Matthew Stiegler's Avatar

Matthew Stiegler

@matthewstiegler

Appellate lawyer, president of Third Circuit Bar Association, former prosecutor, fellow of American Academy of Appellate Lawyers. Boring until fascism. Views here: just mine.

8,085
Followers
1,112
Following
5,856
Posts
10.07.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Matthew Stiegler @matthewstiegler

Preview
The war makes it more urgent for journalists to call out Trump’s derangement | Press Watch The commander-in-chief is unfit for duty.

I've been struggling with how to express my dismay at the war coverage by our top newsrooms, and how it dances around the central fact that Trump is deranged and unfit to command. I finally wrote something. Please read it. presswatchers.org/2026/03/the-...

10.03.2026 20:01 πŸ‘ 1062 πŸ” 421 πŸ’¬ 32 πŸ“Œ 39

Wow-ee

10.03.2026 18:03 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
The DC Disciplinary Counsel has filed ethics charges against DOJ pardon attorney Ed Martin over the letter he sent Georgetown on its DEI policies, court filings show

The charges, filed Friday but made public Tuesday, allege he violated the 1st & 5th amendments of the constitution by using his position to threaten not to hire Georgetown students unless the school ceased teaching DEI

The DC Disciplinary Counsel has filed ethics charges against DOJ pardon attorney Ed Martin over the letter he sent Georgetown on its DEI policies, court filings show The charges, filed Friday but made public Tuesday, allege he violated the 1st & 5th amendments of the constitution by using his position to threaten not to hire Georgetown students unless the school ceased teaching DEI

Another reason why Bondi is trying to block state bars from investigating DOJ attorneys accused of ethics violations (which is itself illegal): slate.com/news-and-pol...

10.03.2026 14:57 πŸ‘ 321 πŸ” 108 πŸ’¬ 5 πŸ“Œ 5
Preview
Ed Martin, outspoken Justice Department lawyer, is formally accused of ethical violations | CNN Politics Ed Martin, an outspoken Trump administration official, is facing attorney discipline proceedings in Washington, DC, for a letter he sent to Georgetown Law about its diversity programs, the district’s...

Eagle Ed soars again www.cnn.com/2026/03/10/p...

10.03.2026 14:51 πŸ‘ 263 πŸ” 61 πŸ’¬ 3 πŸ“Œ 10
Preview
In Scathing Ruling, Judge Says 3 Trump Prosecutors Are in Unlawful Roles

An absurd situation. Gift link.

FYI, Chief Judge Brann is a conservative Republican. Don’t be confused by his being nominated by Obama, that’s a Pa. quirk, he was picked by Toomey.

www.nytimes.com/2026/03/09/n...

09.03.2026 23:34 πŸ‘ 130 πŸ” 58 πŸ’¬ 7 πŸ“Œ 1

Nunziata: β€œThe rule of law is not self-sustaining; it does not defend itself; it does not replenish itself automatically. It must be stewarded. And stewardship is not just a technical obligation; it is a moral one.”

09.03.2026 13:30 πŸ‘ 5 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Stewardship in the Storm: Our Duty to the Rule of Law The law cannot be seen as a loaded gun on the table.

@greggnunziata.bsky.social of @chkbal.bsky.social: β€œAll of usβ€”but especially lawyersβ€”have a duty not merely to use this system, but to proclaim its worth and to defend it from corrosion, exploitation, and abuse.”

chkbal.substack.com/p/stewardshi...

09.03.2026 13:29 πŸ‘ 5 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Look, I know I’ve been wrong before, but: there ain’t no way they’re topping this.

06.03.2026 19:17 πŸ‘ 20 πŸ” 3 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0

I’ll pass along your complaint, I know one of the founders there.

06.03.2026 15:43 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Sure. As Jon Adler responded to me, he’s not exactly the best messenger for this. And the message itself is somewhat tepid, too.

06.03.2026 15:32 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Unsuccessfully, different story.

06.03.2026 14:57 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

You don’t get to successfully oppose an autocrat with only the people you mostly agree with.

06.03.2026 14:57 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

The fact that he’s messaging counts for something, I’d say

06.03.2026 14:50 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
The Cathedral of Justice is Crumbling A former attorney general’s call to action.

The Cathedral of Justice is Crumbling, by Alberto Gonzales (AG under GWB)

chkbal.substack.com/p/the-cathed...

06.03.2026 14:44 πŸ‘ 4 πŸ” 2 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 2

This is not getting picked up in western media but it's an insane story. Oschadbank is a Ukrainian state bank, and Hungary has detained it's employees and millions of dollars in cash and gold on the way from Austria to Ukraine.

