taylor venus πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆπŸ‰'s Avatar

taylor venus πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆπŸ‰

@taylorvenus

yea, I’m a butterfly, you just never see my energy ! I’m already high, floatin’ on a breeze πŸ¦‹ (she/they. 30. lesbian)

93
Followers
87
Following
152
Posts
13.11.2024
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by taylor venus πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆπŸ‰ @taylorvenus

If she does she’s not doing a very good job at getting her point across

24.05.2025 13:42 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

her hypocrisy astounds me

19.05.2025 13:00 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

her hypocrisy knows no bounds

19.05.2025 13:00 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

makes whatever point she is trying to make (to who idk) fall apart in the eyes of his far right audience. this woman’s logic is deeply flawed and her hypocrisy is glaring

19.05.2025 10:31 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

look I’m no fan of Albo but I understood the politically uneducated audience the interview with him was for. one of the critiques of abbie’s interview was that she didn’t challenge albo enough but clem on piers cannot even get a word in edgeways and it just-

19.05.2025 10:30 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

hey quick question why would clementine ford sit on a leftist high horse dragging abbie chatfield for interviewing the PM but then go on PIERS FUCKING MORGAN’S SHOW πŸ’€

19.05.2025 10:30 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Isn’t Everest tourism killing the environment and also putting the local sherpas at risk all the time? Wow some environmental ally Clem is πŸ€ͺ everything I find out about her gets worse

13.05.2025 12:29 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

she gatekeeps politics and feminism and pits herself as the authority because she’s university educated etc. she’s just kind of a mean girl

12.05.2025 03:45 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

finally there is discourse about clementine ford having turned into a bully toward people on the same side as her. been biting my tongue on it since she snapped on me in her comments section for simply questioning her methods. she is projecting her (rightful) anger at the world onto the wrong people

12.05.2025 03:44 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

I am sure there’s more but the only thing coming to mind now is the witch twins from a later season of The Vampire Diaries but they very much sidelined over the guy over the girl one (he was gay too but from memory his bf was only ever mentioned off screen which sucked 😭)

11.05.2025 00:40 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

the fact we have to number all of them is terrifying me. obviously I’ll number greens 1 then Labor second but which order do I put the rest since all 4 of the rest are shithouse

21.04.2025 06:38 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

the candidates I have to choose from for house of reps for this election is fuckin bleak. there’s 6 and it’s greens (which I’ll number 1), labor, then liberal, libertarian, one nation and an independent who has a bunch of coked out rants on his website including one about how palestine β€œisn’t real”

21.04.2025 06:37 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

*comedy festival

18.04.2025 00:50 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

anyone wanna see sez and nazeem hussain at the comedy show tonight? My friend with the tickets woke up sick and something came up for me so she’s looking to sell. 2 tickets for each show, nazeem’s at 4, sez is at 6

18.04.2025 00:49 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

thank you!

17.04.2025 02:44 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

how it feels to be an optimist living in late stage capitalism

17.04.2025 02:44 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

But could you number like 1-16 say below the line and stop if none of the parties after that aligned with you?

16.04.2025 11:50 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Ooh thank you! I was wondering this too, like if I went over 12 if I then had to keep going all the way or could stop at a random number after

16.04.2025 11:21 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

I hope so! I was just looking at all the senators running though and wanted to preference a few more than others and wondered what would happen if I preferenced a greener (pun intended) senator over a seasoned one and didn’t number the seasoned one. Would that waste my vote if I want greens in?

16.04.2025 10:57 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

I guess my fear is what happens if none of my preferences get up enough

16.04.2025 10:53 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

so might be worth numbering all the senators in the party I prefer anyway, even if I don’t order them consecutively? I guess I just fear it being wasted if I only vote for, say, 2 greens senators and then ignore the other ones for other progressive parties/ind cause what if none of them get up

16.04.2025 10:49 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

No that’s House of Reps. Senate you can choose 6 or 12 and they don’t have to be either major

16.04.2025 10:41 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Yeah I know that I guess I’m more wondering if it’s wasted if none of your 12 have a chance of getting in (say I wanted to nominate 2 newer Greens candidates over the seasoned one who is #1 on the list) How do preferences flow then?

16.04.2025 10:41 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0

Oh I was sussing out the senate ballot. Isn’t that one by state? And the House of Reps is your electorate? Cause for Victoria there’s 6 Greens

16.04.2025 10:39 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

I know it’s 1-12 instead of 1-6 like above the line but I guess I’m wondering what happens if I preference say, two greens senators and then give my other preferences to other progressive party senators/ind and then none of those greens senators are popular enough? Not sure if that makes sense

16.04.2025 10:37 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

I guess I like the concept of voting below because it means I don’t have to go with whoever that party has nominated as #1 but then does that matter if the senator I #1 doesn’t get enough? Does this make sense?

16.04.2025 10:34 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

I know greens will be alright but what if I want one greens senator over the other. If I preference only, say, 2-3 greens senators and don’t number the others and give my other preferences to other parties what happens then?

16.04.2025 10:32 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0

I guess my confusion comes in with wondering if it’s a waste if not enough people vote below the line? like if I number, say, all the greens senators and progressive parties/ind from 1-12 what happens if not enough ppl preference those senators or at least not in the order I did

16.04.2025 10:30 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

gonna be vulnerable with an auspol question here and admit I don’t really know how voting below the line works but I want to do it this year because it means I don’t have to number either of the major parties on the senate ballot if I don’t want to (?) and-

16.04.2025 10:29 πŸ‘ 5 πŸ” 4 πŸ’¬ 6 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

extremely unsurprising vote compass result for me

01.04.2025 08:10 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0