12.03.2026 14:12
👍 1
🔁 1
💬 0
📌 0
The 1% are a problem the whole world over. That's why they have built bunkers and hire security.
I mean, when we're done with all of this we always have this to look forward to....
www.inkl.com/news/va-anno...
Stick around for the end of the clip where you get to hear a Trump official complain that Iran has “invested all of the wealth of their country … simply to build a war machine.”
I keep seeing people ask about the 25th Amendment.
Guys. His entire Cabinet is walking around in shoes that don’t fit because they’re scared to take them off.
The 25th is never happening.
I'm sure the VA and the DOJ will *totally* allow our Veterans free public independent legal counsel and plenty of time to get their affairs in order before ramming them into custody not of their own choosing. Just like immigrants and even some of our own citizens.
news.va.gov/press-room/v...
".. The lever of closing the Strait of Hormuz must certainly continue to be used,” Khamenei said in a statement aired on state television.
@bloomberg.com
www.bloomberg.com/news/article...
LIVE: United States European Command testifies before the Senate youtube.com/live/EGoVoXU...
Gotta fill the Warehouse Concentration Camps somehow...
www.stripes.com/veterans/202...
Reagan National Terminal D is being evacuated right now. V from Under the Desk News is there reporting live.
Support independent journalists.
I explained this in exhausting detail. It is not debatable. It's a misuse of a source. There is no evidence that Tucker believed, as Wurman claimed, that the children of temporary visitors were excluded from birthright citizenship.
But the testimony is even worse. 5. bsky.app/profile/evan...
I pointed out that Wurman omits entirely to mention that Tucker *is not* discussing the common-law rule here. Tucker is discussing what makes sense to him, as a matter of "natural reason." Then he discusses the common-law rule. He complains about it. 4.
In another antebellum treatise, by Henry St. George Tucker, the son of the more famous Virginian, law professor, and constitutional commentator St. George Tucker, the author discussed the “common law doctrine of allegiance and alienage.” 1 HENRY ST. GEORGE TUCKER, COMMENTARIES ON THE LAWS OF VIRGINIA 57 (1836). He then stated the traditional birthright rule. “But,” he added, though a child be born in the country, yet if both his parents were strangers not designing a permanent change of country, it would be sufficiently obvious, that, as he must follow the condition and succeed to the rights of his parents, he would on the principles of natural rea- son be considered as much a stranger to the country as his father.
Wurman's claim here is *stronger* and more obviously false than a similar claim in the brief that he filed with the Supreme Court, which you can see below. I criticized that claim at the time, and Wurman knows about the criticism. He responded to it. 3.
Professor Bernick shows that Wurman’s testimony was false & that Wurman knew it.
All I’d add is that this is his WRITTEN testimony. This was prepared and edited in advance. So he didn’t misspeak off the cuff.
If someone you respect is sharing this, you should tell them that they are sharing disinformation. How they respond might tell you something about whether you should continue to respect them.
since he and others are now sharing his testimony on social media, I can confirm that his written submission and his oral statements contain the false assertion.
The case of temporary visitors was more complicated at common law. The parents, if lawfully present, were under the temporary protection of the sovereign. That is why one judge in a famous case, Lynch v. Clarke, held in 1844 that a child born of temporary sojourners was a citizen. But the rule was contested because of increasing international travel and the resulting dual allegiances. Joseph Story suggested that an exception for temporary visitors would be a “reasonable qualification” to the rule. Henry St. George Tucker in his treatise stated flatly that temporary visitors fell outside the common-law
I'm afraid I can't just sit here and say nothing when another law professor gives false testimony to Congress about the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Ilan Wurman has given false testimony to Congress, being fully on notice of the falsity. I do not think this is fairly debatable. 1.
"Palantir's the core backbone" = is the center of all the war crimes.
Good to know.
Palantir CEO Alex Karp on his support for Trump's Iran war: "I don't really believe in the wars we've fought in the past, because I don't believe in regime change. And that's one of the reasons I'm supportive of this policy we currently have."
What an embarrassment.
He is far too excited about his ability to kill and the lack of restraint put upon him.
This man is evil and has no limit to his depravity.
De Telegraaf, the Netherlands’ largest newspaper, recently published an interview with a woman promoting €1,600 seats on private evacuation flights from Dubai. Bellingcat found that her image was likely AI-generated, and flight data suggests no such plane took off. www.bellingcat.com/news/2026/03...
Ready, fire, aim!🔥
“US officials called London insurers & brokers, trying to figure out how the market operates, industry insiders said…The conflict has sent rates soaring. It typically now costs 1% to 2% of the ship’s value to insure a vessel in the Gulf…That compares w/around 0.25% in peacetime.”
Exactly this:
I miss those days.
What you let the government do to some of us, you will eventually allow the government to do to all of us.
This is the stuff that gives license to regular folks to let their hate flow freely. The expression of hate, met with a disinterested shrug, sends a strong message.
And that message is sent to our youth as well.
I didn't grow up reciting, "With liberty and justice for all" every morning in school, just to be called WOKE for actually believing in liberty and justice for all.🗽
