Einstein's teleparallelism is basically 4D liquid crystal: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telepar...
Einstein's teleparallelism is basically 4D liquid crystal: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telepar...
What is space, really? Thatβs one of the biggest questions in science. According to a pair of researchers from the Perimeter Institute, the answer to that is: a quasicrystal. What is a quasicrystal, and how is space a quasicrystal? Letβs take a look.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=0azO...
Maybe liquid crystals? Lot's happening in this direction, e.g.:
- quark strings nonperturbatively modeled as topological vortices e.g. www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
- point-like elementary charges, also obtained as topological, e.g. www.nature.com/articles/s41... , arxiv.org/pdf/2108.07896
In 1977 Rosen questioned existence of GW because of unavoidable by symmetry advanced waves travelling toward our past-was this issue finally resolved?
link.springer.com/article/10.1...
If not, maybe it should finally tested experimentally, e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692
#GravitationalWave @ligo.org
While quantum shamans claim there is magic, consciousness etc. needed to understand QM ... Feynman ensembles show we just need to accept math: Lagrangian formalism - everything is already there
www.youtube.com/watch?v=8hdl...
ps. I see you work with BH information paradox - worth to start asking this question for white hole - which continuously emit interacting with environment, heating matter around.
Applying T/CPT symmetry, black hole should also interact - by negative radiation pressure, cooling matter around.
This graphic seems clear - what exactly you dont get?
www.youtube.com/watch?v=NsI5...
One of my examples: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asymmet... - that piercing the mainstream wall is really tough.
First ~decade ignored, then aversion by experts as it obsoletes many their articles ... and currently the basic language of our electronics - e.g. in Linux kernel, JPEG XL.
Cover of I Told You So!
"In his new book, I Told You So!, Matt Kaplanβa longtime science correspondent for The Economistβtraces a lineage of internal resistance to paradigm-changing scientific ideas from the Victorian era to today."
Read the #ScienceBooks Review: https://scim.ag/4c70qjX
Already Maxwell equations have solutions traveling in both time directions ... and e.g. LIGO seems to see both: arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692
Physics is CPT symmetric - applying it and evolving backward to Big Bang and further, it should be quite symmetric before - nearly requiring Big Bounce.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CPT_sym...
on overworked single developer working for free
Since 2017 Linux kernel uses Zstd (LZ+tANS) - developed by corporation so should be safer
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zstd#Us...
The problem is that current photonic have only one-way control, while standard electronics has two-way: push&pull electrons through chip.
To reach their full potential e.g. www.qaif.org/2wqc we need to also get two-way photonic computers.
While standard one-way quantum computers (1WQC) are unlikely to break current cryptography/currency, 2WQC ( qaif.org/2wqc ) seem quit close like classical electronics pushing&pulling electrons through chip, and in theory might break nearly all-solve NP, also having better error correction.
Behavior of real neurons - very different from e.g. MLP/KAN ... but maybe we can/should get closer with ANNs, e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2405.05097 ?
www.youtube.com/watch?v=lldJ...
AI exceeded capabilities of human mathematicians
As today is Polish Science Day, here is a good summary of its achievements:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timelin...
They found galaxy looking older then the Universe - with 4.7 sigma for JADES-1050323.
So could galaxy survive Big Bounce?
phys.org/news/2026-02...
physics.stackexchange.com/questions/85...
#astronomy
www.phoronix.com/news/Chrome-...
Chrome 145 (current) has started support of JPEG XL long-term JPEG successor, which should soon replace JPG, PNG, GIF - greatly reducing size and improving quality of our images and photos. Firefox and PDF are next.
While for classical computers we can push&pull electrons through a chip: have two-way control(2W), for quantum there is only focus on 1WQC.
Reaching 2WQC ( www.qaif.org/2wqc ), in theory they could solve NP problems, have better error correction...requiring PQC resistant to NP-solvers.
#Quantum #PQC
And what would be the color of white hole?
As it didn't have retarded EM counterpart, can we be really certain it was retarded event (not advanced)?
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various observational suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making it even more interesting.
Congratulations!
As it didn't have retarded EM counterpart, can we be really certain it was retarded event (not advanced)?
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making LISA even more interesting.
Congratulations!
As it didn't have retarded EM counterpart, can we be really certain it was retarded event (not advanced)?
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making it even more interesting.
LIGO might soon turn out even more interesting - as there was observed only 1 (retarded) EM counterpart per ~400 events, and mathematically also advanced solutions are allowed.
More arguments e.g. "too early events", missing SMBHs for PTA (if only retarded): arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692
#GW10Years
arxiv.org/pdf/2601.03326
Detailed description of shape modulo rotation - extending PCA to higher order tensor/polynomial - e.g. for chemoinformatics, evaluating shape similarity, 2D image/3D object search
As it didn't have retarded EM counterpart, can we be certain it was retarded event (not advanced)?
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making it even more interesting.
As it didn't have retarded EM counterpart, can we be certain it was retarded event (not advanced)?
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making it even more interesting.
As it didn't have retarded EM counterpart, can we be certain it was retarded event (not advanced)?
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making it even more interesting.