Like what the fuck?!

06.03.2026 00:13 πŸ‘ 66 πŸ” 25 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 2
Post image

Of course.

05.03.2026 23:32 πŸ‘ 1558 πŸ” 269 πŸ’¬ 506 πŸ“Œ 89
Preview
Lindsey Halligan Is Under Investigation by the Florida Bar

BREAKING NYT:

Lindsey Halligan, the ex-U.S. attorney in the Eastern District of Virginia who brought criminal cases against Trump's enemies over the objections of career prosecutors, is under investigation by Florida's bar association, according to a letter the organization sent last month.

05.03.2026 20:30 πŸ‘ 4127 πŸ” 1057 πŸ’¬ 177 πŸ“Œ 153

Tohickon Creek, in Bucks County.

05.03.2026 14:40 πŸ‘ 4 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Okay, that's what I had to say. Now I'm off to kayak.

05.03.2026 14:39 πŸ‘ 8 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 1

Those two Scotus actions aren't the ones that have drawn the most outrage, but in my view they were the critical moments that increased this danger exponentially, that made DOJ's win-by-losing strategy viable.

05.03.2026 14:37 πŸ‘ 8 πŸ” 4 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

The second was Scotus nuking nationwide injunctions last July. Stealing from lower courts the power to efficiently apply the law to nationwide lawbreaking. And at the most cynical, two-middle-fingers-to-the-world time, after 4 years of Kacsmaryk obstruction, as the MAGA tsunami was crashing ashore.

05.03.2026 14:34 πŸ‘ 15 πŸ” 4 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

The first was the Supreme Court kneecapping Judge Boasberg a year ago. I, a ranting cynic, was blindsided by that. I believe it sent a loud message the entire federal judiciary heard:

If those Scotus asshats don't have *Boasberg's* back, you best believe they will not have yours. A huge moment.

05.03.2026 14:28 πŸ‘ 15 πŸ” 3 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Viewed through this lens, where Trump's DOJ can be extraordinarily potent even though it's getting its ass kicked in ruling after ruling, I submit that there were 2 really crucial moments that amplified the danger.

05.03.2026 14:23 πŸ‘ 7 πŸ” 2 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Whether by design or just by lucky sociopathy, the Trump DOJ has landed on a legal strategy as bold, unorthodox, and effective as the Nazi blitzkrieg invasion of France through Belgium.

05.03.2026 14:20 πŸ‘ 7 πŸ” 3 πŸ’¬ 3 πŸ“Œ 0

We all have great fun ridiculing Trump's DOJ for the shameless incompetence of its EXECUTION of its strategy. And rightly so.

But that profound incompetence obscures something we, the believers in democracy and the rule of law, need to grapple with: the creative brilliance of the STRATEGY.

05.03.2026 14:15 πŸ‘ 12 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 1

The gist of that article is this: DOJ keeps losing again and again and again in court, but they're winning anyway.

I think it's impossible to understand where we're at right now without understanding that.

05.03.2026 14:11 πŸ‘ 17 πŸ” 6 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 1

The key to unlocking THE big deal, in my view, is this found in this recent New York Times story. If you haven't read it yet, ignore my ramblings and go read it instead, for both our sake.

bsky.app/profile/emmb...

05.03.2026 14:05 πŸ‘ 19 πŸ” 11 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

I think DOJ's new effort to insulate itself from state disciplinary investigation is A big deal, but not THE big deal.

bsky.app/profile/matt...

05.03.2026 14:03 πŸ‘ 21 πŸ” 9 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 1

Today, friends, I am going kayaking. This morning, I have a few thoughts that may be worthwhile, and that maybe could be caressed into a semblance of persuasive coherence. But no time for that, I don't even know where my sprayskirt is yet. So, sans coherence, here's what's on my mind.

05.03.2026 14:00 πŸ‘ 28 πŸ” 3 πŸ’¬ 4 πŸ“Œ 1
If she cared about keeping her staff out of trouble, she could just quit asking them to do wildly unethical stuff. It would be a twofer, saving them from contempt sanctions as well as possible disbarment. Plus it would probably help a lot with retention and morale!

I’m kidding β€” we all know she’s not going to do that.

If she cared about keeping her staff out of trouble, she could just quit asking them to do wildly unethical stuff. It would be a twofer, saving them from contempt sanctions as well as possible disbarment. Plus it would probably help a lot with retention and morale! I’m kidding β€” we all know she’s not going to do that.

Liz Dye doesn’t play.

05.03.2026 12:52 πŸ‘ 88 πŸ” 27 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 1