We have reached a situation where (1) the time/resources spent by people applying for grant X often outweighs (2) the time/resources awarded.
For these grants, society loses net time/resources.
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
A new take on the limitations of "psychometric networks" now out in Nature Human Behavior. You don't want to put too much confidence in individual edges. Something we cautioned against in 2017.
1/2
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
We’re so proud of the MED Lab team for their excellent posters and presentations at VKC Science Day this week. Congratulations to Yinru @yinrulong.bsky.social , who won best research on underrepresented populations, and Ellie @elliewindham.bsky.social , who won best clinical poster!
We are currently accepting applications for a lab manager position to oversee the administration of multiple grant-funded research projects! More info below: ecsr.fa.us2.oraclecloud.com/hcmUI/Candid...
I can't recommend this opportunity highly enough - the combination of fascinating, impactful work and excellent mentorship make this a top-notch training experience!
So devastating
This looks fantastic, congratulations!
Thank you for sharing these suggestions, we will definitely be incorporating for our next round of data collection!
This is a great point and what we've started digging into now to better understand the effects on power/parameter estimates/etc. Thank you for all your help with this!
Yes, I was thinking baseline/neutral would make sense for those instances!
Thank you for these recommendations! I hadn't considered filler questions to avoid bias towards responding "no" to earlier questions - are there any resources you would point me toward for standard filler questions? Thanks again!
That's a really helpful idea - we were checking to see if these participants might be responding randomly/going quickly through items throughout the survey, we hadn't checked on correlations with momentary affect yet!
That's what we are thinking/why I thought excluding these responses might make sense?
Thank you! Instructions were to rate "How bad did it make you feel" on a 5-point Likert scale. We've looked at responses and many participants respond at floor, suggesting they treated ? as nothing happened so didn't feel bad, other answers are higher, so likely other interpretations present too
ESM Experts, please help! We have EMA surveys asking pts about best/worst event over 2 hrs. Many say no worst event happened, but we allowed them to provide emotion ratings. Should those ratings be excluded from MLM/DSEM models of emotional reactivity? Treated as a neutral condition? Another option?
Wow. I’ve expressed concerns about Frontiers for a long time and won’t submit or review for them, but this suggests things are really bad.
That can’t be right!
I’ve been thinking a lot about how research pace is eclipsed by rate of change in technologies. Many books/articles make claims that aren’t supported by evidence, but research often can’t match need for decision making in the population. How do we adapt to make quality info available sooner?
