Thanks, Kat!
Thanks, Kat!
(4) how the requirements imposed by Rule 18.3 violate attorney-client confidentiality requirements and work product protections.
Comments & suggestions highly welcome.
It focuses upon: (1) errors within Rule 18.3 itself, (2) the unreasonable burden Rule 18.3 imposes; (3) Rule 18.3βs incompatibility with how generative AI technology is used; and
screen shot of first page of article
I just submitted my latest: Yikes! The Bluebookβs Generative AI Rule is Flawed on Scholastica. It is available on SSRN here:
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
This book review considers the Bluebookβs new generative AI rule, concluding that the Bluebookβs requirements are inappropriate.
Grateful to Professor Elvy and Jotwell for this review of my latest article --
cyber.jotwell.com/federal-civi...
This is terribly stressful and frustrating for those hires (who are smart and talented and will undoubtedly find employment somewhere else), but the Department will be the biggest loser here: this decision will deter future applicants for years.
Heartbreaking news. I was so fortunate to get my start at DOJ through the Honors Program, and this is a huge loss. www.washingtonpost.com/national-sec...
Thank you, Joe!
Maybe these? I love everything I've ever made from this site! smittenkitchen.com/2017/04/almo...
Announcement of a call for submissions for a student prize in California legal history.
Student writing competition in California Legal History. $$$ prizes. From the California Supreme Court Historical Society.
Please share widely.