (and other drugs) work.
Patient desires for access and willingness to tolerate risk and uncertainty are understandable and reasonable. Yet there are critical tradeoffs.
The bill would allow conditional approval based on weak early evidence of effectiveness (distinct from existing accelerated approval). A survey of cancer pts/survivors found they would be significantly less willing to enroll in trials if there was a conditionally approved drug available.
Very interesting survey results re: a bill I've tracked for several years, the Promising Pathway Act.
jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...
@gregggonsalves.bsky.social @reshmagar.bsky.social @alsadvocacy.bsky.social
Very cool: a new six-month fellowship from @theopennotebook.bsky.social and @retractionwatch.com for reporters and editors at local newsrooms to report stories of scientific integrity unfolding at research universities or institutions in their areas. www.theopennotebook.com/2026/02/26/a...
Ole SkΓΈtt, U. of Southern Denmark's health sciences dean, tells @rollingstone.com: βYour enquiry contains new information in relation to the validity of the ethical approval. I have decided this should be investigated. The Hepatitis B project has been put on hold to assess the new information." /6
On Monday, FDA is slated to announce draft guidance on its plausible mechanism pathway for individualized therapeutics. Here's a podcast (w/ me from @weareprimr.bsky.social) to get you up to speed - why the pathway is needed, what's great about it + some concerns.
podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/t...
CNN's Kristen Holmes reports that Trump blew up during a meeting after learning of the SCOTUS ruling on tariffs.
"He started ranting about the decision, not only calling it a disgrace, but started attacking the courts and at one point saying these effing courts, but using the actual language there"
So the Court's decision is not likely to greatly restrict Presidential tariff authority going forward. But the Court's decision is likely to generate other serious practical consequences in the near term. One issue will be refunds. Refunds of billions of dollars would have significant consequences for the U.S. Treasury. The Court says nothing today about whether, and if so how, the Government should go about returning the billions of dollars that it has collected from importers. But that process is likely to be a "mess," as was acknowledged at oral argument. Tr. of Oral Arg. 153-155. A second issue is the decision's effect on the current trade deals. Because IEEPA tariffs have helped facilitate trade deals worth trillions of dollarsβincluding with foreign nations from China to the United Kingdom to Japan, the Court's decision could generate uncertainty regarding various trade agreements. That process, too, could be difficult.
Kavanaugh is attempting to manufacture the legal doctrine of pointus de noreturnis: If the regimeβs unlawful actions are too difficult to unwind, we apparently have no choice but to see them through.
This is so sad. He was only 53. ALS is such a cruel disease.
Eric Dane, McSteamy on βGreyβs Anatomy,β Dies at 53 www.nytimes.com/2026/02/19/a...
Today's the deadline for abstract submission. Come join the health law profs (broadly construed!) at Georgia State June 3-5. See you there!
O'Neill, an investor in anti-aging technology who worked on HHS policy, would be the first non-scientist or engineer to lead NSF. His background will be a 'major concern' to the science and technology community, former NSF director Neal Lane told me.
@maxkozlov.bsky.social and I report: