For those reading along, I predict he'll say "I didn't say Trump was the better option" despite the fact that in any election there is no getting neither candidate, so not voting for one is at least a passive endorsement of the other.
For those reading along, I predict he'll say "I didn't say Trump was the better option" despite the fact that in any election there is no getting neither candidate, so not voting for one is at least a passive endorsement of the other.
You still can't explain how Trump was the better option for Gaza, so I'm guessing I'm not the one doing the glossing here.
Oh dear, did you forget to switch accounts again?
How many of these sock puppets are you running?
So you admitted that Trump didn't stop genocide. Didn't even slow it down.
What you glossed over is that, on his first day in office, Trump removed Israel's restrictions on what ordinance they could use in Gaza, one of the many stipulations Biden put on military aid that Trump removed.
Photographs with deceptive captions are, most definitely, disinformation.
This you?
Yes.
Because if more Dems had voted, we wouldn't be on the brink of nuclear annihilation.
And if more dems don't vote this year, we're going to be even closer.
And no, most Dems aren't supportive of the war with Iran. Nice try though.
Standard Disinformation Tactic: Nothing Really Matters!
Frame your disinformation in terms of hopelessness and powerlessness, making people believe that it doesn't matter what they do, so they should just do nothing.
This is a favored voter suppression technique.
Thanks to you I've got a boot on my neck. So do you.
How does that boot taste when you lick it?
Well, apparently being better in every way on Gaza than Trump wasn't enough for you to actually vote for Harris, so I'm guessing nothing short of perfect would have done the trick.
It's why Dems lose.
I didn't usher in fascism.
I voted against the fascist.
So by your own admission Trump, who is doing EXACTLY what he promised, is at the absolute best equal to Harris on Gaza. In reality we know he's way, way worse, but there is no interpretation where he's better.
Which means if people cared about Gaza they'd have voted for Harris and not sat out.
So in other words, Dems had better be perfect if they want Dem voters to not sit by and allow a fascist into office?
That is REALLY not the dunk you seem to think it is.
I LITERALLY cannot come up with any context that this comment makes sense. I can't substitute anything from that even assuming he misspoke to make it make sense. WTF does anyone's daughter of any age have to do with getting voter ID?
Dems lost the election because of people like you who expect Dems to be perfect but don't hold their opponent to the same standard.
So it's OK if Trump is worse in every way, if the Dem isn't perfect than you just sit it out.
They're not children.
I strongly suspect they're sock puppets. In fact they may even be the same person running both accounts; they started criss-crossing their responses at one point.
I'm not trying to convince them. I'm trying to convince the people who read such threads.
Which was way too many.
And I knew as soon as people started protesting her on Gaza but nobody even asked Trump what he thought on Gaza that it was over. Dems would be applying another unilateral purity test and sitting out or voting 3rd party.
Medi has it wrong.
It's not that he believes.
He thinks we'll believe.
And in way to man instances he's not wrong.
What does it help if we don't go on with our lives?
Our time to do something comes at the voting booth.
Let's try to make sure as many people as possible don't sit it out like they did in 2024.
Says the guy with a cartoon profile picture?
If I fail that means, through inaction, we gave Democracy itself away.
So if that's what you want, then you're exactly who (and what) I presumed you to be.
Sure I did.
I didn't get the coffee cup icon randomly.
Please do.
The more people see you for what you are the better.
It's adorable that you think that somehow screenshots of a conversation, one that can be freely read right there in the conversation itself, is somehow something bad for me.
It's really not.
More like can't respond.
For those reading these replies, this is the point when the sock puppet can't really refute what I'm saying so they just start tossing insults or trying to act too high and mighty to answer the conundrum.
Does anyone know why this tool keeps putting screen captures of our conversation up in the middle of that same conversation?
This is a standard disinformation tactic known as "They Won't Check!"
Make statements that seem to be backed up by a video or article, knowing most won't check to find out it doesn't.
Because Mamdani didn't say anything they're claiming he said.
OK, explain how sitting by and letting MAGA continue to get elected to office by withholding your votes from Dems will accomplish that.
Be specific.
And I said that if you convince enough other idiot Dem voters to not vote, we get another fascist in office.
If we don't vote for Dems in the mid-term, the SAVE act gets passed and then it doesn't matter WHO you vote for.
But that's what you want, if I'm reading you right.
What's even richer?
The fact that when Mamdani was running all you heard was "How did we forget 9/11" even though Mamdani was like 9 years old when it happened.